jimbolauski @ jimbolauski @lemm.ee

Posts

2

Comments

463

Joined

2 yr. ago

You're partially right, stationary objects on the side of the road will have a different Doppler shift than a stationary object in front of the vehicle, items on the side of the road can be filtered. Cheap radars with low sampling rates will not be able to distinguish as their Doppler bins are fairly large.

Radar would not detect a Styrofoam wall either the return from Styrofoam is extremely low. Radar also can not distinguish elevation differences very well so an overhead road sign can be mistaken for a stopped vehicle or a stopped vehicle mistaken for an overhead road sign.

What does what other people experienced have to do with me seeing changes in weather?

My point, which went so far over your head that you'd need a telescope to see it, was that I have to trust the experts. When those experts clear the rainforest to make a road from the city to their lair it erodes that trust.

You don’t remember?? You don’t fucking remember?

Why would I remember a typical winter. It got cold & snowed, how much it snowed or how cold it was I have no clue.

I’ve seen winters go from snowy to snowless.

Either you live in an area that historically doesn't get much snow or you're full of shit, I'm betting the latter. According to "the science", no area has seen that drastic of a temperature change to go from snowy to no snow.

You not remembering it as a reason to not believe in it that’s crazy. You have seen it.

Never claimed I don't believe just that I have not observed changes with my own eyes.

Normal people can remember last year’s weather.

I doubt you remember how many times it got below freezing this past winter.

Are you really going to sit here and deny global warming when you can literally see it with your own eyes these past 20 years?

Everyone says 2024 was one of the hottest, I didn't notice, spring didn't have many hot days and either did summer that I recall. I coach track in the spring and summer and take note of hot days. I don't remember the 23/24 winter and certainly don't remember the weather from the last 20 years. I have to "trust the science" for that kind of climate analysis. So no I have not seen it with my own eyes and unless you have been logging your own weather station for the last 20 years you have not either.

It's getting harder to believe that climate change is threat and not a grift when climate activist act this way.

If his claim is true he probably had an ankle or boot holster. Taking off his boot dislodged his gun and it fell to the ground discharging. I could not imagine the blisters from trying to walk around with a loose gun in my boot, a crease in my sock is above my threshold.

I'm more interested in who awarded that contract and what was the bidding process. If it was an open bid the winner had to know they were the only ones bidding.

The rant was in chem trails make frogs gay territory way before the Jews conspiracies.

Not that Id expect anyone to read the decision let alone understand the ruling but all that was rulled was that the EPA doesn't have the authority yo include end result requirements in permits. The EPA still has the authority to say San Francisco can't discharge poo into the Pacific Ocean or set allowable amounts of poo to be discharged. They can not hold San Francisco responsible for a TPM (turds per million) number for the Pacific Ocean.

• Forgot scan app with virus total
• Investigate if hits are false positives
• Get frustrated and run exe any way

Agree 100%. My guess is that removing software from a device you don't own without the owner's permission is illegal in Europe. I believe Microsoft got in trouble for removing 3rd party antivirus.

All about the Donnies is not bad.

It's not Google's search buisness that LaLiga is going after it's the cell phone side. LaLiga claims Google and Huawei benefited by refusing to disable the newplay app on their phones.

To get dumbasses like us to click on the page to read about a whole lot of nothing. I wonder how Netflix is going to spin this.

The majority doesn't approve of more LGBT characters either, it's just Newsweek being intentionally misleading.

In summary, 36 percent disapproved in some form, 34 percent approved, while 31 percent neither approved nor disapproved, or didn't know how they felt.

I'd venture the majority of people prefer a good story. When you shoehorn any elements into a story it distracts the audience. The Star Trek Beyond Lt Sulu scene is a good example it did not provide any character or story development. Many of the star wars shows have similar elements which hurt an all ready damaged story.

Belichick got too powerful and the league wants him to stay down a peg or two.

How thin skinned must teams and drivers be that booing is the thing they are most worried about.

The whole reason I'm conservative is because of my distrust of government. I can't understand why an Orwellian position of tracking pregnant women would be popular to anyone with conservative values. Even under the guise of protecting babies this is disgusting.

The rich energy livery was pretty good.