Is that what Lemmy wants to be?
Dark Arc @ Dark_Arc @social.packetloss.gg Posts 78Comments 2,258Joined 2 yr. ago

Thanks for finding it; I couldn't on my mobile app.
Also if that's the reason it was "bad faith", I think a far more appropriate action is to just say "they're actively settling the land they claim they don't want anyways" ideally with a citation as a comment.
That sentence was a fraction of what I'd said anyways. To remove the whole comment due to an objection to one sentence is ridiculous.
Maybe; can't say I've ever participated in those or know anything about them.
In any case, I've been having political arguments on social media since at least 2015 ... and I'm not convinced it was a good expenditure of time.
I think there are more reliable places to find news and it's best discussed with friends and possibly family. Social media is better for hobbies, interests, fun facts, history, and silly things.
I mean, even this fairly tame discussion we're having getting down voted speaks volumes really. I share your frustration but I'd invest your energy elsewhere.
Eh, maybe, but that's quite the claim.
I don't think forums really are a great place to have these political discussions at this point. I don't know how to make a news community that isn't going to outrage some group of people and become a moderation nightmare of its own given current political division.
(Edit: more likely they're well meaning moderators trying to prevent disinformation with their own political tilt on the facts, one which I, and I believe yourself, do not think is an accurate tilt given the rhetoric and behavior of Hamas)
Also just with regard to moderating controversial stuff, there are some shitty people out there ... The Lemmy development chat got bombarded with child porn. The KDE community got bombarded with gore. I'm still trying to get both of the respective images I saw out of my mind.
Honestly, between the technical issues as the base of lemmy, the leftist tilt, the honestly traumatizing imagery I've seen, etc, I'm increasingly considering packing up and moving to blue sky once it gets communities/discussion groups. The fedi-safe stuff has helped a lot, but I'm still in awe that there aren't more protections in place for lemmy (or matrix public chats).
The Lemmy.world News community moderation is awful; particularly when it comes to anything regarding Israel.
If I recall correctly I literally had a comment taken down for just explaining the perspective expressed (at the time recently) by an Israeli official. I believe the moderation note was that I was not making a "good faith" argument.
I would go so far as to say being anything but anti-Israel is not permitted in that community. I don't interact over there anymore.
I'm curious if this improves anything gaming wise as well; with better frame sync and all?
Does anyone have a good enough grasp on this to know if that's at all relevant?
On the negativity point; you get what you pay for.
There IS definitely negative stuff punished by the NYTimes and The Atlantic (as examples) but there's also quite a bit of neutral and even positive news.
These are all from the last few days:
Gaza Cease-Fire Talks Resume, but Are Overshadowed by U.S. Election https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/28/world/middleeast/gaza-cease-fire-us-elections.html?smid=nytcore-android-share
The Rebellious Scientist Who Made Kamala Harris https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/28/science/shyamala-gopalan-kamala-harris-mother.html?smid=nytcore-android-share
If You Think You Can Hold a Grudge, Consider the Crow https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/28/science/crows-grudges-revenge.html?smid=nytcore-android-share
New Covid Tests Are Here. They Test for Flu, Too. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/25/well/covid-flu-combination-tests.html?smid=nytcore-android-share
Ford Foundation Gives $10 Million to Studio Museum in Harlem https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/28/arts/studio-museum-in-harlem.html?smid=nytcore-android-share
https://www.nytimes.com/card/2024/10/28/arts/phil-lesh-fans?smid=url-share
Five Science Fiction Movies to Stream Now https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/25/movies/best-science-fiction-movies-streaming.html?smid=nytcore-android-share
Watches That Look Similar in Everything but the Price Tag https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/27/style/patek-philippe-cubitus.html?smid=nytcore-android-share
Just When You Thought Sneakers Couldn’t Get Any Weirder https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/26/style/erl-vamps-skate-shoe.html?smid=nytcore-android-share
Obviously, there are more that are negative, but negative stories are often the most important so that we know what problems still need attention.
Some Linux bad Windows good troll
There is a difference there in that these are digital copies (easy to make more copies) vs physical books (hard to make more copies).
That said, the only reason this is an issue is copyright lasts too long on relatively short lived games. If copyright on games was a more reasonable "15 years since their last major revision", this wouldn't be a problem.
The problem is you're effectively leaving "can I program and work through the kinds of tasks this job entails" and entering "how do you work through a complex theoretical research topic" land.
White board questions should be relative softballs related to the work you're actually doing to see how you think... Now that's often forgon for "welcome to a game of algorithm and data structure trivia!" but this is just a much more extreme version of that.
Also if you don't actually know the answer, how can you judge the direction? Even if you do know the answer for a problem that complicated, can you say the interviewee isn't solving the problem in a novel and possibly better way?
I presume he was looking for specific terms like DAWG (directed acyclic word graph) and things like that as well... Which I know because he would teach me the names of things as I slowly rediscovered them in conversation. Personally, I don't put much stock in grading someone on their knowledge of obscure data structures and algorithms either.
I think you should pick up a civics book and/or lookup what a monarch is.
I think the interview I least enjoyed was with an unnamed big tech company.
It was the first interview of the day and the guy came in with "so me and my buddy have been trying to solve this algorithm problem for years. I'd like you to try and solve it for me."
Like... Dude, that's not a reasonable interview question! You should not use algorithm questions that you don't know of any answer to in an interview. You're effectively asking someone to give you a solution to something way too complicated of a problem without even a few hours to think about the problem or sit down with it on their own.
I defederated my instance outright. I got fed up after (yet another) smug person from .ml, this time insisting "the only way to respect Palestinians in the upcoming election is to not vote for either candidate."
I'm losing patience for smug people in general.
If anyone who pays for the post or trusts its writing, isn't already voting Kamala and would've been swayed by their endorsement, I'll be shocked.
No, we're really not...
Permanently Deleted
tldr more bull shit from Kennedy trying to prop up Trump and presumably make Trump's threats against his opponents more "... well both sides" nonsense.
Permanently Deleted
Didn't look but I'd bet the details are in their post or comment history.
Re: harder to change, your electoral logic is already self-defeatjng. What do you think you are changing when your electoral logic is, "fall in line vite blue no matter who" including fucking genocide. Who would ever take you seriously? You think they're going to do anything to "win your vote"? Genocide apologist, they know they already have it. You announced you were giving it to them free of charge, that you will tolerate anything they do and still vote for them, and are actually pressuring others to do the same on their behalf.
The correct time to express such thoughts is during a primary. We didn't have one because we had an incumbent; it happens.
The better place to have this fight is through congress anyways. They're the ones that actually approve the aid.
Better yet, go talk to the Israel people and get them to vote for someone that stops using our weapons in such an offensive manor. Israel knows that their position is critical to the US interest and their current leaders are happy to exploit that.
Literally, abstaining makes you part of the "party of not voting" and nobody does anything for them, because they don't vote.
We are literally in a battle for our ability to vote.
Abstaining from said battle is effectively saying "I don't care" and letting Trump do what he will. If he chooses to send nukes to Palestine to end the conflict immediately, that's on everyone that abstained. If he ends aid to Ukraine and those people die, that's on everyone that abstained.
If he ends voting, you "won some moral battle" but you've all but permanently lost the war against genocide as the most powerful military and weapons on the planet are now in the hands of an authoritarian, raciest, fascist, regime that previously imposed a "Muslim ban" and I'm sure would happily do so again.
There is no hypocrisy here, and it's disingenuous to imply there is.
If you want to protest genocide, then GO DO IT, don't throw away a vote because that's not a protest, it's a pathetic excuse.
We're all only human and it's a hot button issue that's divisive even within the left leaning US political spectrum. Still, I suspect you can appreciate how frustrating it is from my perspective and why it has sat with me rather unfondly.
The Lemmy attitude has been staunchly anti-Israel (and at times frighteningly pro-Hamas) across the platform and having moderators remove a "mild mannered" comment, not in support of Israel, but in defense of situational nuance... It just further reinforces that narrative.
As I recall that day, several people I was engaging with were being much more uncivil and fervent than I was; Lemmy's moderation weirdness likely doesn't help as I'm not sure cross-instance reports really do much.