So wouldnt a sugnificant number of people want more than they have?

You can still bribe leaders in a communist system. Woman amd healthcare exist in lots of capalist systems.

While most people who were alive in the former Soviet block would prefer to go back to when it existed because it caused a huge economic disaster when they sold the countries off for parts and privatized everything for the oligarchs

Not even close to most. Make friends in Europe.

The important part is that it's a system not focused on things like GDP, growth, or money made by corporations to determine success, but the happiness and well-being of all the humans as a collective

Don't I have the power over my happiness in capitalism because I can work towards higher wealth extraction to achieve my own goals?.

Who decides when growth isn't required?

The Soviet Union threatened my parents and grandparents lives. My country did try it, we decided against it. All the issues that capitalism has, communism still has. Add centralized power, and human exploitation is worse. Communism will not solve your problems.

Why wouldn't communism lead to cancer like growth? Wouldn't political leaders be incentivized by the masses for never ending quality of life improvements?

Money is not the problem, it's people. If replace the system, nothing changes. If we want sustainability, that needs to be desired by the masses, and that is achievable without communism.

That is naive. People will still fight for power and exploit others to get it.

Doesn't communism consume everything too?

Never once.

Several benshmarks were posted today. The CPU is comparable to M3, modern games run at about 30fps, no idea how the GPU compares to M3.

Edit: I'm unsure which Snapdragon chips were tested.

If I worked at Google I 100% would have had the same policy. I thought the controversy was not grounded.

I rewatched the first episode a few minutes ago. It's not as bad as I remember haha. I still take issues with the arbitary power levels.

Edit: just rewatched the first episode, not as bad as I remember.

I watched most of My Hero Acidemia and Hunter X Hunter, and I don't see the appeal. The Cyberpunk pilot, to me, felt ungrounded. The mc hacking with ease appeals more to a power fantasy rather than a reflection of any meaningful character ability. And the dialogue was painfully on the nose, the MC warning about highway bandits 10 seconds before being attacked made me think that they never wrote a second draft of the script.

I'll watch if someday, and I appreciate your enjoyment of the show, but I just don't see what others see in it, from the pilot.

Edit: just rewatched the first episode, not as bad as I remember.

I only saw the first episode, but it felt like a standard post-2010 Trigger anime to me.

Edit: just rewatched the first episode, not as bad as I remember. Where was the line I meantioned below? I swear it was there when I watched the show the first time.

I stopped watching after the main character said they were on the gang banger highway and then they got shot up by gang bangers.

Was the show that bad?

Arm based platform with modern games over cell connection.

I consider this comment naive. Microsoft selling a powerful arm based handheld might be extremely successful and totally viable. They have already done the rnd for x86 backwards compatibility on arm and have a close relationship with Qualcomm.

I enjoy The Simpsons movie far more than the seasons of The Simpsons coming out at the time, but it is still not as good as the first 9 seasons. I enjoyed it well enough, despite its flaws, so I recommend it.

Do I upvote this post if I disagree or only if I know most people disagree with it?

Presumable most software is compressible. The more services you have, the higher the risk, but that is not unique to any particular feature in windows.