Etwa sowas: https://www.marcophono.com/Gott.html? Klingt genau danach, hab ich auch schon erlebt. Gibt auf der Seite auch etliche andere "Anrufer", wie seriös das ganze ist weiß ich auch nicht, würde da definitiv niemals eine Telefonnummer angeben...
I thought about something like that as well, but never tried it out (yet). Do you use WireGuard tunnels for that? Or something else?
Ideally I'd not expose most of the services to the public internet at all, since only me and some relatives need access to most of them. I have briefly looked into Tailscale or similar services for that, but again, haven't tried that out yet, as that would (presumably) require changing quite a few things on both the server(s) and all of the clients...
After all, I'm just cosplaying as a sysadmin for the most part, so what do I know ;)
I do use one domain with several subdomains (or simply a wildcard), that's what I meant by the CNAME record(s). But I see that wasn't completely clear from the post.
The setup time is not really a factor, more just the overhead of one tunnel and one Traefik instance vs multiple tunnels without Traefik. I might just do some basic "benchmarking" if you can call it that to see the CPU and (more realistically) memory impact.
Hey everyone, just a quick question.
I've been selfhosting a number different web applications throughout the years. For most of them I would use Cloudflare Tunnels to expose them to the internet. I usually had one tunnel set up for my root domain and either a wildcard or multiple specific CNAME records pointing to the same tunnel. The tunnel would then terminate in a Docker container which shares a network with a Traefik instance, which then routes the traffic through a seperate network to the different application containers.
I was just wondering what your opinions on this are, considering this approach over a seperate tunnel for every application. This would eliminate the need for a shared network for Traefik, although I don't consider this much of an issue.
Any opinion, input or recommendation is welcome! I'd love to hear about your setups, if you're running something similar.
Look into AMDs Ryzen 5800X3D and RX 6800XT. Both last-gen but good gaming performance and value.
You say you've tried longer durations, but you're only sleeping for microseconds here... I'd assume you're simply playing the sound 30 times in 30 microseconds and as such only hear the last iteration. If you want the whole file to play every time, you could replace play_raw with play_once and use the returned Sink to simply sleep_until_end() instead of your own delay.
Edit: I just saw that you wrote that the clip played once and then quit, that doesn't make a lot of sense (with that sleep duration, it should quit pretty much immediately). It's been a while since I played around with Rodio and things seem to have changed a little. From quickly looking into it, I'd probably only call your play_sound function once and edit it to create a Sink in there (see the example in the documentation). You can then append an infinitely repeating source to that sink and sleep for you total desired duration.
I've been using a Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i (or Slim Pro 9i if you're in the US) for around half a year now and have been loving it so far. 14" MiniLED screen, 100% DCI-P3, can get really bright, has a touch screen (if that's something you like) and a 165 Hz refresh rate. Can't speak for the color accuracy though.
I got the i9 variant with 32GB RAM and an RTX 4060 GPU during a "Mega Power" sale and with an additional 10% off as a Student for just over 2000€, but even the normal price is "only" (compared to your MacBooks and XPSs) around 2500€ iirc.
RAM is sadly soldered onto the motherboard but at least you get 6400MHz for it. Storage is upgradeable.
Connectivity is great (2x USB-C with PD3.1 for 140W charging, one also supporting Thunderbolt 4, HDMI, full-size SD Card reader, 2x USB-A...)