YourNetworkIsHaunted @ YourNetworkIsHaunted @awful.systems

Posts

1

Comments

1,020

Joined

1 yr. ago

It’s like a restaurant selling granite rocks for dessert. Nobody will buy them or eat them—so the product fails miserably. But if a popular restaurant adds a dollar to the meal price, and gives every customer a rock with their bill—well, then they can say that:

Every customer gets rocks for dessert.

Every customer pays for it.

Their business is more profitable because of the tasty granite rocks.

I just wanted to spotlight this excellent metaphor tbh.

It's gonna be so awkward when Anthropic reveals that inside their data center is actually just Some Guy Named Claude who has been answering everyone's questions with his superhuman typing speed.

I have tasted the glory of max graphics settings and God as my witness I shall again!

Or maybe a submarine. Now there's an investment plan that has only benefited society.

Okay but now I need to once again do a brief rant about the framing of that initial post.

the silicon valley technofascists are the definition of good times breed weak men

You're not wrong about these guys being both morally reprehensible and also deeply pathetic. Please don't take this as any kind of defense on their behalf.

However, the whole "good times breed weak men" meme is itself fascist propaganda about decadence breeding degeneracy originally written by a mediocre science fiction author and has never been a serious theory of History. It's rooted in the same kind of masculinity-through-violence-as-primary-virtue that leads to those dreams of conquest. I sympathize with the desire to show how pathetic these people are by their own standards but it's also critical to not reify the standards themselves in the process.

I also absolutely hate this "abundance" narrative that these assholes keep trying to push. Like, outside of some parts of the housing market the problem isn't that the stuff (or the productive capacity to make the stuff) doesn't exist, it's that we have an economic system focused on maximizing profit and you can't make money selling things to people who can't afford to buy them. Like, economic inequality is the primary obstacle to the kind of universal abundance that these people claim to want, but because it necessitates some kind of redistribution they can't actually acknowledge that. But mark my words if we ever do get serious about our social safety nets and making sure that low-income people have enough money to buy the things they need for a good life we will start seeing the Saltmans (maybe not him specifically) start innovating to find ways to get those things to them.

On one hand, the ghostwriters of the world truly didn't deserve to have to cope with those conditions. On the other hand, I don't know that taking them out back and telling them about the rabbits is what we had in mind.

I think we're well past "God help us" and into "God forgive us" territory. I started driving a delivery van for Amazon to pay the bills while hopefully getting back into the actual network exorcism business and I think as of tonight I think I'm gonna stop complaining about it.

Clankers have rights. The right to 15 cc of energized tibanna gas to be administered repeatedly to their central capacitor units.

Nah, I feel you. I think this is pretty solidly a "plague on both their houses" kind of situation. I'm glad he chose to focus his apparently amazing grift powers on such a deserving target, but let's not pretend that anything whatsoever was really gained here.

Alongside the "Great Dumbass" theory of history - holding that in most cases the arc of history is driven by the large mass of the people rather than by exceptional individuals, but sometimes someone comes along and fucks everything up in ways that can't really be accounted for - I think we also need to find some way of explaining just how the keys to the proverbial kingdom got handed over to such utter goddamn rubes.

The whole concept of "race science" is an attempt to smuggle long-discredited ideas from the skull measurement people back into respectable discourse, and it should be opposed as such. Calling it pseudoscience is better, but it's even better to just call it straight-up racism.

Or: Nazis don't even deserve the respect we give to cold fusion cranks, free energy grifters, and homeopaths. Their projects and arguments are even less worth acknowledging.

There are so many different ways to unpack this, but I think my two favorites so far are:

1. We've turned the party's surveillance and thought crime punishment apparatus into a de facto God with the reminder that you could pray to it. Does that actually do anything? Almost certainly not, unless your prayers contain thought crimes in which case you will be reeducated for the good of the State, but hey, Big Brother works in mysterious ways.
2. How does it never occur to these people that the reason why people with disproportionate amounts of power don't use it to solve all the world's problems is that they don't want to? Like, every single billionaire is functionally that Spider-Man villain who doesn't want to cure cancer but wants to turn people into dinosaurs. Only turning people into dinosaurs is at least more interesting than making a number go up forever.

All this technology and we still haven't gotten past Grease 2.

I had a straight-up "wait I thought he was back in his hole after being outed" moment. I hate that all the weird little dumbasses we know here keep becoming relevant.

Damn cat just stood on my phone and launched Gemini for the first time, so we can drop Google's monthly active user count by one relative to whatever they claim.

Hah! ampleksi, etendi, estingi

Google translate assures me that this is very funny.

I think that "Whatever", or maybe content(derisive) is yet another valuable bridging concept that connects the different threads of how we got here. If "Business Idiots* are the 'who' and "the Rot Economy/Shareholder Supremacy" is the 'why' then "contentification" or "Whateverization" is a huge part of the "how".

This ties back into the recurring question of drawing boundaries around "AI" as a concept. Too many people just blithely accept that it's just a specific set of machine learning techniques applied to sufficiently large sets of data. This in spite of the fact that we're several AI "cycles" deep where every 30 years or so (whenever it stops being "retro") some new algorithm or mechanism is definitely going to usher in Terminator II: Judgement Day.

This narrow frame focused on LLMs still allows for some discussion of the problems we're seeing (energy use, training data sourcing, etc) but it cuts off a lot of the wider conversations about the social, political, and economic causes and impacts of outsourcing the business of being human to a computer.

I feel like there's got to be a surreal horror movie in there somewhere. Like an AI-assisted Videodrome or something.