jnarical @ jnarical @ttrpg.network

Posts

3

Comments

29

Joined

2 yr. ago

Meta-communities in two flawors:

• user/UI-based, where the user can create an entry in his preferences, add a bunch of communities there and set which one will be its "facade". The main "con" here that every single user should do a lot of work by himself
• server-based, where you can create new meta-community, add your own community there, and send invites to all similar communities to join. Every community that joined could(should?) be removed from discovery, but be visible as "nested". Search by its name should lead to meta-community. Ownership of meta-community should belong to its members in term that not a single one could delete it or make any harm. Meta-community exists while there's at least one member in it.

Important part that one to be careful about combining feeds. Small cozy community can just dissolve in valley of posts from much larger one. The thing is controversial, on one hand it's really handy to see all the posts all at once, on the other hand - it can kill smaller communities, as their creators will lose the sense and desire to have them maintained. There are different solutions:

Meta-communities in two flawors:

• user/UI-based, where the user can create an entry in his preferences, add a bunch of communities there and set which one will be its "facade". The main "con" here that every single user should do a lot of work by himself
• server-based, where you can create new meta-community, add your own community there, and send invites to all similar communities to join. Every community that joined could(should?) be removed from discovery, but be visible as "nested". Search by its name should lead to meta-community. Ownership of such meta-community should belong to its members in term that not a single one could delete it or make any harm. Meta-community exists while there's at least one member in it. Picture of meta-community in discovery could be anything, one can take it from most populated member community, but user could be able to change it in his preferences to any other member.

Important part that one to be careful about combining feeds. Small cozy community can just dissolve in valley of posts from much larger ones. The thing is controversial, on one hand it's really handy to see all the posts all at once, on the other hand - it can kill smaller communities, as their creators will lose the sense and desire to have them maintained. There are different solutions:

• Make feed combined, but give posts from smaller community higher priority
• Make user to switch feed manually and let hit set "default" to show when you open meta-community
• Give user a choice between two

To me, manual changing feeds feels more healthy for a smaller ones.

You can create post here, dedicated to your hack. DW subreddit isn't accessible now, I've managed to reach your old post there via cached search page but it's kinda unrelialable :)

https://yandexwebcache.net/yandbtm?fmode=inject&tm=1688821683&tld=ru&lang=en&la=1637162624&text=dungeon+world+mixed+adventure&url=https%3A//www.reddit.com/r/DungeonWorld/comments/itwdrw/mixed_adventures_a_dungeon_world_hack/&l10n=ru&mime=html&sign=fe61b9da0fa935cf89133a9f72bae4b1&keyno=0

Can you share mage playbook? Never mind, I've taken it from cached reddit page)))

Yes! If I want some kind of mage/spellcaster in my game, I go for Unlimited Dungeons variant. Bot DW and HbW mage variants are disappointedly limited

https://spoutinglore.blogspot.com/2018/07/homebrew-world.html

upd: hit points in DW is like plot armor, it's not about health state explicitly

I prefer Homebrew World, it's like Dungeon World 2.0 in many cases, but it's for sure tailored for oneshots or short campaigns. There are also DW: Unlimited Dungeons which shares some similarities with HbW, and Stonetop in its early access stage

It would be more visible on the communities page, I support this too

Oh! My! God! I was getting downvotes and didn't even knew why! It's much better now, really.