Line 37 no? Kind of baked into hardware.graphics.extraPackages32? https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/modules/services/hardware/amdvlk.nix#L37
Maaaybe a stupid question as it might just be the same thing done differently. I'm not bright enough to understand the differences.
hardware.graphics
was recently introduced which replaced hardware.opengl
. Now, I've got my amdvlk
, libva
and such configured via hardware.graphics
— recently I came across hardware.amdgpu
which offers a bunch of options.
Should one combine, use one or the other, or does it make any difference at all?
hardware.amdgpu.opencl.enable hardware.amdgpu.legacySupport.enable hardware.amdgpu.initrd.enable hardware.amdgpu.amdvlk.supportExperimental.enable hardware.amdgpu.amdvlk.support32Bit.package hardware.amdgpu.amdvlk.support32Bit.enable hardware.amdgpu.amdvlk.settings hardware.amdgpu.amdvlk.package hardware.amdgpu.amdvlk.enable hardware.graphics.extraPackages32 hardware.graphics.extraPackages hardware.graphics.enable32Bit hardware.graphics.enable
That is, are these two examples the same for all intents and purposes or do either bring anything else?
``` hardware.amdgpu.amdvlk = { enable = true; support32Bit.enable = true; };
VS.
hardware.graphics = { enable = true; enable32Bit = true; extraPackages = with pkgs; [ amdvlk ]; extraPackages32 = with pkgs; [ driversi686Linux.amdvlk ]; }; ```