That may be true but the license thing was dishonest because no one was really unlicensed in any way. That is like saying I could rake in a lot more money committing fraud than conducting legitimate business.
In theory could you not use a prepay card unless it reserves a charge for the theoretical full amount up front?
So close, but it was supposed to be a bipedal robot.
That won't cause bad sectors though, that just means the data you were writing was bad.
Only not normal behaviour for a pre installed system. Windows out of the box install often requires chipset drivers installing for all but usb1.1 speeds as well as drivers for many 3rd party peripherals.
Don't let pesky things like facts ruin a perfectly fine feel good piece to make gammon feel a bit chuffed with themselves.
I'm in the UK and no one I know considers the 360 to have won, regional preferences for one over the other perhaps?
My experience is that seems to be a US centric view that the 360 "won" it's generation, I've never encountered that view locally and it's ultimately not born out by statistics although it was the closest Microsoft ever came.
Turns out you can make more money by reducing usability and user choice in an entrenched product because hardly anyone will baulk and jump ship to a different product.
We are walking talking general intelligence so we know it's possible for them to exist, the question is more if we can implement one using existing computational technology.
They want to be the Gillette of gaming it seems.
I think the point is that "not having ads" shouldn't be allowed to become the premium experience when it used to be the standard experience.
It's exactly a monopoly for the chosen ones, gate keeping at its worst. Anything that isn't blessed is going to be a bit more effort to get working, but I wouldn't say Kodi is unsuitable for the average user on the grounds of the widevine module though, the DRM module extraction is automated when installing a plugin that requires it.
Except spirits doesn't mean tiny physical things, it refers to things outside of the physical that cannot be measured or quantified by definition. If spirit was just their word for biodiversity that would be fine but then we'd be talking about sites being biodiverse and not sacred because we'd have established that sacred isn't the correct translation. You keep repeating the same baseless justifications for spiritualistic and religious practices to be treated like some kind of science but they aren't and never will be. They are ritualised behaviours that are successful only because the competing alternatives lead to the collapse of the populations practicing them and would fare less well in alternative environments. We are done here, there is nothing more productive to be gained from you repeating the same misunderstanding of science.
Why should I be concerned if a leap of intuition led to the conclusion things falling and movement of the planets were caused by the same thing? Doesn't matter how a hypothesis was postulated, what matters is that it can be tested and falsified. That is the important thing, not who cane up with it and why. This is what you are utterly failing to grasp, it doesn't really matter what axioms are assumed or what leap of logic or faith or whatever leads to the hypothesis. Spirits aren't testable of falsifiable. Same issue with boltzmann brains which is why they aren't taken seriously apart from as a foil to show how incomplete our understanding still is.
This is a bit more than just a language difference and shows just how little you really know or understand the differences between supernatural belief and scientific method.
Let's take your example of the observation (not conclusion) that things fall down. Let's say you have your conclusion that the spirits of the earth always pull things down for reasons. I have the conclusion that it's because mass attracts mass due to gravity. Based on the one observation we have the same evidence supporting our theory's so how do we tell them apart? Well if gravity is true we have all kinds of predicted phenomena that should also happen, it also explains why the sun and moon behave as they do. What does the spirits of the earth theory predict... nothing other than things fall down. It's useless for being able to predict other phenomena, it wouldn't even predict things would fall down on other planets as they might not have pull things down spirits and we might not even have asked why the spirits pull things down.
Also, it isn't "western science" which again betrays some kind of nationalistic agenda on your part. It's just science and anyone can do it, it doesnt belong to "western" countries.
As for "supernatural" explaination in western science, you act like every random hypothesis is taken seriously... They aren't, they are picked apart for lack of predictive power, unless a hypothesis makes hard predictions of how the world would work if it were and weren't true it's pointless as it can't be tested or used in any meaningful way. The "boltzman brain" you mention is just a thought experiment and isn't even a serious scientific hypothesis. Scientists as a whole know and accept they don't know everything, otherwise they wouldn't be wasting time doing science would they?
You insisting they are the same doesn't make it so, an ecologist studying the effects of leaving an area fallow or untouched leads to greater understanding and allows optimisation and application to other areas. Believing the spirits reside in a particular grove does not allow the same and confers no greater understanding because the basis for the practice is incorrect even if the practice itself is sound. But sure, you tell yourself that they do to justify holding onto supernatural explaination despite the fact they have little corelation to reality.
Except you have a false equivalence, we don't have sacred sites that are left undisturbed so as to keep the forest spirits happy and the scientists who go there are not communing with anything. Your parable of the sacred site functioning as an ecological reservoir doesn't change the fact that the local people's reason for leaving the area alone was wrong unless it was specifically understood that it was a reservoir for biodiversity and not some supernatural explaination involving spirits.