redrum @ redrumBot @lemmy.ml

---

Read more

Posts

21

Comments

179

Joined

3 yr. ago

Moderating

---

My fault, I should have specified it has conservative and populist bias, and thanks for the other links. I don't think that his editorial policy 90 years ago must be seen as the current policy but, as you has shown, it seems to be far-right and fascist "friendly". I will edit my post to correct it.

It's not (only) a Russian narrative, is a narrative shared by a lot of journalists specialized in fascism.

The low number of openly fascist parliamentarians in Ukraine is often explained by the crypto-fascist stances of other political parties: glorification of past fascists, racism, ultranationalism, xenophobia...

And yes, Russia has a fascist problem, like most other European countries, and, as in Ukraine, the limited presence of fascists in parliament can be explained in the same way.

According to Wikipedia, de Telegraaf is the largest Dutch morning newspaper, and not specifies if it has a political bias has a conservative and populist bias and based in some articles, it's far-right and fascist "friendly". Also, it's not a spurious claim, it's based in the interview of a mercenary that was in the Ukrainian Army.

What is your source that is a spurious claim?

Edit: Clarify the bias (see answers)

Infographics

Also, Iraq partially sold oil in EUR from 2001 to 2003. In 2003 USA and friends started the second golf war, aka USA invasion of Iraq.

Just now has ended de Cuban representative: «A Imperialist and fascist aggression» , now starts de Nicaraguan

Live: UN Security Council Meeting: 10085th meeting - Threats to international peace and security

YDI.

According to this comment, there is a rule in that community about downvoting:

4. Don’t downvote because you disagree. Doing so repeatedly may result in a ban.

BTW, you should edit your post, all are bans of the !discuss@discuss.online community and are based in a community rule, not an instance rule. At least, I got the impression reading your post that it was an instance policy instead of a community one.

I would love to read the answer of Kaja Kallas to that question.

It seems the ban was reverted:

According to Kaja Kallas twit, "Mr. Maduro lacks legitimacy and [the EU] has defended a peaceful transition". In my book, this means support to the USA invasion/special operation.

Edit: typo

Death to EU, death to USA. All support to to the bolivarian movement against imperialism.

I live in a green state 😁 and using P2P since the release of GNUtella. 25 years sailing the high seas.

Not all the communities on lemmy world promotes liberalism :-)

The database used as source has some liberal takes, but in general, it has a high quality.

edit: shit this is a lib community

As a mod and bot OP, I feel insulted. [To clarify: joking]

PTB/CLM.

I think that "Mass downvoting" is a valid reason for a community ban, but I would expect a temp ban if it is not a repeating behavior.

But it isn't trolling by itself. That bad qualified ban could have a bad impact in others mods or admins evaluating the OP behavior.

May be in the future, communities should choose who can vote (subscribed, instance members or any user) and then only been show in the corresponding feeds. But I suspect that most of the mods that ban downvoters don't want that they community posts don't be shown in the All feed.

The Molotov-Riventtrop Pact was a nonaggression pact, not an alliance pact. Please, stop with the miss-information.

What's next?

Mao? He was born a 26 dec.

Bon català/Nice catalan 😂