You only have to consider the plugin developers. Most of them would have the technical ability to do what you mention, but they prefer to use Obsidian instead. Clearly there's a reason for that.
There are many apps that are great editors for this structure on every platform
And Obsidian is one of those apps 🤦 It's has equal amount of "point" to all the other editors you think are somehow more valid - it's just another editor.
I think for some brains it just doesn't click. How do you write a long form document? How would you write documentation? How would you write a blog post?
I tried for a while but I just couldn't understand the concept of "Everything as an outline."
What's one specific point that you think is an outright lie or has been gaslighted away? The linked post addressed my personal concerns, but I want to see if there's something I missed.
This is largely circular logic. “It’s irrelevant what Kagi is doing, as long as I can trust what Kagi is doing.”
The problem is that you can never know what software a company is running in production. So for any service you don't host yourself, at some point you have to just cross your fingers and hope.
We can certainly agree to disagree. I don't encourage you to use Kagi - quite the opposite, I would say it is a terrible fit.
As I said in my original comment, I think it makes perfect sense to replace an itemised list - which needs to be constantly updated - with a generic "all major search engines" which covers everything.
If Yandex being removed isn't an issue, then I'm not sure what could be termed as Proton being cagey.
For me, from a privacy perspective as a user it's largely irrelevant what third-parties they use on the backend as long as my searches stay private.
Adding the statistics for third parties to their stats page would be neat from the user perspective, but I can't imagine what value there would be in publishing that information from Kagi's perspective.
As with any EU company, the Swiss government can compel them to keep logs for an individual user in the case of serious crime. You can use Tor as Proton recommends for that exact use case.
But by default Proton does not keep logs of IP addresses.
Unless there's a very specific application need, I think the most sensible thing would be to ditch Windows. Better for security, better for privacy, better for the world to increase the mainstreaming of Linux.
Thank you for this article. I'm a proton user and had been a bit concerned. The "little guys" comment especially bothered my when I first read it, but the take from this article makes sense. Appreciate you.
You only have to consider the plugin developers. Most of them would have the technical ability to do what you mention, but they prefer to use Obsidian instead. Clearly there's a reason for that.