Skip Navigation
*Permanently Deleted*
  • Block, block, block. You have to beat Youtube with a hammer to steer the algorithm, but it'll catch on eventually. And one thing to avoid is hate-watching. Youtube doesn't care if you're only watching it because you hate it, it just cares that you're watching it.

    And right-wingers get into Star Trek for similar reasons to liberals--because it's entertaining, and it reflects their values. Only, they don't see the space communism, the egalitarian society, the infinite diversity in infinite combinations. They see the mighty starships roaming a war-ridden galaxy, essentially stand-ins for American Navy vessels (as every "Constitution" class ship makes clear in its name). They see simple morality plays where a majority-white-male crew consistently demonstrates the superiority of their wits and values over other races, while also hooking up with alien women. It's a myopic view of the franchise, but it can certainly describe a lot of the original series, a fair amount of nineties trek, and the whole Abrams trilogy, too.

  • Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Strange New Worlds | 2x05 "Charades"
  • The Temporal Cold War has made ripples in the timeline. The Romulan time traveler in "Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow" strongly hinted that history was at least a little bit different than it had been, with the date of the Eugenics War as case in point. I think the writers are freeing themselves up to make minor changes to canon. I don't think it's a branching timeline, though, it's still Prime. Just a little bit different, like Gabriel Bell being replaced by Captain Sisco.

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)EF
    effinstephen @startrek.website
    Posts 0
    Comments 3