It needs to be more trustworthy. If I have to double check everything, I still have to figure out how to do whatever it's doing, then figure out how it's doing the thing, then verify if it did it right. By then, I could have just done it in step 1.5 probably.
I just think this is patently false. Or at least there are/were orgs where cloud costs so much more than running their own servers that are tended by maybe 1 FTE across a bunch of admins mostly doing other tasks.
Let me just point out one recent comparison - we were considering cloud backup for a couple petabytes of data, with a few hundred GB changing or adding / restoring every week or less. I think the best deal, where we held the software costs equal was $5/TB/Month.
This is catastrophically more expensive over a 10 year lifespan of a server or two and a small/mid sized LTO9 tape library and tapes. For one thing, we'd have paid more than the server etc in about a year. After that, tape prices have always tended down over time, and the storage costs for us for tape is basically $0 once in archive storage. We put it in a cabinet in another building - and you can fit A LOT of data in these tapes in a small room. That'll cost basically $0 additional for 20 years, forget about 10. So let's add in electricity etc - I still have doubts those will be over ~$100k over the lifetime of the project. Labor is about a wash cause you still need people to manage the backups to the cloud, and I think actually moving tapes might be ~.05 FTE in our situation. Literally anyone can be taught how to do it once the backup admin puts the tapes in the hopper or tells them which serial # to put in the hopper.
I also think that many companies are finding something similar for straight servers - at least it was in the news quite a bit for a while. Now, if you can be entirely cloud native - maybe it washes out, but for large groups of people that's still not possible due to controlling hardware (think factory,scientific, etc)or existing desktop software for which the cloud isn't really a replacement and throughput isn't great (think Adobe products, video, scientific, financial etc data).
Though it's more work with current AI at least compared to another team member - the AI cannot have access to a lot of context due to data security rules.
I feel this also misses something rather big. I find there's a huge negative value of people I have to help through doing a task - I can usually just get it done at least 2x if not 5x or more faster and move on with life. At least with a good intern I can hope they'll learn and eventually actually be able to be assigned tasks and I can ignore those most of the time. Current AI can't learn that way for various reasons, some I think technical, some business model driven, whatever. It's like always having the first day on the job intern to "help".
The other problem is - unless I have 0 data security rules, there's just so much the AI cannot know. Like I thought today I'd have Claude 3.7 thinking write me a bash script. I wanted it to query a system group and make sure the members of that group are in the current users .k5login. (Now, part of this is me not knowing how to prompt, but it's also stuff a decent intern ought to be able to figure out.) One, it's done a lot of code to work out what the realm is - this is useful generically, but is just code that could contain bugs when we know the realm and there's only one it'll ever operate in.
I also had to re-prompt because I realized it misunderstood me the first time, whereas I think an intern would have access to the e-mail context so would have known what I meant.
Though I will say it's better than most scripters in that it actually does a lot of "safety" stuff we would find tedious and usually have to have something go wrong to add in, so ... swings and roundabouts? It did save me time, assuming we all think it's method is good enough - but this is also such a simple task that I think in some ways it's barely above filling out a lot of boilerplate. It's exactly the sort of thing I would have expected to see on stack overflow back in the day.
EDIT: I actually had a task that felt 100% AI could have done... if there was any way for it to know lots and lots of context. I had to basically fill out a long docx file with often AI like text describing local IT security standards, processes, responsibilities and delegations. Probably over 60% I had to "just make up" cause I didn't have the context - for higher ups to eventually massage into a final form. But I literally cannot even upload the confidential blank form, forget about have some magic way for AI to get a brain dump from me about the last 10ish years of spoken knowledge and restricted wiki pages. Anything it could have made up mostly would have "been done" by the time I made a functional prompt.
I don't think we solve this till we can run frontier models locally at prices less than a human salary, with integrations into everything a human in that position could access.
Why would Ukraine trust any security guarantee anyway after the history?
Personally I think most of these sorts of things should have a 3 year warranty - but very few offer that. If you can't handle the 1 year you need to plan on the reality in the US IMHO. This isn't a Valve thing, its a USA thing. So ranting against Valve feels a little disengenuous. AFAIK there's no competitior that's better. Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo would say the same thing.
So - in the future buy with a card that extends the warranty by a year or buy an extended offering from the company or square or whatever, if you can't self insure the 200 repair or 600 ish replacement costs.
I just wonder if we should take single source reporting ...
For home use (and small uses at work) I've found cyberpower to be cheaper than APC and yet work as well. You'd likely need to get a model with a network card option, and that'll cost more I think. I'm not in EU though, so IDK what model would meet your needs and price point (which seems pretty low to me for a network enabled UPS).
Strangely, that generally is how my Linux boxes have been - way less IT guy than when we had WinXP or Win7. You have to use a stable distro however - which TBH is the problem with Win10 and 11 for a lot of people - finding the "stable" version isn't available to home users or is complicated - so you have new OS deployments every 6 months. Windows Updates are now forced and still often have problems or bugs.
That all said, I think we've just got to get used to unstable / rolling release OSs cause "everyone" is doing it. Even Alma is not as stable as previous enterprise linux rebuilds due to Red Hat not releasing point release security updates anymore.
Vacuum sealing meat kind of requires plastic though. And that's by far the best way to keep the meat good / fresh especially for freezing.
Systems don't vote in the US however (at least in the context of this article) - we're talking about individuals voting.
In this case, I think using the term racist here is diluting the term and causing confusion. I think it's better to us the anthropological term here of tribal, at least in your first and last paragraphs. If everyone is racist then I have trouble not considering that a normal part of being human. It seems like railing against people who breath or something. If we're biologically programmed to be this way, then we need to stop trying to claim people are bad for their biology, and at best we're now going to say there's an acceptable and normal level of racism on the spectrum that everyone is on.
I don't think that's a great framing, and avoiding that framing in my mind means not claiming that everyone is racist.
I was assuming the people that are the potential P zombie here are the ones turned off from Trump because of open racism, and therefore NOT voting for him. I implied that these people are taking actions they (at least think) are not racist, like not voting for Trump.
If you made an argument, I could perhaps put some thought into it. My argument is simply that Russia isn't paying our taxes, and is a different country, so there's no comparison I can think of.
People living in an area paying taxes for that school have every right to be on the school board - it's a direct application of "no taxation without representation" in which kind of implied in the US is the right to run for the office and be elected to the office. We fought a revolution over taxes and representation. So, not - I put some thought into this and think I just won the debate right there.
Heh. I grew up rural, the school was the district. Thanks for the info.
Dells IME just suck. YMMV. Compared to the T480 it's more portable and lighter.
Where is the actual link for the article? Is it a video?
The Carbox X1 Gen7 is probably a decent choice, but it will depend on the specs - get at least an i5, and max out the RAM to 16GB - you can't add it later, so make sure to buy one with the 16GB.
To clarify here - do you think that people should be forced to leave school boards as soon as their kids graduate? Do they end up eligible again if their kids have grandkids? Is this limited to people with kids going to that specific school? Also, does paying school taxes not make you have some skin in the game?
And what about just input on the society you live in? It seems to me the solution in your example would be to have younger people run for / contest the school board.
Do you also buy the Vance line that people who don't have kids should not vote because they don't have skin in the game? At what age are you too old (or need to have kids by) to be concerned about the future? And regardless of "the future" at least some policy's are about right now. Like the abortion bans or getting rid of Medicare or social security, or raising taxes or regulation of sources of heat or stoves etc... These matter to people till they die ffs.
So I was recently in a Clark's outlet and at least the men's shoes seemed obviously a victim of shrinkflation, ie they felt a lot cheaper and lesser quality. Which makes sense as they're still doing 2 for 99 or I guess men's just went up to 109. But they were 50 dollars each at the outlets back in 05, so they simply have to be lesser quality now. And it's really obvious.
So what's a men's shoe that has the quality of older Clark's at maybe 100 a pair now? Anything or do I have to step up to like the Redwing Irish Setter at more like 200?
I mostly want kind of half and half leather boots/shoes. Comfortable. I guess if they also have women's options that would be interesting too for my mom and sister who had liked Clark's back in the day.
So I have a couple month old OnePlus N30 phone, and one thing that drives me crazy with it is when I plug it in at night to charge, eventually it fully charges. You would think this is good, but then it decides to vibrate every 30 seconds or minute or so to tell me it's fully charged. Over and over again till it wakes me up and I unplug it. So far it's still mostly charged by the next morning but this is ridiculous - aren't you supposed to charge the phone overnight?
I tried just turning off the notification but the phone is using the system UI to notify and won't let me turn it off.
Does anyone know how to stop this?
Ideally, there'd be a simple RPM installer compatible with Alma 9 that I can point to a samba share that holds all the photos, kind of like what I do with Jellyfin. Also nice if it uses an otherwise unused port or I can easily set what port it uses.
My googling is finding a bunch of docker stuff, which always seems needlessly complicated to me vs an RPM... I'm also using a low powered x86 tiny computer to front JellyFin and would like to host this on the same computer vs needing another server.
Any ideas?
I just saw that for Spring they're doing a new Spice and Wolf, but it looks like they're not continuing the story but re-making what already had a pretty good IMO anime with 2 seasons. IIRC That anime was also pretty close to the source material, so I can't really see what us watchers will get from a remake other than I guess maybe more modern animation? Which is also kind of a waste cause there's a lot more light novels to adapt IMO.
IDK if this is going to get any responses, but if you have any experience with using propane with a portable generator maybe you can explain what's going on.
So I got a big generator, I previously only used gas, but as this was new and dual fuel, it seemed like propane might be a big win. Propane as far as I know doesn't get old like ethanol gas does, won't gum up small engine carbs like gas does.
However, it had some downsides - the tanks are not able to just have an extra gas can to refill while the generator is running if needed, and for some reason I can't tell the manual gives 0 estimated runtime with propane, but lots for the gas fuel. Ok, well some searching found a Y connector with a kind of switch/indicator that is supposed to auto failover to the second connected tank if the first one empties so you can then change out the tank while the generator is running.
Now my problem. Power goes out last night, it's 20F and I fire up the new generator for the first time. First hour, no issue, however it then starts almost stalling out and then restarting over and over again. I go look at it seems like the "switch" indicated it tried to change tanks but... maybe didn't? It went straight up and down, not pointed to the other side (though IDK if I actually understand the switch, there were like 0 instructions with it from Amazon). OK, I'll just figure out which tank is empty (wondering how it went empty in like an hour on a 20lb tank) and move the switch to the other one and then change out the tank with my spare. Did all this, no change. Cannot get the generator to run right, and cause constant brownouts to my house and the generator makes a sound like it's backfiring every so often. I give up on backup power for the night.
Today, I go look at it again, and it starts up and runs fine today at 43F. However I haven't put a load on it, but it wasn't running right without a load last night, so I don't think it was overloading the generator (and I know it wouldn't given earlier uses when it was warmer). OK, well lets at least use the valves on the top of the 20lb tanks to test the switch over thing. I tried turning off one of the tanks (right), the one the switch / arrow is pointing towards. Nada, generator keeps running, switch doesn't do anything. I turn off left and generator stalls out. Weird. I then reset, restart, and try turning off the left tank - no change keeps running. I then re-open left and close right, no change, generator keeps running. Just to not lose my mind, I also close left and as expected generator stalls out.
Ok, so - do I have a worthless amazon transfer thingy, is the propane just not working at 20F or below? This seems really weird as I have a 500 gallon tank for my entire life for heat and stove and it got down to like -15F a few times with no issue.(I asked my provider, they say they can't hook up the portable generator, or even provide me a propane hose / valve/ anything I could hook it up to.) The 20lb tanks are brand new... So some googling seems to say maybe the tanks need to be warmer? I could get some tank heaters I guess and plug them into the generator also assuming it can run long enough for the heater to do anything and bootstrap stuff when it's cold. However, I'm also concerned about not having any estimate how long it should run from what should be 40lbs of propane. I don't know if the first tank leaked over the months since I set it up (the other 2 didn't), but 1 hour seems really fast to run out, and I would expect at least 8 hours when the gas tank is supposed to be good for 18.
So - do I just give up on propane for this generator? It seems silly to keep propane for the warm months and then switch to gas for the winter...
Harvard University president Claudine Gay was hit with six additional allegations of plagiarism on Monday in a complaint filed with the university, breathing fresh life into a scandal that has embroiled her nascent presidency and pushing the total number of allegations near 50. Seven of Gay’s 17 pub...
New AI-generated digital replicas of real experts expose an unnerving policy gray zone. Washington wants to fix it, but it’s not clear how.
cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/4070141
> So I've been using Kagi for a while now as a paid search engine. I always thought it's $25 a month plan was a little steep for search, but a) I got work to pay for it, and b) startpage nee google was getting less and less useful, and bing and whatever used it has... well been worse for me always. > > Anyway, I just got told that they've now adjusted their pricing / added features to Ultimate, and I think (at least now) that's actually added a lot of value if you're into the more advanced LLVM / AI models / chat. I have also been paying $20 a month through work for ChatGPT Plus. I might drop that because Kagi now lets you chat with / use GPT4 as well as Claude2 and a Google LLVM model with the one $25 a month, in addition to all the search and AI Search (with sourcing) together. > > I don't know how well paid search is going to ever do - it might be a short term tool. But for now, not having ads in the search, a straightforward pay for service model that seems to work just as well with their stated privacy goals, and getting multiple AI LLVM is pretty cool "one stop shopping" if you will. I also like giving a shot to alternate models that might be more privacy focused.
So I've been using Kagi for a while now as a paid search engine. I always thought it's $25 a month plan was a little steep for search, but a) I got work to pay for it, and b) startpage nee google was getting less and less useful, and bing and whatever used it has... well been worse for me always.
Anyway, I just got told that they've now adjusted their pricing / added features to Ultimate, and I think (at least now) that's actually added a lot of value if you're into the more advanced LLVM / AI models / chat. I have also been paying $20 a month through work for ChatGPT Plus. I might drop that because Kagi now lets you chat with / use GPT4 as well as Claude2 and a Google LLVM model with the one $25 a month, in addition to all the search and AI Search (with sourcing) together.
I don't know how well paid search is going to ever do - it might be a short term tool. But for now, not having ads in the search, a straightforward pay for service model that seems to work just as well with their stated privacy goals, and getting multiple AI LLVM is pretty cool "one stop shopping" if you will. I also like giving a shot to less ad based models for Internet services that I can't see how they don't become privacy invasions.
So, I have a VM DC that I had to restore from a month ago. I had other DCs that were physical and up. My understanding that if sub 60 days "off" it is fine to basically "power back on" the snapshot. However, now the "restored" DC has disabled replication in both directions. Should I manually enable inbound replication first and then after a while enable outbound replication?
Or a better fix method?
Starting in January, Americans will be required to obtain travel authorization to enter 30 European countries, including Spain, France and Greece.
Our investigation of the security incident disclosed by Microsoft and CISA and attributed to Chinese threat actor Storm-0558, found that this incident seems to have a broader scope than originally assumed. Organizations using Microsoft and Azure services should take steps to assess potential impact.
This really doesn't make me love cloud identity management. It's exactly the scenario (kind of nightmare one) where you attack the cloud infrastructure and get access to many different customers and apps... potentially in a way completely undetectable by you. At least with local identity providers they have to compromise you, and you might have logs.
Kind of finally. SuSE https://www.suse.com/news/SUSE-Preserves-Choice-in-Enterprise-Linux/
So... I think this is kind of the worst case scenario re SuSE - an actual fork. But Oracle kind of hints at that, and Amazon already dropped a RHEL compatible AWS Linux for sort of a Fedora Server?
Obviously none of this is great, but would anyone really want Oracle leading a RHEL "close as possible" rebuild? I don't know anyone is going to downstream them.
SuSE is even weirder, as I understand it, SLE/OpenSuSE is a fork from decades ago, or at least also uses RPM? I can't imagine they get any value from trying to make a RHEL fork really... Why not push SLE? All very confusing, that's for sure.
Maybe I'm an old person, but I feel like one of the weakest ideas for a show or movie is a remake. It's like, you can't find anything new to do? The reasons to do remakes I can see (outside of just money chasing):
-
It's been like 60 years and no one remembers. This is the weakest.
-
You do a interesting twist or change(The various Sherlock Holmes in modern day, redoing in a different language, doing a live action version).
-
The previous adaptation was completely off the rails and considered bad.
-
There were shots that you just couldn't do in the past due to less technology.
For the recent Trigun, and now Spice and Wolf and Rurouni Kenshin - were the previous anime's way off the source material? I don't think Spice and Wolf was, I haven't read the source for Trigun or Kenshin. If not, I'm struggling to see why anyone who was interested in these would wait to see the "new" version versus just watching the existing one RIGHT NOW.
For those of us who watched the existing version, why would we want to waste time on re-watching the same story when there's other shows that are new, either to everyone or at least to us? I guess in my limited time to watch a firehose of entertainment (heck, just in Anime, forget about shows like The Witcher, various Star Trek, books etc), tell me what I'm missing by just skipping these and remembering the stuff I watched 15-20 years ago?
Heck, I even tried to watch the live action movies of Kenshin, and while the first was interesting enough, I was also kind of just like, oh yea - this scene now. And never watched the rest because I know the story.
OTOH, I recall these being enjoyable enough that I watched Trigun and Kenshin several times, bought the translated light novels for Spice and Wolf (though I did peter out around book 11).
Portmaster is a free and open-source application that puts you back in charge over all your computer's network connections. Increase your privacy and security. Get peace of mind.
I looked at this, and the idea seems very interesting being tied into a per application "firewall" which I think actually works more like per application routing, or even better per domain. This would actually be a big convenience to send some traffic that doesn't like you being in one location to another vs a VPN. However, I can't actually see how it would be better than a VPN necessarily.
-
First - it seems like it could not really work for SSL without MITM it at the browser level? Or it at least has to be DNS based (and still the HTTPS based DNS would thwart this) and therefore not really per domain right?
-
Second, what are they charging for here? It sounds like it's access to TOR, though they claim it's only TOR Like, I fail to see why anyone would provide them an exit node or transit node for free when they're charging end users for access.
-
Presumably the reason people use VPNs rather than TOR is a mix of issues, but the main one I remember is performance. TOR is slow. I don't see how this would be faster. The privacy one is that you've got the exit node issue which is the same as the VPN exit node (i.e. there are side channels to get identity, and you're still having someone else seeing all exit info - in this case a random person rather than a company, we can decide which is more trustworthy, but I don't think it's an obvious win).
How do people here feel about mosh to the wide internet? We provide SSH, and use both normal secure passwords and duo for all logins. We've had a few more inquiries about using mosh recently, and looking at it, the big concerns I'd have are potentially the firewall rules (is it outgoing or incoming high port?) and the long lasting authentication across IPs and network connections. On unmanaged collaborator or partner devices this seems like a kind of hole if the device is compromised or stolen, where the session can live for "a long time".
However, I tend to believe them that their AES session keys make it pretty unlikely to be hijacked just over the net. Is there any consensus?
The naive answer is that white men and scientists are coldly rational—but that’s not the whole story
I'm part of the suspected demographic, but I also find much of this article lacking in advancing the thesis.
>It is true that many of us fear the unknown, but it is also true that we can be cavalier about routine risks.
This may be true, but why is it that white men would be more likely to have routine interactions with the risks of technology than any other group? At a population level, it seems likely that at least white women would be equally likely to have routine interactions with nuclear power or genetically modified foods, two of the examples in the article.
>Scientists also make a mistake when they assume that public concerns are wholly or even mostly about safety.
This may be true, but "risks" are usually understood as indicating some danger, otherwise I would strongly suggest using a different word. Perhaps negative preferences? IDK I didn't write the article.
>Pope Francis, for example, rejects genetic modification of organisms in part because he views it as an inappropriate interference in God's domain; this is a theological position that cannot be refuted by scientific data.
Ok, but then the "risk" is simply that one religion believes it offends their god. There's thousands of religions and atheists. At least some of them would reject this as any sort of "risk" because they simply don't believe it in - if we're talking on a global scale.
>Some people object to GM crops such as Roundup Ready corn and soy because they facilitate the increased use of pesticides.
But surely this isn't just because we don't like pesticides right? Presumably it's because there is some "risk" involved in health or environment or something. If this wasn't the case, at least in the US I'd be hard pressed to see how we would justify regulating what private companies and individuals decide to do with their own property if there aren't externalties. And if there are externatilites - this "argument" doesn't express what they are or why white men downplay those risks, or actually even show that they do. This is more "I disagree with some experts I read once". "Some people"... well, what people - and where are the hordes of white men claiming the opposite?
>Others have a problem with the social impacts that switching to GM organisms can have on traditional farming communities
Sounds vaguely like a protectionist argument to support more people starving if you want to be glib like this article is.
>or with the political implications of leaving a large share of the food supply in the hands of a few corporations.
This surely isn't an issue with the technology at all though - this is just a political argument, and plenty of white men don't like the corporatism in various places.
>Some concerns about geoengineering—not just among laypeople but among scientists as well—have more to do with regulation and oversight than with safety.
Again, politics and explicitly not about safety, so is this about "risk" of the technology, or far more about the huge risks in our problematic political and governmental systems? The argument seems to be white men (who they use interchangeably with scientists and experts - a pretty difficult to defend position IMHO) when asked about technology risks tend to look at the direct first order risks of the technology. This could very simply just be "how you ask the question" - ask about second order risks or the like and you might get a lot more about that - they do call scientists here agreeing with them.
>Who will decide whether this is a good way to deal with climate change?
Presumably the people doing it. Maybe governments, but I'm not so sure anymore. We've spent a very long time chasing "consensus" and doing about nothing. While a lot of that is people who weren't arguing in good faith - continuing to do nothing because we can't have a global vote doesn't seem prudent either. But no discussion of halting anything being a risk in itself. They never seem to weigh the obvious alternatives in this article.
>If we undertake the project of setting the global temperature by controlling how much sunlight reaches Earth's surface, who will be included in that “we,” and by what process will the “right” global temperature be chosen?
I think this is likely a pipe dream that we even could do this, but I would bet if you asked scientists and experts, or even white men as a whole, you might get the "pre modern" temperature that we're comparing all this climate change data against?