I don't get why you're so dismissive of public transit being possible. Is it something with the ideological make up of the USA? I could give that until Miami is under water in about a decade. If its for physical limitations though then I couldn't give that, once again the USSR was primarily mass transit. If they could do it back then the USA could do it now.

my desire for fancy treats is going to make your life personally objectively more dangerous. Thats life

Why can't you have public transit everywhere though? The soviet union did it and they are way larger with way more disparate populations than the USA.

I don't think you understand the forces at play here. Gasoline burns at around 1000°c while lithium burns at over 2000°c. There is also the firefighting efforts about it (which is my job) which really suck. For a normal car or diesel fire with a water source we can fight the fire with foam, no problem. The NFPA doesn't even require us to carry Class D (metal fires) fire extinguishers on our trucks. We do have them on our trucks but they are designed for like, small appliances mostly, they don't have enough powder to actually manage a Tesla power system. We have to pull out whoever is inside then basically wait for the dump truck (literally a dump truck full of sand) to show up so we can glass most of the car in order to deny oxygen. Electric cars are a fucking grift, transport should be powered with overhead wires, maybe third rails.

Edit: also if you aren't car pooling why do you own a car? Why enter the "fuck cars" fray if you aren't anti-car?

You don't like, see if things work and stuff? Maybe I'm too used to having to deal with old beaters but checking if doors can be opened from the inside is a critical safety check. Its like checking to see if the seatbelts work. Do you ever drive people around?

I saw that on and couldn't believe it was real. Everyone in that city's government deserves to burn in the summer sun. The only reason to make building bus shelters that complicated is to punish the homeless, it doesn't "just happen." I live over 1000km away and it still makes me mad

Wait aren't you the one who actually owns one of these lithium sand buckets?

He was so relatable but still le epic bacon guy before, no don't look at that photo with Maxwell

my shortcut to hexbear is still chapo.chat

👏 Where 👏 are 👏 these 👏 sugar 👏 daddies? 👏

Taiwan, South Korea, Poland

One of these things is not like the other. South Korea and Taiwan are both areas that should be re-unified with the countries that cut them off of, if there is a Formosan population to return it to that may be a solution with Taiwan as well. What's your beef with Poland?

Your question is loaded with too many assumptions. You assume international laws as they stand are good as they stand, you assume torture works to obtain information, but more than that you assume these forces exist in a vacuum. By your logic and with your assumptions obviously evil is more powerful but you've papered over so much that the answer to your question is meaningless.

There is also the materialist part of your problem which is it assumes both sides have access to the same resources (and that they work the way you think they do). How many more Good people are there than Evil? Do the Evil people have the knowledge and skills to produce the weapons to facilitate the tactics you lay out or would they rely on Good people to produce them? If they do then what happens if the Good people object to making the weapons that facilitate their winning tactics? How can the Evil people conscript the Good people into performing their duty without those weapons?

Finally it assumes states act in unified ways under central control, and that everyone in those states are state actors and act under command of the state. There is no country in the history of the world where that has ever been true, not only does it go against the concept of free will (which your name suggests you don't believe in) it also assumes that either states are conscious entities of themselves or there are conscious people controlling these states and every single person in them or acting on their behalf.

That has definitely been the case for any STI testing I've had

Vuze has always been good to me though I don't know if it is strictly "optimal."

Why do they argue against themselves and still lose? Who asked for that?

Corporate law is going to stop any of those guys from getting arrested for theft and that is a crying shame. I hate copyright as much as the next guy but these guys ain't it

If this is a surprise to anyone I would insult their critical thinking. How could that have gone any other way? Obviously that land was going to be more valuable as single family detached homes in a wildly speculative real estate environment and of course developers would know that. Of course these developers would have influence too, they were Ford's base in the 905!

I got so used to being in a downvote free environment, having them really makes it easy to quietly quell this stuff

Hard same