But could the Pax Americana frame success by people of color as a problem that incurs unsustainable huge sacrifices or a problem that increase complecency just like the success by free riding Western European diaspora who lived on the innovation and skilled labor of other people? They did claim that success by Russia, China, Iran, and Iraq will make the people of color into the most evil countries and that the Liberals and Bretton Wood institutions need to establish an international command economy that overrides the authority of the invisible hand of the market to compensate for the laziness of the Liberals.

There are the Indian Residential fake school genocide that continued after the Cold War, the subjugation of communities of freed slaves, the Black Wall Street massacre, the Cold War massacre against a mass of peaceful workers who demand meritocracy on the excuse that human rights advocate are evil Soviet agents, and the current planned illegal dumping of hazardous landfills and industrial chemical waste (which contains components of the chemical weapons by British in WW1) onto to the lands of First Nations and African American communities to poison the water and food sources.

It is ironic how the US is causing all the protectionism and sanctions against their Liberal principle of free trade when the US had been criticizing anti-imperialists for the obstruction of free trade. It is as if the Pax Americana advocates were projecting their anti-Liberal actions on people of colors who demand democracy, meritocracy, and rule of law. Is the Western European liberals also the ones who provide the most support for command economy with the Bretton Woods Institutions that became the de facto government on the global economy even when they tried to deny this hypocrisy with their redefinition of Capitalism (government by for-profit firm owner), Socialism (government by working class), and dictatorship of the Proletariat (government by workers in modern American redefinition)?

The electoral system in USSR and China worked differently to suit their circumstances and culture. The US depends solely on rigged electoralism where they have two political parties that differs little other than their slogan and branding. USSR allow people to elect members of a political party instead of the election of a political party and they use a high indirect electoral system where people elect leader in the next hierarchy which works at that time due to the mass illiteracy, lack of experience of prior electoral system, political instability, and lack of resource for Western European diapora-styled electoralism. The USSR also use the rule of law and check of power by independent government departments to prevent mass corruption although the Western European diaspora say that any mass protest against Western European authoritarianism must be from one evil authoritarian mastermind that can overcome the fantasy logic of Liberalism to make a fully functioning prosperitive democratic system without the need for free riding unlike Western European diaspora countries.

The Liberals interestingly label the four most successful countries from the non-Western European diaspora as the four enemies. Is it a coincidence that countries that become superpower without Western European diaspora are somehow the most evil countries in the world? Or is it Western European jeolousy to destroy any success by the people of color like the historic destruction of the Black Wall Street and conquest of free slaves in the USA?

The Liberals with their Bretton Wood Institutions have absolute authority to dictate what words mean. They could say that dictatorship means absolutism.

Putin only intervene to stop genocide from Euromaiden NATO puppet and even the NATO admit that Putin achieve protection of ethnic minority and not the Ukraine takeover that only existed in the imagination of Pax Americana fanatics. Your belief that humanitarian intervention will lead to evil outcome is disproven.

Liberal: "But the rich who willingly endangered themselves deserves way more better treatment than the many refugees who were forced into homelessness by wars and oppressive regimes that we absolutely did not cause [contrary to the evidence]!"

So does this mean that the Liberals confess to market failure to produce accountable media companies. Liberalism with the free market and democracy (not that they support them outside of lipservice and aesthetics especially in non-European diaspora countries) depends on the perfect information of the people and the ability to use the media to deceive the people will cause failure of the Liberal system. The Liberals also have no excuse to blame the people in Western European diaspora countries for their ignorance since they always blame people in the developing countries for their vulnerability to 'deception' (read willingly follow Communism if fully informed) by Communists.

Women Across Culture: A Global Perspective by Shawn Meghan Burn did discuss about the appropriation of feminist label to mean white feminism and that the white female colonizers claimed to oppose imperialism and women's domination by men of color in the European Age of Conquest when the white women hypocritically support the white patriachal oppression of women of color to gain support from racist sexist white men for white feminism. Although white feminist in Western European diaspora did take some action against men of color, they will disregard the perspective of women of color who face the actual oppression and demand the women of color to submit to sexist white men for salvation.

Western European diaspora media entertainment communities did complained that Chinese censored pornography in games and anime (like r/gachegaming in Reddit) or that they still expect non-traditional women to wear skirt.

The Western Christian will even claim that Karl Marx is a self-hating Jew because Marx deny the existance of god.

The Liberals need advertisements, especially on teh vulnerable children, to indoctrinate the consumerism mentality on the people because the Liberals think that the people cannot make their own financial decision contrary to their democratic slogan. The Liberals also think that wasteful spending will magically boost the economy, but they hide that the economic boost is from increased investment on con-artists to bankrupt countries into huge debt from 'foreign aids' and on military coercion to establish genocidal governments in former European colonies so they can violate property rights, loot from Indigenous groups, enslave the local people, and dump all their toxic waste into third world countries to create all the third world problems. They already use the Indian Residential fake Schools to enslave Indigenous children in North America and Australia and stop the abducted Indigenous children from invalidating the fake documents that will transfer all the inheritance of the abducted children to the European immigrants to sustain their wasteful spending although the residential fake schools become less productive beginning in 1980s.

A big indicator that the 'Ukrainian' supporter is actually a Fascist who support the ethnic genocide by the current puppet Kyiv government is that they antagonize all Ukrainians who are ethnically and linguistically Russians even when they claimed to sympathize with the Russian Ukrainians who were murdered from the false flag terrorism by Azov thugs.

I do not know much about current anarchism, only that there are historical anarchists that oppose Western European states and that ally with USSR.

The Liberals, their white supremacist allies, and their tankiejerker alias always reappropriate any ideologies and slogans for their parasitic agenda and I am sure that actual anarchists are not people who mindlessly tank anyone who oppose Western European diaspora imperialism unlike the internet anarchists.

My mistake. The description is just like the tankiejerkers so I assumed that they pretend to be communists. Anyway, why are they bringing politics into non political communities and why are they so confident that Communists will follow the modern American redefinition of dictatorship? Did some crazy abnormal political maniac infiltrated the communities? Or were the communities a political group in disguise from the beginning?

I do not know about the elevator communities, but this is likely part of the false flag groups that pretend to be Communists to give false credibility to the blatant lies of the Liberals. The impersonation could also disguise the infighting among the Liberals as fighting against external political groups, create illusion of Communist infighting, or frame the Communists for the misdeed of the Liberals especially when the Liberals have no moral standing with their hypocrisy and self contradiction.

My interpretation of the quote: "It is only hateful when it is the truth that the spoiled childish free riders with very fragile ego in the Pax Americana order do not like it"