bouh @ bouh @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

1,677

Joined

3 yr. ago

I don't know about knives, but in fencing sword, the first target is the hand and arm, not the belly. The hand is as close to you though for any size of your opponent.

A tall opponent has a longer reach, so that is what you need to be wary of in fencing. It means it does have a advantage to attack. But once the blades crossed, the advantage is gone, and the you have the advantage bellow your taller opponent. Because you have more room for movement in the two blades space than your opponent. You are committed there though, because getting away from the situation will be harder.

A French youtuber did a study on porn, to see if it was violent as lawmakers make it seem. And as a matter of facts, the titles and tags rarely represent what it actually is.

My guess step mom is a side category to milf.

Of those things, only one will reliably work though.

The fun thing is that those supposed cross platform framework also require a full team for each platform.

That's such bullshit! Those supposedly cross platform shit are the least compatible softwares you can make! What can of idiot can pretend it's used because of Linux?

The fact he is old is actually more dangerous to US democracy than if there was decades ahead of him.

When time passes, a dictator is caught up by politics, and his power decrease because other factions will have consolidated their power so an equilibrium that satisfies all factions is necessary, and is thus more complex than a dictatorship.

If it's too soon after the start of the dictatorship, then the chaos still reign, and power still fall in the hand of the one who controls armed forces. Which is usually the last dictator alive after the succession war.

Everything goes down to what your army will be loyal to.

Social networks like lemmy or reddit have now replaced the forums in my experience, for the better or the worse.

Why is Israel word between quotes?

Développe : les deux ça veut dire quoi ?

Parce que là, tu prônes exactement ce que je critique. Avec ces critiques, les entreprises ont le monopole de ces outils, et les lignes sont tracées sur des questions symboliques complètement inutiles, voir rétrogrades ou qui les arranges.

Parce que les questions de pudibonderie, on fait pas beaucoup plus conservateur et en général ce sont les religieux, conservateurs ou fachos qui défendent ces idées. Qu'est-ce qu'on gagne à tracer la limite à l'usage romantique des IA ? Absolument rien. Les emplois remplaçables seront quand même remplacé, et c'est toujours derrière un carcan de brevets et de droits d'auteurs que vous allez même maintenant défendre. Qu'est-ce qu'on gagne a bannir ou limiter la pornographie ? Absolument rien. Les femmes du milieu sont toujours exploitées et le business tourne toujours autant.

Je parle pas de grand soir. Je parle de ce qu'on peut obtenir maintenant : des outils puissant qui vont redéfinir le travail. À la place vous prônez de laisser ce rôle aux entreprises, mais attention, on touche pas au sexe.

Si le problème c'est l'entreprise qui collecte les données, pourquoi les attaques ciblent-elles les IA plutôt que les entreprises ?

Quand au risques fasciste, est-ce que c'est pas un peu hors-sujet quand l'UE passé une loi pour surveiller les conversations chiffrées ?

Je vois tellement de problèmes dans tous ces combats contre les IA ça le désole. Comme si on devait se battre pour des miettes de libertés après avoir accepté de perdre la plupart d'entre elles, et souvent dans une optique très pessimiste.

La c'est typiquement un combat du même accabi que celui contre le porno. C'est de la pudibonderie. Défendre les droits d'auteur des artistes contre les IA, c'est défendre les droits d'auteur qui sont un des pires carcans capitaliste de notre société. Défendre le travail des gens face aux IA, c'est défendre le pseudo-esclavagisme auquel on est réduit.

Et si on se battait pour un meilleur plutôt ? Un monde dans lequel les IA et toutes les technologies n'appartiennent pas aux entreprises mais servent la société à la place, pour améliorer nos vies, nous libérer du travail, ou nous aider à faire face aux défis du XXIeme siècle. Ou on abandonne tout espoir face au capitalisme ?

I guess you're talking about 2024 rules? Because old 5e rules are different and don't have this flaw.

I didn't have problem updating debian stable to a next version. I got problems when I jumped 2 stables at once. Which was to be expected.

It does not reduces maintenance. And it costs hard drive, and with heavy use, probably ram too

Redundancy of dependencies in different versions, might also be loaded in ram in different version, which can add its own kind of problems in some circumstances.

Maintenance is only reduced on the surface level. The complexity you don't see as a problem is the actual maintenance problem. It's not a problem only if you're not the one dealing with integration, maintenance or security.

Piling abstraction layers is bad design imo. For performances, complexity and maintenance.

My opinion on flatpak is that it only allows developers to be loosy with dependencies. I'm convinced it will fall appart in a decade or two because it's too messy and bloated as a technical solution.

There are a lot of things an average consumer don't wa't to deal with, but that's true for windows as much as Linux. The question is not what they want to do, but what they need to do and if it seems difficult.

A command line can also be distributed as a bash script btw. The difference with an obscure executable that will edit the registry on windows it that the bash file can be checked much more easily.

I have a brother who is not into computers. But he has a shitty laptop (with only 3gb of ram) so windows stopped working on it (because Windows update). So I installed a Linux on it, and he is very happy with it.

He even managed to change the desktop by himself. Installing some stuff was not obvious (like making a scanner work), but I did it guiding him by phone and text.

Command line is in fact much easier in this case than any gui. In a gui, you must know it by heart to correctly guide the person. A command line you can fine tune it on your side, send it on discord, and he only has to copy/paste. That is much more powerful.

And the security is not less than downloading an executable on a dubious website.

It is true that specialist tend to overestimate the skill of unknowing people. But when it come to computer, people also forget that normal people always went for the help of specialist for their technical needs. Nothing changed.

I was in agreement until you talk about flatpak...

Except that's entirely false. Even now they are pretending they do nothing, it's the intermediaries who force things.

Mastercard sells absolutely nothing. And they have no responsibility for anything sold. And no one ever thought it was mastercard selling or even allowing to sell illegal things.

In fact, most people will believe no one sound of mind will buy something illegal with a credit card because mastercard and the likes will give your identity to the police.

So it's not about illegal things, and it's not about their image.

It's much worse than that. How they word it is "if it may damage the public image of mastercard". And they don't review the content, they review the means used to prevent the damage to their brand.

So valve doesn't even need to have anything that actually damage mastercard brand, it just need to be that mastercard is not comfortable enough with the measures used to prevent it.