lad @ sukhmel @programming.dev

Rust dev, I enjoy reading and playing games, I also usually like to spend t

---

Read more

Posts

7

Comments

2,243

Joined

3 yr. ago

'Tis a very good rope

I'm not entirely sold on the idea, because the article shows no example of defining and using special error codes. It leaves an impression that if anything you want to recover from is IO and HTTP (no HTTP/2, too) then it's all good.

Still it looks interesting and I will take a deeper look into it later

Most likely, they pay something like $5/lb of lost luggage, which is not nearly enough

I was lucky to eventually get the lost bags instead of a useless payment when my bags were lost

Food assholes is a very peculiar dish, must be something like doughnuts

Basically, this. One more reason to hide away from anyone watching you input the code

They saw him, but arguing that otherwise they would have gotten a warrant to compel him, so it's legit

Oh, it's this ‘let's call absolutely different things or even polar opposites the same name’ trope again, I hate it. Thanks for digging it up and informing us

But that's so much less fun as a headline!

I think, it's based on an old flake-compat package or something. It's not inherently bad, but it displays what I dislike the most about Nix design, it's very opaque and magical until you go out of your way to understand it.

The globals are another example of this, I know I can do with something; [ other ] but I am never sure if other comes from something or not. And if it's a package parameter, the values also come seemingly out of nowhere.

Sometimes it's also the updates, rolling back a failed update is much simpler with Nix even if it took some elaborate set-up. This might be not wildly useful but it happens more often than spinning up a new machine entirely

Personally I use flakes.

On the work we use an abomination that creates flake.lock but then parses it and uses to pin versions, it took me a while to realise this is why setting a flake input to something local never seemed to have any effect, for instance

You look fab, and I hope you will go on wearing what you like.

Regarding the effect camo has, I'm not 100% convinced. If it were pink or acid coloured ‘camo’ that's one thing, but just a regular one I can't disconnect from military in my mind. That of course will vary widely from person to person

As they say, office is the pinnacle of productivity

Community publishing the configs sometimes confuses even more, because everyone does the same things differently, and some are deprecated, and some are experimental, and I was lost way more times than once while trying to make sense of it.

I like Nix, and I use it on my Mac and in our production for cross-compiling a service, but man is it a pain to fix issues. That is beside the point that for some reason Nix behaves a bit different on my machine and on co-workers', and the only thing I wanted from it is to be absolutely reproducible

All of the defendants were acquitted by an all-white jury. In 1984, nine Klansmen and Nazis were acquitted in a federal civil trial, again by an all-white jury, although during the grand jury proceedings that led to the second trial, one Klansmen had pleaded guilty to firing the first shot.[4] The second trial jury accepted the defense argument that the assaults by the defendants were not based on racial animus, but on hatred of communism

In 2009, the Greensboro City Council passed a resolution expressing regret for the deaths in the march. In 2015, the city unveiled a marker to memorialize the Greensboro Massacre. On August 15, 2017 and again on October 6, 2020, the Greensboro City Council formally apologized to the victims for the massacre.

I guess, it is okay then

All right, that sounds like a good set-up. But you say almost nothing an anticheat could do against it, this again makes me wonder what horrific ways can be devised to detect this. Other than maybe keeping memory and traffic encrypted

Probably, because camo is usually a sign of a military wannabe, and saying you like it is like admitting to being one.

You may as well not be a military wannabe, but may make that impression nevertheless

78%, but yes

This is going to be way harder, most likely even than to remove anti heat. And hardware detecting targets is not even viable yet, imo

I also wonder why it would even be necessary for the cheats to run on the system the person is cheating on.

How else should it run? I can't imagine a scenario other than some hardware cheats like a scope overlay for an unscoped weapon or macro keyboard/mouse, but maybe there's something I'm missing?