I would agree with you, if it wasn't for the apple people trying to push everyone to join the cult because of the walled garden
oh yay, a techno dystopia, just wait for the repo men after you miss your heart payment
public spending has nothing to do with being able to use it, especially for free.
you're not getting free corn, nor free medicine, even tho both are heavily publically funded.
Fact is, the Manhattan metro area can't support the amount of people commuting via care as there were.
look at you lefty, calling everyone you don't like a Nazi again. don't you know this is why people become Nazis? just because he was filling the trains to the death camps doesn't make him a bad person, in fact he most likely grew up on a farm, so he's actually a working class hero.
even worse, it's a joke, but it's true, the proof of concept is often also the final product
you realize that even the "cheap" Chinese cars from BYD and the like are still more than many people can pay for a car, there is no used EV market
I mean, that's assuming you can afford an electric car, being poor is expensive
the American was not ready to hear what he heard
why would market electricity prices have any relation to what you pay on your power bill? turns out that companies will charge whatever they know they can, regardless of the cost of acquiring something to sell, should the cost of something be more than they know they can sell it for, they just won't sell it.
The idea that market prices influence what you pay for something is basically one of the main lies of supply side economics.
Capitalism was the one main force pushing for the end of slavery at the Contemporaneous Age. It’s basically the reason most of the world doesn’t have it anymore.
nope, ironically it wasn't the capitalist institutions, but rather religious institutions that called for an end to slavery
an easy election victory over a deeply unpopular racist, sexist, homophobic oligarchically unapologetic candidate.
hate to be the one to break it too you, but that candidate is far from deeply unpopular, it's just factually not true.
even less so,
"According to Young, though, the ultra-wealthy traditionally haven't migrated in droves following such tax hikes. Only %2.4 of U.S.-based millionaires move across state lines each year, roughly %15 of whom apparently do so for tax reasons. 'So it's like a small l fraction of a small fraction,' Young said.
https://sociology.cornell.edu/news/final-reading-flight-myth
Under current economic conditions, economic wealth is necessary for the functioning of the economy
is it required? to an extent, yes. but do we need 60% of everything to be owned by 10% of the population?
As for the Capital flight, that is a myth, even the implementation of straight wealth taxes don't see great multimillionaire migrations, because taxation isn't a very strong factor, in fact a golf course or tow is a stronger pull, example Scotland vs Ireland when the UK was still part of the EU saw more ultra wealthy live in Scotland, a region with a higher tax rate, than Ireland, primarily for golf courses.
ok, why should I care about the well off not getting to be quite the leaches they are now?
Opensuse has Mold on it because someone forgot it in an office locker.
IDK, you want to run by your statement again and get back to me?
in a technical sense? yes.
in a practical sense? it's superficial, generally without any actual actions to address anything about it. they will praise a company for plopping rainbows on everything ONLY during the exact days of pride month while funding Christian gay conversion camps
everyone has a few slaves in their emerald mines, why are you getting upset?
oh ya, I too forgot that black president existed. who in an act of pure bipartisan appeasement decided to create the Affordable Care Act that we have today instead