Skip Navigation
Uh, how am I supposed to kill 8 bile spewers if they don't spawn?
  • For that one, I just did a killbox on 6, had the PO done in like 5 minutes... I think the spewers are pretty much guaranteed on those missions but I can't be sure since I 1) typically avoid killbox missions, and 2) prefer fighting bots over bugs

  • Linux back at 4.04% on the Desktop. Windows went below 73%
  • I believe it can do CLI, but that's not always been the case and not a lot of CLI apps adopted it as a result

    But for most of what the typical user, or even a lot of what a technical user, needs, it does a good job

  • Linux back at 4.04% on the Desktop. Windows went below 73%
  • Did Matt try putting the regular build on a newish machine? That's what I did with my current and was struggling until I put the latest kernel on it, should have gone with Edge, but had little trouble after)

  • Linux back at 4.04% on the Desktop. Windows went below 73%
  • I don't get them putting Mint down either, and I've built multiple Gentoo systems... I don't need an easy distro but still use Mint and like it for what it brings (basically, it's Green Ubuntu, what Ubuntu was supposed to be before they lost their way)

  • Linux back at 4.04% on the Desktop. Windows went below 73%
  • I dunno, longer than 6 years, which is about how long it took for Skylake to go from brand new to not being supported by the new version of Windows?

    And I honestly can't think of a time that's even happened before when you could get 10 running on 10+ year old processors as long as they were powerful enough. And the difference between a Core 2 Duo and a Skylake i7 is vastly more than between the Skylake i7 and the current generation.

    The issue is not that the hardware stops getting support, either... It's that the hardware is expressly and needlessly being blocked long before it's no longer useful. My old Skylake is now 9 years old and more than capable of running as a moderate power machine on current workloads, other than being forcibly blocked to encourage me to put it in a landfill so I can continue the consumer march for more stuff to feed the corpos.

    It's wasteful. And for the most part, all that's needed is for the old drivers to be allowed to function. And to make things like TPM 2 be optional, especially considering I don't think you're even required to actually use it for Windows 11, just have it.

  • Bill Gates says not to worry about AI's energy draw
  • Climate scientists: "do these things to fix climate change"
    Everyone: "but that's HAAARD and I don't wanna!"
    AI developers: create AI
    Climate scientists: "AI is drawing massive power accelerating climate change, we need to stop that"
    Everyone: "but it can tell us how to fix climate change so it's going to be okay!"
    AI climate model: "do these same things to fix climate change"
    Everyone: "but that's HAAARD and I don't wanna!"

    Yeah, I can't see any way this could possibly fail...

  • People doing the 30 days linux Challenge are having several problems because of Mint's old packages and technology. Why people still recommend it when there is Fedora and Opensuse with KDE and Gnome?
  • It is not randomly frozen as Mint does follow Ubuntu's LTS releases, every new version they put out is based on whatever the current Ubuntu LTS is. Their release cadence isn't linked that closely as a new LTS usually takes a few months to spawn a new Mint release based on it, but they aren't just freezing some arbitrary point in time of development.

    If you mean Ubuntu is randomly frozen, it isn't either. It follows a release schedule, determines a roadmap, and at a certain predetermined point in developing a new release, they do freeze for new versions so they can complete testing and ensure everything works together in time to release on schedule. It's certainly not "random".

    And that's also not what stability means. Stability means functionality doesn't change, so an up to date Mint 21.3 installed on release is going to be the same as one installed and updated now, functionally speaking. This is accomplished by only backporting important security patches and bug fixes to the version of the software that's used by the system rather than getting it with new versions where there are new features and changes to existing functionality that can break things based on the previous version. This does not mean it gets all fixes, just the ones they deem worth the effort of backporting.

  • People doing the 30 days linux Challenge are having several problems because of Mint's old packages and technology. Why people still recommend it when there is Fedora and Opensuse with KDE and Gnome?
  • But it's not randomly frozen, it's tied to Ubuntu's LTS builds. And they didn't say "stable" is the same as "works well", they said Mint is both (which is true from my experience at least)

    If you need newer packages with Mint, Flatpak is a good way to go (yes it has its own issues, but they do work well for a lot of people)

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)LA
    laurelraven @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    Posts 0
    Comments 734