Skip Navigation
LLM's are just as revolutionary as Automated Assembly Lines were.
  • This is a very bad take. LLM's, appear to be at their limit. They're autocomplete and are only as good as their inputs. They can't be depended on for truth. They can't be trusted to even do math.

    LLM's work as a place to bounce things off of, but still require editorial work afterword, even when they are working their best.

    LLM's take huge amounts of power, both to make run, keep running, and to correct their output.

    In general LLM's don't significantly reduce labor, and they are still ~very costly~.

    Even the most basic assembly line multiplies someones output. The best assembly lines remove almost all human labor. Even bad assembly lines are wholesale better than individual assembly.

    As long as it's LLM, I don't believe it will ever be "useful". We need a different technology to make this sort of assistance useful.

  • Apologizing for something you already knew was wrong seems pointless.
  • I am in this situation with a family member. I asked for an apology for their behavior, and I got the flippant "I'm sorry" and "can we move on." The reality is I'm.. unable to move on until the situation is settled. "I require an apology for your behavior, both in words showing you understand why this is a problem, and the appropriate change of action."

    We are still trying to sort this out. It may not go well. WHEEEEEEEE

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)NE
    nerobro @fedia.io
    Posts 0
    Comments 3