Tbh it's not like Starmer is that great on trans rights generally. "Not as transphobic as the Tories" is a pretty low bar.
I suppose he's at least unlikely to actively worsen things.
Yeah, you're not wrong. I just need to frame what I think they should do so I can judge them more effectively.
They just need to let it die. Exorbitant expense aside, it's just so bloated at this point - if they want to keep going, a streamlined and rationalised EUV is the way to go.
French rpg magazine, apparently: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casus_Belli_(magazine)?wprov=sfla1
Fab, thanks. Aye, does sound more micro heavy, but at least the entire population of China will no longer try to use my Lanfang's railways and scupper industrialisation.
That's neat. Have they done the same for transportation? Always seemed bizarre that railways could provide transportation to railway-less states.
The first one's good fun, in a rather daft way, I hear the sequel is not so great tho
It's an old Zoolander reference - there's a whole bit where the big conspiracy is explained to the title character, and he repeats the question "why male models?" even though it's just been explained why in excruciating detail.
...I should probably use less obscure references, but it seemed like a good idea at the time.
Thanks for this. This is the most insightful, thoughtful piece I've seen on corporate and queer rights in, like... ever, honestly. (And I can't get over the fact it's in response to an NCD meme!)
Label all drones funded this way with "From Russia with love x"
What is this bizarreness from?