Skip Navigation
YouTube creator sues Nvidia and OpenAI for ‘unjust enrichment’ for using their videos for AI training
  • Just as an interesting "what if" scenario - a human making the effort to stylize Van Gogh is okay, and the problem with the AI model is that it can spit out endless results from endless sources.

    What if I made a robot and put the Van Gogh painting AI in it, never releasing in elsewhere. The robot can visualize countless iterations of the piece it wants to make but its only way share it is to actually paint it - much in the same way a human must do the same process.

    Does this scenario devalue human effort? Is it an acceptable use of AI? If so does that mean that the underlying issue with AI isn't that it exists in the first place but that its distribution is what makes it devalue humanity?

    *This isn't a "gotcha", I just want a little discussion!

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SA
    saplyng @lemmy.world
    Posts 0
    Comments 8