I heard it was shipping libraries that capture all clipboard data and sent it to foreign servers unencrypted, and that this was being defended in the buglist as a feature, so I might actually skip this one at least until the first or second batch of security updates rolls on.
For servers, it makes not much difference for me; where possible I either stick to Stable + Backports (which requires Backports in the first place) or jump right to Unstable.
I'll be considering it, but if I have to deal with paid services in this good year of Arceus of 2025 I'd prefer them to at least deal with my national currency directly, or fall within my country's jurisdiction.
I've made an exception for SDF simply because 1.- they're awesome and 2.- the payment is one-time-only.
Looks paid, I prefer to discard any possible solutions on my country's currency before I even take a look at having to deal with international KYC shit.
Pues deberían trabajar en mejorar esa faceta comunicativa, porque desde acá se ve que cuando sale el personero de turno a dar el reporte, la única cifra de la que sí están tan seguros como para aseverar a todo micrófono es "estamos perdiendo XXX trillones por día que estamos cerrados".
Eso sin mencionar que aparentemente prefirieron cerrar o cortar las medidas de seguridad de tener los refugios subterráneos, que simplemente pagar un (1) salario de un guardia para que se encargue de tener el lugar vigilado.
...¿Acaba el ex ministro de minería de declarar en televisión que no hubiesen luchado para rescatar a los mineros en el caso de San José si no hubiese habido gente que auditara y que vigilara a la empresa?
En el contexto de lo que están diciendo los familiares de los afectados en el ahora caso El Teniente, suena harto sospechoso. Y varias autoridades están diciendo "más tarde buscamos culpables, mañana".
My usual concern with force redirecting people to "where the stuff is popular" is that it promotes centralization, which is the literal opposite of why we're here. Besides, as I've commented some other times, the feasibility of user participation is not transitive across instances. !soccer@sports.xyz might have a completely different rules, mood or culture than !soccer@euro.pe , or the redirect might lead to !soccer@ya.ml which is blocked in my country or otherwise made unavailable. (I am using examples here ofc but I guess this could very well hit people in and around feddit.uk, for one).
There is literally no punishment for keeping a community open so it can sometime either grow organically or die organically. Locking them however, fully prevents either option.
If they are locked, the people who come here and see them locked will go elsewhere instead of contributing, because they literally can't.
Some people came here to creat communities (eg.: in the wake of Reddit stuff) with the hope that it would catch on. But we can't expect them to do all the work.
La idea de estirar la línea 4A ("línea 10" en sus mallas de planes si mal no recuerdo) no es mala, considerando que se puede hacer como línea "express" por Macul (futura L8), P.Egaña (L3), Príncipe de Gales, Escuela Militar (L1) y la futura estación de la L7 en Alonso de Córdova. Quedaría como un súper-conector que permitiría evacuar gente desde la línea 1 y 7 a la 3 y 4 que hacen el recorrido "paralelo".
Aunque viendo lo lenta que iba la obra general vial en Santos Ossa cuando pasé por ahí a principios de año, me temo que para que veamos tales obras terminadas, Chile saldrá bicampeón de la siguiente copa Centenario...
I heard it was shipping libraries that capture all clipboard data and sent it to foreign servers unencrypted, and that this was being defended in the buglist as a feature, so I might actually skip this one at least until the first or second batch of security updates rolls on.
For servers, it makes not much difference for me; where possible I either stick to Stable + Backports (which requires Backports in the first place) or jump right to Unstable.