Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BE
Posts
1
Comments
215
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Bigots, often. No offence to the person you are replying to (they said they default partner = same sex) but really it's mostly just people who refuse to broaden their worldview or accept neutral descriptive terms. Partner could mean any number of things and to assume it's just a same sex couple is ignorant.

  • Perhaps maybe we shouldn't work towards a system of rugged individuality and isolation. Perhaps capitalism has failed us by coercing us to believe living alone is an ideal worth chasing.

    I won't pretend life is good for many, but perhaps living alone shouldn't be the metric for success

  • Uhh, going to need to see some evidence of that. Literally never heard of non indie devs getting royalties or continued payments based off the success of the game.

    Actually I'll correct myself, rockstar is the only company I've heard of that does big internal payouts post launch. Most of Rockstars game launches have resulted in new houses for some of their teams.

    Got any other examples to share?

  • For 40 days democrats did all they could, they refused to compromise. Today they broke that status quo. When you don't have the votes and you don't have the message, you have nothing. Dems have failed for 50 years to do what Republicans have of infiltrating all levels of government such as mayors, governors, and judges.

    There really isn't much left for Dems to do except yell loudly, write loudly, or refuse to participate in the process. They've failed to get themselves in any strategic position to do anything else.

    We should all be mad and upset at them. Theyve failed to play the same game that the Republicans have won at. But short of physical altercations there is very little else Democrats can do

  • It's great that we can individually curate our feeds but what I think the person you replied to is highlighting is that the first impressions a new user may get is repetitive doomer content. That's the nature of sorting by all and our instance-based approach, but it's definitely an experience which may put new people off

  • I'm not the op but Ill take a stab at their ask because I want something like this too.

    The idea is to have a list of tasks which autopopulate based on their time since last completed. Those tasks do not have a schedule due date on them, but a recurrence interval. When the task is marked as complete the system will hide that task until the designated time has elapsed.

    This means that when opening the app, you only see tasks that are "overdue" based on their interval coming back up. If I don't complete the task today, it's still there tomorrow. If I complete the task, it should not reappear until the interval is up, and that interval should not be dependent on the day the task was completed.

    Example task; water plants every 7 days. I want the app to tell me exactly 7 days after I last completed the task that it's time to water the plants, regardless of whether it took me 3 days to complete the task.

    Would love to know if this exists already.

  • Most lefties with this viewpoint will eventually and begrudgingly agree that they'd vote for Newsome but of course spend the rest of their efforts sabre rattling against him while offering no one who meets their requirements.. shrug

  • Maybe this puts us at a disadvantage but giving up our principles for a common goal is not really how this works.

    I struggle to square the statement in the scope of "democracy". It reads like you don't want to compromise to reach a solution at all. That's not democracy. There will always be people who hold positions different to yours and one side is going to have to bend their principals to reach a compromise.

    I'm not asking you to accept any particular position here, but if we take a step back from the actual policies of our current time it sounds less like you want a democracy, a system where different views are blended together, and more like a system that only meets "your" views.

    Again not an attack on "you" but if everyone has this staunch viewpoint, how can we ever get to a workable system for all?

  • internet funeral @lemmy.world

    batteries not included