Good.

Was ist denn das für ein Quatschkommentar? Die EU gab es bei der Gründung des Europarats noch nicht. Die EU wurde selbst erst Jahrzehnte später gegründet. Sie hat den Europarat 1949 nicht gegründet.

Das zeigt eher deine Denkmuster als ein etwaiges Fehlverhalten der EU.

Gesetze verabschieden tut der Europarat auch nicht. Das ist eine Menschenrechtsorganisation. Er hat auch viel mehr Mitgliedsstaaten als die EU.

Spain is already phasing out nuclear energy currently and Sweden wants to do it after sufficient renewables are built. Among many other states.

Nuclear is just not profitable compared to renewables. France is exporting at a loss if one would consider all associated costs (privatization of profits and socialization of losses is creating bad incentives).

For sure, but there are probably places in Germany […]

There are not.

There are still large areas in southern Germany where you’re not allowed to eat wild mushrooms and every boar that is hunted must be tested for radiation. That is because of the fallout from Chernobyl 38 years ago and 1400 km away.

The article is badly researched.

This “red-green” coalition banned new reactors, announced a shutdown of existing ones by 2022

The red-green coalition did not announce the 2022 date. They (Greens/SPD) announced a soft phase-out between 2015-2020 in conjunction with building renewables. This planned shift from nuclear to renewables was reverted by Merkel (CDU = conservatives) in 2010. They (CDU) changed their mind one year later in 2011 and announced the 2022 date; but without the emphasis on replacing it with renewables. This back and forth was also quite the expensive mistake by the CDU on multiple levels, because energy corporations were now entitled financial compensation for their old reactors.

German-Israeli activist Iris Hefets was arrested for the first time in Berlin just a few weeks after the start of Israel’s war on Gaza last October – for holding a sign which read [...]

1. That was not the first time she was arrested.

2. Protesters blocked the main train station in a city of millions (after explicitly being denied permission to do so) and refused to leave after being ordered to by the police. What else would anyone expect to happen? This had nothing to do with their sign.

Here's another perspective on the same event: https://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/strafbare-ausrufe-und-festnahmen-polizei-lost-palastina-demo-am-berliner-hauptbahnhof-auf-11444201.html

"Germany" = a German bank
"seizing money" = temporarily frozen bank account until a legal dispute is settled

As a German it's fully in your right to disagree with the state and with the police (I certainly don't agree with everything that's going on). However, this comment of yours is distorting the reality too much, for my taste, to remain silent.

• "terrifying state repression" = less public funding for some artists, more for others (not getting free money doesn't mean you're being "repressed")
• "Berlin police has enacted checkpoints in immigrant neighbourhoods" = That did not happen. It is a myth.
• "Politicians actively singling out activists on social media and redirecting insane amounts of hate their way." = Politicians responding in kind when you mention them in a tweet. They are humans and they are allowed to respond to you.
• "to allow universities to exmatriculate students on behavioural grounds (aka political stances)." = Berlin trying to fix a legal loophole that prevents them from exmatriculating one student that physically assaulted a Jew for antisemitic reasons breaking his face bones. Outside of Berlin that would've been grounds for immediate exmatriculation within the existing laws.

I do agree with your general stance, but there is no need to exaggerate/distort the issues we're facing.

The German constitution makes no guarantee of free speech. It’s not a legally protected right there, and Germany is world infamous for not having free speech.

That's an internet meme and it is wrong. Germany ranks place 21 of 180 in the WPFI and rank 10 of 165 according to GSDI.

There is no state in the world with fully 100% free speech. Even in the USA there are limits to free speech; some are even considered criminal and some will land you in jail. What matters is what freedom of speech entails. Germany does very much have free speech - much more than the vast majority of countries on the planet. Meinungsfreiheit can be translated as freedom of opinion/expression/speech and is article 5 of our constitution as well as article 11 of the EU charta.

He drove me back into using RSS after more than a decade for staying up to date. Much better for the mental health. Thankfully, since Wordpress and also some other CMS have the RSS feature enabled by default, many websites have it even if they’re not advertising it.

Wishing you all the best!

I‘m fine with discussion. But I see little value in discussing a text with someone who has not read it. We don’t have to guess their intentions when they already wrote it down quite clearly. Neither do I see a reason to doubt their intentions based on timing. Antisemitism (violence against Jews) in Germany has been sharply on the rise in the last few years and it is the job of the Landeszentrale to debunk some of the myths that foster it.

The main point of the paper is to correct these five myths about Israel and that is what it does. It is very focused on this and one-sided, obviously. One might think it is bad taste to ignore current events. Maybe. But it does exactly what it says and I found it informative.

Are we supposed to learn and debate history while a people is exterminated?

Yes. That might be a good first step. It takes about one hour. There is much one can critique Israel for - let’s stick to the truths.

Are we reading the same link? You're doing quite some mind acrobatics here by picking various small quotes/passages from only the start of the text and putting your own spin on it. This narrative is in your head, not in the article.

This is for the most part a very good brochure and the uninformed people here that only read a faulty summary or headline should probably read it, then make up their mind instead of being instinctively angry. Especially the part where it talks about the misconceptions with the typical „expansion comparison maps“ and what they really show was informative.

Wünschenswert wäre es. Tatsächlich prüfen alle drei von dir genannten Berufsgruppen vor allem Verdachtsfälle und haben selbst dafür oft zu wenig Zeit/Personal.

Mir leuchtet die Argumentation nicht ein. Das sind ja keine zufälligen randomisierten Stichproben, sondern gezielte Prüfungen bei Verdachtsfällen. Ein Anstieg der Trefferquote „trotz“ weniger Tests kann also genauso gut auf geschicktere Auswahl hindeuten und lässt eher wenig Rückschlüsse auf die allgemeine Sachlage zu.

Ähnlich wie bei Corona: Wenn man morgens die ganze Belegschaft testet, hatte man nur wenige Positive. Testet man nur noch die, die Husten, steigt die Positivrate obwohl man weniger Personen testet. Testet man nur die, die Husten und auch Fieber haben, verstärkt sich der Effekt noch weiter, usw.

Feedbro, it's a browser extension.

I‘m using a RSS reader with rule based filters to remove uninteresting articles (to me) and upvote or downvote articles with certain keywords (for me). That way I can aggregate lots of media and have my own personal feed.

It takes some time to set up and fine-tune, though.

Hält für Faschos ein Schild hoch auf dem "unser Land zuerst!" steht und fährt im Anschluss nach Hause in die Schweiz zu ihrer singhalesischen Frau. Der andere verbringt deutsche Gedenktage am liebsten in Russland. Schöne Patrioten sind das. Was darf eigentlich Satire? Der Postillon hätte sich kaum einen besseren Spruch ausdenken können.