If lets say 10% of people vote for the green party. We know that what people want relates to their messaging and they'd try and take voters away from them as it's easier than taking republicans or people that refuse to vote since you know what the green party stands for. That's different than voting for the social democrats and so on.

You can't lump options 3 and 4 together like that.

Not voting sends the message that people are dissatisfied or feel disenfranchised. Now if the Democrats win they won't care to change. Or even if they nearly win. But if they loose badly they'll have to cater to these voters. And thus a pivot would be in order. But like we're both said, not voting harder to take get a party to move in that direction

So as an individual you have 4 options:

1- vote for Biden: democrats maintain the current path as that's literally what's happening now

2- vote Trump: either they maintain their current path or democrats have to pivot

3- vote third party: if that party gets enough votes one of the main parties will catwr to the messaging of that party to take those voters in the next cycle as it's an easy win

4- don't vote: if enough people don't vote they'll cater more to them next cycle but that's harder to aim in the direction you'd want to promote.

Is that a good enough breakdown? So if I were to rank my options I'd go for 3,4,2,1

It's not within his powers to do so. But he could have the secret service assassinate them. Pardon the perpetrators and then assign whomever he wants the position with threats against the lives of the senate and congress as a whole for all who would vote against assigning this person. Elimate them and have the vote.

Eating the shit sandwich will result in always getting a shit sandwich

They had 4 years to light l find and line someone else up. Biden's age isn't a surprise that snuck up on anyone

That should've healed by then though

I don't disagree. But I'm pretty sure this was intended to be done on the election year. Don't get me wrong, I will not vote for the orange fuzz ball with a gun to my head. But this could've been done earlier in his term

Quick question

Why didn't he do that 3 years ago when he got into office

I like to remind people that the heaviest stones for the pyramids were about 400 tons while a few thousand years later in Lebanon the largest stones for the temple complex in Baalbek are about 1250 tons.

But no one questions that the construction there

I say within 50 years they'll declare it all Israel

You forgot the killings

Here's a link if you want to include in your comment.

It's a site that compares car sizes. This link is for the 3 series

https://www.carsized.com/en/cars/compare/bmw-3-1997-sedan-vs-bmw-3-2018-sedan/

And here's a dodge challenger which surprisingly is fatter but slightly shorter and higher

https://www.carsized.com/en/cars/compare/dodge-challenger-1969-coupe-vs-dodge-challenger-2015-coupe/

Now put in a law saying you can't do that

For uploading game clips I'd assume

I'm giving it to my brother. Or just sell it for $100 to yourself

If someone buys a home that was rented. Would the cap apply to them? Because this might result in a loophole

I completely agree that's what I meant by the 3rd party. Those who will refuse to vote for either and I tend to find that more common from those who would've voted Democrat compared to the ones that would've voted Republican

For us to do so yes. For the government, it constantly breaks the law

Funny-ly enough you can block their signal. Issue is it's also going to block everyone within range

GLBTA? I honestly thought you were spelling something out with that