Skip Navigation
Link test

Markdowned link

Naked link: https://youtube.com/

https://youtube.com/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2G5IR9gAqI

1
NASA terminating $420 million in contracts not aligned with its new priorities
  • Nono no need to LIVE on the moon. Living in microgravity is bad for health. Living in rotating space habitats is the only realistic way we get space cities.

    But yes, the moon definitely has the advantage of no atmosphere. Basically, the moon is where we place our industries (for the orbital and interplanetary economies).

  • NASA terminating $420 million in contracts not aligned with its new priorities
  • Mars is so incredibly useless from the point of view of advancing civilization.

    We can do so much stuff on the moon a lot better than on Mars. In short, the moon is MEANT to be industrialised by us.

    Here's a video, cuz I'm too lazy to type out everything. Also, sorry for the YouTube link. I don't think this fellow uploads anywhere else.

    Also don't get me wrong. Mars is really cool as a scientific curiosity. It's just not suitable for advancing civilization yet.

  • Simple test

    To see if everything is still working correctly

    0
    Url and custom thumbnail
    thenarwhal.ca How wealthy Canadians donate to charity — and also fund mining companies | The Narwhal

    Mining companies are seeing a windfall in funding more new exploration — via a loophole that offers charitable tax breaks to wealthy donors

    How wealthy Canadians donate to charity — and also fund mining companies | The Narwhal
    0
    InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TE
    TerranFenrir @lemmy.ca
    Posts 12
    Comments 19