Eisenhower had a decorated military history, excellent for commander in chief. As did Grant.
That wasn't the question.
But Michelle Obama has basically no relevant qualifications.
What qualifications should be relevant? And why does close confidant and advisor to a president for 8 years not count in your mind?
Eisenhower would like a word. As would Hoover, Grant and the orange man.
has absolutely zero qualifications
This is completely false.
As some have touched on, this also means that the MAGA crowd will believe that by extension they are also entitled to immunity and will act accordingly.
I have news. This "rapid technological change" thing? It's window dressing. At the end of the day it's how humans relate to and interact with technology that matters, and humans haven't changed. The core principles, that you develop a deeper understanding of with experience, really haven't changed appreciably.
I see orange man knows his Goebbels well.
People have families that also need to eat.
Yes. So why TF are they buying from Burger King? That's not food.
And $30 at any fast food place these days does not feed a family.
You don't disagree with Kling enough to object. This is clearly demonstrated here.
Edit: Let me a little more clear. Kling is the one bringing politics into it. The change was simple (one word!) and technically correct. It would be like if I said "I want our new logo to be red" and you said "don't bring politics into it" when really I just like tomatoes and sunsets.
people can have different views. you might not like them but it’s their views, not yours
Yes, they can. And I can also view their views with disdain... or even horror and choose not to support their efforts, whatever they may be.
What you are really saying here is that you to some degree don't disagree with Kling and so it's this particular view you find acceptable to let pass. If it were something like "people should be fine eating small children" you might react differently.
Can you provide some context?
This Mastodon post discusses it and has links to the PRs: https://ruby.social/@denis/112718132053579597
This one for SerenityOS shows Kling's response to a very minor and neutral change.
He’s only unpopular because of bots, trolls, and the likes of fox “news”.
And a years-long campaign by Republicans to tap into people's prejudices against old people. Never mind they'd struggle to name one actual policy position they'd disagree and haven't bothered to learn of all the things they'd wholeheartedly support if they were just aware of them.
The leftist fifth columnist menace is the single greatest threat to American freedom and liberty.
Sure grandpa, sure. Let's get you to bed!
Not to quibble but technically dispersed camping, according to the USFS, is camping anywhere outside designated sites. The distinction is important because people believe they can't camp on USFS (or BLM) land for free, almost anywhere they want. In fact with relatively few exceptions and with a bunch of rules like time limits, proximity to water sources, fire restrictions etc etc, you can.
Also your conclusion was obvious
Can you define in real terms the practical difference between 45% Dem vs 50% Dem ?
You going to appreciate the high quality source you received and change your point of view?
What is my view again?
Here you go. You have newer data than April?
Nope, I'm gonna thank you for providing more recent data which shows something interesting - Boomers as a generation grew more Dem leaning until relatively recently. So obviously I need to correct my assertion that boomers lean liberal, which clearly is no longer the case.
But... and I'm sure you knew I'd have a but... One of the things people here do is issue the blanket "boomer bad" declaration as if ALL Boomers are conservative. Clearly, your data shows about a 45% Dem to 50% Republican split. To me this is an incredibly important point.