Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)OT
Posts
10
Comments
3,481
Joined
2 yr. ago

Permanently Deleted

Jump
  • The water on the other water makes the other water wet, and vice versa

    Coming at it from a colloquial definition and not a chemist's definition, though. And I prefer the colloquial definition of "wet".

  • laws

    Damages

    guilty

    morally convict

    crime

    ...lol

    What are you going on about?

    The reason I kept showing you the same comment is because you said things like "I'm deeply confused" and asking me what I'm saying.

    I'm not even arguing with you. But you seem to be putting a lot of effort into reading an argument into what I'm saying. Is this how you enjoy spending your time on social media? Lol

  • Why do you keep using words like "accuse" and "guilty"? Lol

    Nintendo benefitted financially from piracy and made no efforts to hide the fact that they obtained games through the exact same methods that pirates use.

    This is what I'm saying. I'm not even sure why you seem to be trying to make this a fight or an argument or something. "Tire you out"? Lol

  • I’m asking you to clearly formulate what it is that you’re accusing Nintendo of.

    For the third time...

    Nintendo benefitted financially from piracy and made no efforts to hide the fact that they obtained games through the exact same methods that pirates use.

    Which part is unclear to you? Lol

    Source, in case you're unfamiliar with this funny thing they did

  • What are you confused about?

    I don't understand what your angle is. It feels like you're really trying to win an argument, except you seem to be the only one arguing.

    I've been trying to sort out a misunderstanding, and it looks like you're trying to win something. The misunderstanding is sorted out. So, I guess you win, too?

  • No, I've understood this whole time that you're saying "Nintendo is legally allowed to do this with their own games".

    What I'm saying is "Nintendo benefitted from their game having been pirated because they downloaded and sold the exact version of the game that someone illegally pirated".

    Nintendo didn't do anything illegal. Someone did something illegal, and Nintendo saved time and effort (and therefore money too) because of the illegal thing that someone did.

  • Ok, I see now.

    I was saying that they benefitted from other people pirating their games.

    You thought I meant that they benefitted from pirating their own games.

    I can see how what I wrote could be interpreted that way. But no, I meant that they benefitted from their games having been pirated in the past by pirates.

  • What I said in my last comment was

    Nintendo benefitted financially from piracy and made no efforts to hide the fact that they obtained games through the exact same methods that pirates use.

    I'm not sure why this didn't satisfy your pedantry before, but maybe you didn't read it when you replied to it last time.