Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)PR
Posts
1
Comments
143
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I don't know what the state of either is on a Sony 10 IV, but the answer is almost certainly Lineage. It's the more mature project, and it's way more likely to work. And at the risk of getting on a high horse, Lineage's unfortunate but necessary (if you actually want your phone to work) reliance on proprietary blobs is already bad enough; I certainly wouldn't trust my privacy to a project like Sailfish, which I understand to be partially closed source.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Brendan Eich. Specifically his stance against same sex marriage. He was pressured to resign from Mozilla, which he cofounded, due to his support of California's prop 8. Then he founded Brave. The Brave browser also has some annoying crypto and AI features turned on by default. I think it's a perfectly fine piece of software. I use it as a second browser.

  • Yeah, I agree. "Stuttering" doesn't sound like a touchpad-specific issue. My guess is there's something funny about Fedora, either drivers or kernel flags or default plasma settings, that just isn't playing well with that specific device. I wouldn't be surprised if another distro magically fixes it.

    Edit: Or there's a hardware issue. Gnome caused the device to grind to a halt?

  • I'm intrigued, but I'd need to know more. Do I have to be an "accredited investor"? Would we be buying the entire airline, debt and all, or just its assets? How are day-to-day decisions handled; surely there will be some kind of leadership structure rather than pure democracy on the smaller details, right? And if there is, is democracy enough to prevent corruption, like we've seen in the supposedly democratic American government, or has there been any thought to the game theory behind the bylaws? I know they're not collecting actual money yet, but what are the chances this whole thing is a scam?

  • I'm somewhere in the U.S. Our local politicians suck. I want to relocate. I supported someone last election cycle who was opposed to flock cameras, but they've completely fallen in lockstep with the established authoritarians since taking office. So I have been trying to avoid flock cameras on my route to work. But every time I find a minor detour, a new camera pops up. And even then, many of those detours are through residential neighborhoods, where every third person is a collaborator has a ring camera. My current route has me circling around the entire town before slipping back in on the other side. My commute has gone from ~20 minutes to ~40 minutes each way, which is just barely within my tolerance before I throw in the towel. There are several businesses I won't even go to anymore, either because every possible route is surveilled, or because the business owners actively work against my interests (e.g. Whole Foods), which is actually good, since I find myself rabidly supporting local businesses, just as I should have been doing all along.

  • I mean, you don't necessarily need a fresh Arch install; I'd wager you could just switch to Arch in place by editing your /etc/pacman.conf and /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist to Arch repos. You'd probably need to keep a Manjaro section at the bottom of pacman.conf to avoid breaking too many things at first. Is this a good idea? Probably not, but it'd be fun to try.

  • My wife wanted Linux on her tablet. She read online that Gnome was the preferred DE on touchscreens. I warned her that I personally dislike Gnome, but it's not like I'm going to throw a minimal window manager at her, so I told her that's fine and she should try it out.

    Since I'm her tech support, I installed Garuda, a distro I already use. She played around with it, then asked if she could have desktop icons. It was stupid that she had to press a whole extra button just to see her "home screen", she said. So I installed the desktop icons gnome extension, but it lacks basic features like either right click or drag, or maybe both. I can't recall at the moment.

    Then the onscreen keyboard wouldn't appear automatically when using certain programs like Brave. And using the stylus to press the OSK would close it entirely. The stylus was really fidgety and oversensitive, too. I have zero touchscreen experience on Linux, so I was disappointed with gnome's lack of GUI controls to fix these kinds of things.

    She started to complain that Linux is too hard, then signed up for the 1 year extended Windows 10 support on her old laptop.

    So I reinstalled Garuda with KDE this time, told her I tried something new, and she's been happy with it so far. Turns out my wife just hates Gnome. And she expressed this hate completely unprompted.

    That's right, my love; fuck Gnome.

    I've never been more proud.

  • In my area, most drivers don't start the turn signal until they've reached the intersection or have already started the turn. Infuriates me to no end. This is also true for left turns at red lights; they don't activate their turn signals until they stop, sometimes not even until the green light, so you have no chance to change lanes before they block you.

  • This is good stuff; your argument is well reasoned. Brings me back to my Bible study days.

    I still think "all hierarchies" might be overbroad. The Bible itself prescribes elders/bishops and deacons to administer the church, for instance, and it's radical enough regarding obedience to authority that, in my experience, modern day theologically conservative churches trend toward authoritarianism and mostly unchecked abuse of power more often than not. This would have been contemporaneous with the communes.

    As for the more heavenly hierarchies, I looked back at some of the points of evidence that I was going to bring up here that I thought supported my case, but the "outer darkness" in Matthew 22 I once thought might not necessarily be hell sure seems like hell upon rereading, and as for the parable of the unforgiving servant who was sent to the "torturers" despite his debts being forgiven, it looks like that word "torturers" is connected to jailers, i.e. debtors' prison, so I can't argue confidently that the servant was "saved" from anything and given a different punishment instead. There are still a few passages I can't totally square though:

    The parable of the prodigal son (Luke 15:11-32): He gets welcomed back into the family, and he sure seems saved in the sense that I think most Christians would read into it, but his inheritance is spent; he doesn't get more. All the father has belongs to the other son.

    The purifying fire of 1 Corinthians 3:9-15: Both groups of people are explicitly "saved". One is rewarded, the other suffers loss.

    The parable of the talents/minas: In the Matthew 25 version of the parable, the first two servants get the same reward (authority over "many things"). No issue there. But in the Luke 19 version, the rewards are proportional. And the one with 10 minas gets a bonus at the end.

    That's as far as I got before my eyes glazed over.

  • Learn Programming @programming.dev

    Why can't I get eww to load this literal variable?