Not all morals or beliefs have to be unshakable or viewed as morally reprehensible for disagreement.
The tweet suggests the sample group disagrees with this statement.
I think you're expressing the general consensus: people get a lot of their morals from their environment, but there's some stuff that's universal/non-negotiable; and we should be able to find common ground with that.
At least, I think that's the general consensus. I've gotten into trouble with that assumption though.
That's what I really want to see/hear in interviews. I find it's rare, however. The journalist needs to be fairly knowledgeable on the topic at hand, and have the gumption to challenge a guest.
Yeah. Carney needs to define himself in the public's mind before the Conservatives do. So far he's benefited from being an unknown, since we can project positives onto him, but that period is ending.
The stuff you'd include in a movie (fascism, capes, managed democracy, friendly fire, dropships, weird aliens) are the same between the two installments.
They can still differentiate with software features, storage, memory, and other hardware features (UWB and uh, I dunno? the temperature sensor? lolololol).
Really.