Skip Navigation
Pity, really.
  • @AVincentInSpace
    It's a part of blame shifting. Restaurants dying? It's the millenials eating at home, not the geedflation.
    Home prices are through the roof? It's the milenials fault for eating avocado toast, not the lack of public housing and development & renting oligopolies.
    Millenials killed industry X? Milenials didn't buy into the hype, not because they don't have money or the industry wasn't profitable.

    So instead blame shifting kill the boomer in your head.

    @Kit

  • A few newbie questions about the google play store, and rooting my phone
  • @AphoticDev
    -> (@GrapheneOS offers a good way out of this, but it's only for Google hardware, which is in the race to the bottom with stripping hardware features.)

    @moosetwin

  • A few newbie questions about the google play store, and rooting my phone
  • @AphoticDev
    Unless Google opens it up in revenge, then no, not totally unprotected. But they did set the rooting path to expand the attack surface needlessly.
    It's a consequence of locking up your device, so you can't control it to serve as a vehicle for ads, DRM, and data mining.

    Security 3rd, otherwise there would be no problems with patching.

    F.e. https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/google-android-patch-gap-makes-n-days-as-dangerous-as-zero-days/

    Still one needs to be VERY aware what consequences rooting has.

    ->
    @moosetwin

  • preach
  • @BraBraBra
    Yes, you are. Especially that you've just left a specific context of copying a given video or given medical product for a very broad context of “Amazon doesn't a monopoly on making videos”, that can't be denied, and skipping the medical part.

    That's Motte-and-bailey fallacy:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy

    So if Amazon has the right to exclusively sell you video then pharma can sell you exclusively gouge you for lifesaving drugs.

    Don't get diabetes in 'murica if you have the chance.

  • preach
  • @BraBraBra
    No they didn't. Amazon still offers the copied product. They only remove it when it's inconvenient to pay residuals.

    But if you argue for intellectual “property” exclusivity, then you argue for monopoles, inhibition of innovation (try making something like Google's project Ara) and protect life-threatening practices of the pharma industry (why you can't start making insulin in the USA or make a covid vaccine in the Global South?).

    @stappern

  • What do you use to actually manage your stuff?
  • @Gormadt
    Sergeant Murphys Laws of Combat Operations, 6: If it’s stupid but it works, it isn’t stupid.

    @RandomLegend

  • dzwiedziu Dźwiedziu @mastodon.social

    I know how the Internet does not work.

    Good morning, I have become agrnnoyed.

    Rebuilding my account after @dzwiedziu demise.

    90% toots in Polish

    Posts 0
    Comments 6