hypelightfly @ hypelightfly @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

31

Joined

2 yr. ago

Already answered. It's clear you were arguing in bad faith and refusing to give others the same curtesy you were provided.

https://lemmy.world/comment/2307147

See, that wasn't so hard and I actually agree with you too. Now why couldn't you have given the other user the curtesy of answering their question and having a discussion in good faith instead of ranting about their opinion without addressing anything they said?

Something someone else wrote.

Doubling down I see. It's an opinion and while I may not agree with whoever you think is the best president you can't really be wrong.

I'm just annoyed at people who rant about other peoples opinions but refuse to offer their own when asked. You aren't arguing in good faith here.

For the record I don't think FDR was the best president but I also disagree with some of your characterizations.

You were using an analogy where a bully threatens to beat you up and take your money.

No, I wasn't.

That's nothing like the current situation. The current situation is a nuclear armed nation is willing to wage an endless war and we're throwing money and bombs and tanks at the problem trying to make it go away.

No, it's not.

You're comparing small scale things to nuclear scale things and it's really just absurd.

No, I'm not.

Here's what I'm getting from their comments:

"US bad, Russia good. I love Putin and anything that I can pretend is a communist nation, despite not even being slightly close"

Bullies also don't have nuclear weapons.

Uh, yes. Yes they do.

It certainly can be.

All voting is a popularity contest, so I guess you don't like voting or democracy?

They asked for a specific example and you failed to provide one. You had 45 choices and couldn't even pick one?

I don't mind them existing either. My issue is with how they show up in the subscription feed now. I'd prefer separate feeds for shorts.

Broadcast not cable, and owned by Disney.

For this specific case, yes to the first question, no to the second question.

Admin refusing to do anything about a kid with a gun after being told a kid has a gun isn't a funding problem.

They did the opposite and shoved a pointless shorts section in the middle of your subscription page so you can't see what you actually want to look at.

I do and it's already available at https://old.lemmy.world for anyone who prefers it.

Someone else mentioned old.lemmy.world if you like the old reddit UI. That one is closer to what I want personally.

But yeah, options is great. Just need a way to save a preference now so it will use my preferred UI when logged in. Either that or throw together a redirect plugin.

Unfortunately this is even worse than the default lemmy UI with even more wasted space on desktop. But hey, more options for people is always nice and hopefully some will like this.

I read the article, it's also shit and fails to properly talk about the issue instead of ranting about data loss.

Did you read the article? Because as far as I can see it fails to actually say shit about the problem. From just this article I can see why people are blaming the author for not having redundancy.

The Arstechnica articles however do actually say what's going on, so yeah this appears to be a real issue with these drives disconnecting.

You have it backwards. Defederation happened prior to the removal of the "child-like" reference. Per the explanation of the removal it was part of the community from the start when the definition of adorable was copy/pasted.

I don't know why you would assume the addition happened after defederation based on the time stamp of it's removal.