my favorite part of that video is when he says (paraphrasing):
this is like a video call, and that's cool.. but we can do so much more.. like, we can ... have meetings
such vision :)
I spend my days in emacs and terminal emulators and I want this very badly in a laptop form factor so I can comfortably work outside.
I would argue that what's going on is that they are compressing information. And it just so happens that the most compact way to represent a generative system (like mathematical relations for instance) is to model their generative structure. For instance, it's much more efficient to represent addition by figuring out how to add two numbers, than by memorizing all possible combinations of numbers and their sum. So implicit in compression is the need to discover generalizations. But, the network has limited capacity and limited "looping power", and it doesn't really know what a number is, so it has to figure all this out by example and as a result will often come to approximate versions of these generalizations. Thus, it will often appear to be intelligent until it encounters something that doesn't quite fit whatever approximation it came up with and will suddenly get something wrong that seems outside the pattern that you thought it understood, because it's hard to predict what it's captured at a very deep level and what it only has surface concepts of.
In other words, I think it is "kind of" thinking, if thinking can be considered a kind of computation, but it doesn't always capture concepts completely because it's not quite good enough at generalizing what it's learned, but it's just good enough to appear really smart within a certain distribution of inputs.
Which, in a way, isn't so different from us, but is maybe not the same as how we learn and naturally integrate information.
How do people use the HTTP interface in production? I'm curious because I found it necessary to use a queue in production in order to handle many requests and smoothly scale up workers, yet every containerization approach I've seen uses this synchronous HTTP based approach. Are there any standard containerization methods that rely on queues instead ?
Apparently if people are gullible enough you can even use video calls to commit crimes, no AI needed!
It was through a video call – where only the photograph of a man who was the same as Minister Jackson, with a cap and glasses – was seen where the imposter began to give orders to the two workers, who work at night. First, they removed 50 laptops from the different floors of the ministry. https://newsrnd.com/news/2023-07-22--negro-chico---the-prisoner-who-posed-as-a-chilean-minister-and-put-the-boric-government-on-the-ropes.r1-S2_TOcn.html
Oh man brings back memories, I remember the song this was sampled from, from kids television in the 80s. Sesame Street maybe?
We use Notion at work and one thing that worries me is how the hell I'd make a local backup of all the data we're putting on there. If there were a way to import my Notion data into something like this it would make a fantastic solution.
I was using Jerboa because i was used to Sync for reddit. But, I got a bit tired of how rough around the edges it is, so I switched to just installing my Lemmy instance front page as Firefox "app" on my phone and realized it's not that bad as a UI, so sticking with it for now.
I'll probably try apps again in the future but I feel more open to "installing" good web apps now. Incidentally I tried the same trick with Reddit's mobile interface after Sync stopped working and realized it's also not so awful as I remembered. I did prefer Sync but I'll see how it goes with this method. So it's mobile web interfaces on Android for me for now.
Having said that, in both cases I think I'd prefer a more "simple HTML" type experience like old reddit over these dynamic SPA things they both have going.
Literally had a meeting with someone yesterday who, after starting late because of trouble logging in and things crashing, started off the meeting by apologizing for using Teams but said it was just easier because it's the default. Made me chuckle.
Anyone who chooses Teams because they actually think it's better.. I just.. are we even using the same program?
How do you block people using a VPN by region? Just block the whole VPN?
Maybe. I'm interested in the specifics.
likely violate that data’s usage agreement.
It doesn't seem to be too common for books to include specific clauses or EULAs that prohibit their use as data in machine learning systems. I'm curious if there are really any aspects that cover this without it being explicitly mentioned. I guess we'll find out.
I just noticed that my subscription to m/machinelearning is showing "no posts" despite the "magazine" being full of posts if i browse to kbin.social. Must be related.
really curious about contracts. It seems from the example that they are a runtime thing so what is the advantage over just putting some checks in your code at the top and bottom of the function? Does it allow the compiler to help infer compile time conditions at all?
Let's say I have a context manager that provides a resource that then mutates on exit:
``` from contextlib import contextmanager
@contextmanager def context(): x = ['hi'] yield x x[0] = 'there' ```
I found that if I want to make another context class that uses this, such that the context (before mutation) is valid, I have to pass it in:
``` class Example1: def init(self, obj): self.obj = obj def use_obj(self): print(self.obj) def enter(self): print("start") return self def exit(self, *exc): print("end")
with context() as x: with Example1(x) as y: y.use_obj() ```
prints:
start ['hi'] end
However, what I don't like is, let's say that obj is an internal detail of my class. I don't want the user to have to define it beforehand and pass it in.
The only way I can figure how to do this is by calling the context manager's __enter__() explicitly:
``` class Example2: def use_obj(self): print(self.obj) def enter(self): print("start") self.ctx = context() self.obj = self.ctx.enter() return self def exit(self, *exc): print("end") self.ctx.exit(None, None, None)
with Example2() as y: y.use_obj() ```
which also prints,
start ['hi'] end
For comparison, just as some other random attempt, the following doesn't work because the context ends when self.obj is created:
``` class Example3: def use_obj(self): print(self.obj) def enter(self): print("start") with context() as x: self.obj = x return self def exit(self, *exc): print("end")
with Example3() as y: y.use_obj() ```
which prints,
start ['there'] end
Okay, so my point is that Example2 is the right solution here. But, it's really ugly. So my question is, is there a better way to write Example2?
I-JEPA learns by creating an internal model of the outside world, which compares abstract representations of images (rather than comparing the pixels themselves).
Nice, only 3 days old too. Great minds think alike :P
Thanks for pointing that out to me.
An idea that just occurred to me. I was looking for communities on machine learning to join, so I searched https://browse.feddit.de/ and found a bunch. They don't have much content but together they have at least 4 or 5 posts each, which adds up to a few posts, so I subscribed to all of them.
However, now I have no way of "grouping" them so that I can view posts of all communities in my feed related to the topic of machine learning.
I was wondering if some concept of "super communities" could be interesting for Lemmy, similar to "multireddits". People could curate their collection of favourite communities around a topic, over multiple instances, and users could easily subscribe and browse the whole bunch of them.
Thought it might be nice to back this up in case the subreddit goes dark.
I would be happy to use another instance but my account is on this one. Is there a way to migrate an account, or perhaps "link" accounts on multiple instances somehow?
So, I'm in Jerboa right now, and when I click that link it opens in the browser. Is there a way to write urls that open communities in Jerboa directly?
I wish I could click on links there and have them open in Jerboa.
While I agree that porting one of these great reddit clients to a new platform like Lemmy is the way to go, I don't see why it should be done by the individual developer instead of treated as a community effort. We'll just end up in the same boat again where he's piggy backing on another project (Lemmy, etc) to build a closed-source business that only he profits from. And while I have no problem with people selling apps they wrote, if none of these developers are going to open source their work so that the community can participate, I'd rather see a longer term effort go into improving FOSS solutions.