The first 2 lines of my previous comment focuses on your other rule issue.

This is none of the things in your list using the proper definition of gossip.

Coming in hot

I was suggesting you should pause before acting because you were confidently incorrect about the definition of the word gossip.

Tired of being a doctor -- time to start my media pundit career!

maybe he had a Keith Richards family member who wanted to get drunk on their remains.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2007/apr/04/drugsandalcohol.musicnews#:~:text=In a wide-ranging interview,%2C" he told NME magazine.

casual or unconstrained conversation or reports about other people, typically involving details that are not confirmed as being true.

The actual non-assumed definition of 'gossip' ^

From the rules:

All posts must be news articles.

From the post:

abcnews.go.com

QED

I'm not sure where you went wrong, but maybe take a few minutes before coming in so hot next time

maybe it's what pumps him up

yeah but that just kicks the can down the road, not that I disagree or anything. I don't know of any real solution.

The United States is also a one-party state but, with typical American extravagance, they have two of them.

• Julius Nyerere

Do arduino stuff or look up chips with those cortexm0 arm processors. Like these: https://www.adafruit.com/product/3403

I don't know -- It feels like we should be able to use the internet to make grass roots new and hard to corrupt political movements but I don't see that happening at all.

There's also the 250 year empire rule which we're at now against stability with the current system.

I honestly have no answer other than a "vote or die" but we all know that doesn't work.

pretty big talk for a people that think curry is an Indian food and still use vinegar as a fried food condiment :P

And just for the record -- Butter, nor sugar, are spices ...

end citizens united -- corporations aren't people

end lobbying so shell oil doesn't have 10000000X time and money to affect the government as a person does.

Quit assigning good/bad labels to companies that operate within the law and furious pursue laws that make us more equal, richer and safer overall

???

profit

isn't that the point? The corruption has tricked us to believing they can regulate themselves or are even not amoral about social issues. Companies make profit -- that is their singular goal. The laws and regulations control their behavior, not 'good will' or whatever we pretend motivates individuals

?

It's distributed under the GNU General Public License v2 (or any later version) - see the accompanying COPYING file for more details.

https://www.indy100.com/media-library/picture.jpg?id=28050222&width=1245&height=700&quality=85&coordinates=65%2C0%2C65%2C0

is it not open source? That helps to decentralize power though powerful figures can still appear in those spaces too, like (benevolent) Torvalds on the Linux kernel

e: yeah https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio

absolute power corrupts absolutely. It's not that those softwares are noble, they're just decentralized. I will say it's impressive that Tor doesn't have some people pulling the strings trying to take over (but it's probably the NSA right?)

sounds like carteling more than monopoly but maybe that's just a sub category

wow haven't seen antipope in a long time

I make this every week because you can't buy white bread without a billion preservatives and whatnot https://www.theflavorbender.com/japanese-milk-bread-recipe-hokkaido-milk-bread/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suge_Knight

to be fair, he was attempting satire -- he is 'switching sides' and now wants a felon to run the country.

They're so bad at everything lol WOOSH on satire