Because men sometimes take it personally when they "can't make you cum." Occasionally they get mad and blame you. It's safer to just hide it and figure it out later if necessary.
Arch is absolutely divine with its documentation. There is a bit of a "you must be this tall to ride" with them though. Like the tiny [AUR] link. That's not really well explained, and is even more opaque if you follow the link.
Double snark if you get upset that I didn't accept it and reach out to find out why.
Sending my work email a calendar invite as the first communication. Just because you want to sell it doesn't mean I want to buy it. Or even hear about it. If a calendar event is the first thing you send me, I will be the avatar of snark. My calendar is busy enough without you inserting yourself into it without my consent.
Their home/home office stuff is absolutely trash. That much is true.
Much of their small business stuff is on the verge of being ok. Just, expensive for what it is.
Meanwhile at work we have hp enterprise printers that are twelve years old and still working flawlessly.
Because Fedora is open source only to the point of it being pathological. If there isn't am open source driver most time you're just boned. Someone new is going to have a tough time with it, and the community is on average a very "lol rtfm" bunch. Not as bad as Arch, but that's not saying much.
Meanwhile, despite the problems around Ubuntu, Debian communities are much more understanding and helpful. Mint even with old packages is going to be an easier time for a newbie. Certainly a newbie unfamiliar with the way entirely too much of the FOSS community is.
It depends on how they're delivered. Generally bullets are interpreted as a threat.
I specifically asked for five pictures of girls with one tit. No wonder the usage is so high!
Wet wipes are helpful if you'd rather not.
Sounds like something that someone with a head injury might say...
Twenty-nine gigs?!? My brother in christ, that's barely even a Thursday. Are you ok? Do you need a VPN?
I've seen reviews all saying things every which way. Please don't take it personally when no one trusts your pet review.
That's correct, but dogs don't naturally eat a "vegan" diet, and there is evidence all over the place as to whether or not that's good or safe for them. I would tend to be ok with housing a dog, but not with what is essentially still an experimental diet.
I'm pretty sure that the entire scientific community would agree that dogs can't consent to a vegan diet. We don't force humans without consent, why would you force a dog to do that?