Skip Navigation
well...f*k.
  • im ok with it, try it at the very least. i have been just trying to keep up new posts to the community a bit is all with the image posts (mostly because they are creators i follow and they typically their newer stuff). the worst that could happen is down votes.

    to add to this, even though i did not look at every one, the subreddit had stories on there and i liked the variety

  • Proposed rules update, 8 July 2023
  • according to these rules, its on a case by case bases that would be up to the mods/admins of what they feel about the piece and its context. if any of them dont feel comfortable with it for looking too young, will be removed. atleast that is how i read it.

    e.g. the rebecca/midna shortstack argument that is brought up in these comments

  • Proposed rules update, 8 July 2023
  • TBF, the current rules were made in haste and have only been around a short time to mitigate things getting out of hand, so people could think with clear heads instead of putting out fires. also mods are kind of on a churn since we are still dealing with a user base that sees the new shiny and wants to do something with it before moving on (for various reasons, nothing against those people). so there are the occasional community that has a mod that has not done any posting or commenting in 20 days and active mods are trying to figure stuff out with limited tooling.

    not to mention that the new rules go some way to helping with that, leaving the mods/admins to interpret the context of the piece and its surrounding media to determine and if any one of them feels it should be removed, it will be. i also agree with @kellySunshine in this message thread

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BU
    buttercream @lemmynsfw.com
    Posts 18
    Comments 16