@selzero @raccoona_nongrata @fwygon I try not to consume it as art. There is plenty of original art by real artists. The averages of that dataset are less interesting to me than the original data points.
@selzero @raccoona_nongrata @fwygon I don't think it's even contraversial. Will sentient machines ever have an equivalent experience? Very probably. Will they be capable of creating art? Absolutely.
Can our current statistical bulk reincorporation tools make any creative leap? Absolutely not. They are only capable of plagiarism. Will they become legitimate artistic tools? Perhaps, when the people around them start taking artists seriously instead of treating them with distain.
@selzero @raccoona_nongrata @fwygon But human creativity is not ONLY a combination of past creativity. It is filtered through a lifetime of subjective experience and combined knowledge. Two human artists schooled on the same art history can still produce radically different art. Humans are capable of going beyond has been done before.
Before going too deep on AI creation spend some time learning about being human. After that, if you still find statistical averages interesting, go back to AI.
![glenatron](https://cdn.masto.host/dicecamp/accounts/avatars/108/194/058/813/665/624/original/f6a589f13c23f8b4.png?format=webp&thumbnail=64)
GM for Crudely Drawn Swords ( https://soundcloud.com/crudely-drawn-swords ), occasional game designer ( https://bridlewise.itch.io/ ) sometimes musician ( https://crudely-formed-chords.bandcamp.com/ ) and all-around dork who cares too much about horses and shows excessive dedication to puns.
Currently working on Trilogy, a PbtA game for telling epic fantasy stories in worlds of your own creation.