palordrolap @ palordrolap @fedia.io

Some middle-aged guy on the Internet. Seen a lot of it, occasionally regurg

---

Read more

Posts

1

Comments

1,403

Joined

1 yr. ago

Sounds like a perfect opportunity to bring the court case forward, and when he inevitably doesn't turn up (not that he would have if everything ran to the original timetable), make the finding in absentia, presumably "guilty" but at least worse than it would be if he'd bothered to turn up, and then...

Sanctions? Heck. What else do we have to hold him to account? An ever bigger tariffs war? Forcibly close US embassies and consulates? Seize US assets?

It'd be a fine line to prevent the Big (cutter of) Cheese from bugging out and declaring war.

Because LMDE stands for Linux Mint Debian Edition

Interesting. LMDE seems to be more like MS Windows in that things like kernel updates insist on a reboot, and certain other things are easiest restarted with a reboot too, for example, X.Org changes.

I'm sure there's still a way to bootstrap a new kernel on the bare metal without needing to reboot, likewise for restarting X.Org, but I foresee problems with any programs and daemons that were children of the original processes. For example, convincing them not to exit when their parent does and then getting them to play nice under a new session.

I mean, I guess you could just not update, or have a long period where they're unnecessary and that'd work too. That could well be what this meme is getting at. Can confirm sessions (caveat: with standby and hibernate) that have lasted well over a month.

But this all raises the question: Does anyone actually not reboot when system changes happen, and what's the workflow for bootstrapping without rebooting there?

In before Microsoft break out the FUD tactics and a year or two of cheap licenses.

Any where stress doesn't affect me negatively.

People with a serious criminal record. Murderers and worse. Those who leave their victims alive but scarred mentally or physically.

Then those with less serious criminal records. Fraud. White collar crimes. That sort of thing.

Then other "undesirables" depending on who isn't liked by whoever's in charge.

And then the goalposts for what's desirable will start to move.

And the scope won't just be limited to social media. Websites will be categorised further. Some might remain open access to all people (except the ever increasing list of those to be protected and those who shouldn't have access) but others? No. Those sites themselves are undesirable.

Who's next to be blocked?

I mean, now that the infrastructure and policies are in place, it's only a matter of time.

Dear friend, an SSL error has occurr'd;
The server's response, regrettably, deferr'd;
The connexion there, I fear, is insecure;
We understand, dear friend, if you might demur

Sigh. At this rate I can see a day where I end up switching to WebKitGTK's MiniBrowser as my main rather than having it as a "secret" backup.

Your former colleagues see your potential but do not see, or choose not to see, the rest of you. The rest of you that's messy. The rest of you that cannot operate at a high level for long periods. The rest of you that's just f--king done.

Your former colleagues have stamina in spades - or at least, more than you do - and imagine a perfect individual that combines their stamina with your enviable potential.

But, that person does not exist. Or at least, if they do, that person isn't you.

There's no point running yourself into the ground trying to meet an ideal that only exists in the minds of other people.

Don't buy into their idealism. At least, not until you're sure you can be the person they think you can be.

Source: I was in a similar situation, but kept going, burned out and am not OK.

4'33" by John Cage

Preferably with me as far from the stage as possible. In fact, I'm staying home. Enjoy.

Because he's been on Russia's payroll for a while (and likely his dad too), so like a stopped clock being right twice a day, when Don Jr. suggests that the US is thinking about not supporting an enemy of Russia, it might be worth thinking there's some truth to it.

Tea. Specifically, what's known in other parts of the world as "English Breakfast (Black) Tea". Because I'm British and grew up with it.

Although I vary quite a bit from average. Mine's usually decaffeinated with sweetener and soy milk for health reasons.

All forms of ampersand are based on "Et", Latin for "and", so cheat and use the backwards 3 (for E) forms.

The simplest puts a vertical bar through the backwards 3 like a relative of the dollar sign, and the other adds a t to it so that the middle point and the bottom line of the backwards 3 join up with the crossbar and base of the t. Bonus points for drawing that latter one without lifting your pen, but you're doing well if you still have to extend the t's crossbar after the fact.

Or really cheat and use the plus sign. That's just the t from "Et", but in the right context, most people instinctively understand it + will know what you mean.

It's also my experience that KPatience doesn't skip unwinnable games. It also occasionally generates one where it can't determine whether the game is solvable or not, which is probably due to search space limitations. I've won a couple of those, but they're risky to start in the first place!

I can see the logic for not skipping unsolvable games.

KPat uses a seed system (called "Numbered Deals") to "shuffle" the cards before a game. The seed can be generated (pseudo-)randomly, which is the default, or entered manually. In theory, a manually-entered seed could be unsolvable, and there would then need to be completely different logic flow for random and manual seeds after the shuffle and deal.

It's way simpler to just generate a new game seed randomly as necessary and then have the rest of the program be clueless as to whether it was typed in or not.

This is one of those things that's going to depend heavily on the sort of people the parents are, and to some extent the (adult) children.

I remember the first Christmas I woke in my own home rather than my bedroom at my parents' house and I was simultaneously devastated and glad that my parents hadn't broken into my home (I lived across town) to leave gifts in a pillowcase. The tradition was that it was put at the foot of the bed (or outside the door as I got older).

I was well into my 20s before I moved out, so I have no idea how long that would have continued if I'd never left. It might have required me to ask them explicitly to not do that any more.

Now I go over at some point over Christmas and we exchange gifts during the main day, or as close as possible to it.

You do not want to see an old-school greybeard dressing like this.

You might think you do when you first imagine the concept, but no, you really don't.

Source: Am at the very least greybeard adjacent.

This. Anything that's recognisably from a previous era, even if it's just a hairstyle or a fashion trend, can be a re-enactment of that era if someone knowingly and willingly chooses to style themselves that way.

There's a version of the game out there that someone made after the fact (well after; we're talking 2020), but I couldn't get it to accept my commands. Not even the ones it suggests in the intro screen. I'd post a link, but it might be someone's idea of a sick joke.

If I had spare cash I'd definitely be donating to Archive.org (The Internet Archive), so instead, I try to mention them when topics like this come up.

I'd probably also donate to Linux Mint, who I assume are also non-profit, because I've been using their offerings for a long while at this point.