Tartas1995 @ Tartas1995 @discuss.tchncs.de

帖子

2

评论

836

加入于

2 yr. ago

https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09089

"Productivity gain"

If anything, your position is in opposition to nihilism.

There are different kinds of nihilism. Your position is in contradiction with the "purest" form. The absence of an objective value in anything and everything. Your position clearly values personal consent.

There are other kind of nihilism, like political nihilism, might not be in conflict with your position. On the other hand, existential nihilism, the belief that there is no inherent meaning/value in life, might seem to align with your position but I think it is difficult to argue in favor of consent, even to being alive, while believing that life is inherently meaningless. I mean, why does the consent of a meaningless being matter to anyone? Of course, you could take an adsurdism position to it but then I would argue that calling you nihilistic would be a mischaracterization.

https://youtu.be/nu6C2KL_S9o

The classic "it is not big enough" while actively preventing the user base to grow.

I stopped gaming because of this shit.

They just don't need to build their shit on something that requires wine. While there are solutions, just make it run natively.

Because you know the actual enemy, you defend a meme that demonises "propagandised individuals" instead of the enemy. Interesting choice.

No i didn't.

I understand what capitalists are and he does too. We agree with the definition.

He just feels forced to conflate both to justify a toxic meme.

Of course, it works. The tech was never the issue. The issue is that they think that linux is easier to modify to break the kernel anti cheat. It is a PR issue, when there is enough money, magically the pr issue is gone.

As if the rhetoric of today has no influence on the rhetoric of tomorrow.

But even in this very short sighted context, the conflation of "propagandised individuals" and "capitalist" is obviously toxic to the aim of archiving communism.

I will take a wild guess that you have many friends who are raised in capitalistic environments and who have been exposed to anti communism propaganda. Some of that propaganda probably worked on them and consequently they are propagandised individuals. But I doubt you would call them capitalist and enemy. Ofc, you wouldn't as you would special plead for them, while happily supporting conflating propagandised individuals with capitalists and the enemy.

Thanks for proving my point. Your "us vs them" thinking caused you to confuse "propagandised individuals" with "capitalist" and ignore the big difference between both.

"Capitalist" is a class that in communism doesn't exist. So consequently, after the implementation of communism there is no enemy of the class "capitalist" anymore. So again, communism would serve all people.

"Propagandised individuals" wouldn't disappear after the implementation of communism. They can be discriminate against.

I am excited for the steam machine because of the anti cheat issue. If we push for linux gaming, they are forced to either find a spyware kernel anti cheat solution for linux or drop the spyware kernel anti cheat.

I don't think promoting these sentiments does anything but propagandise an "us vs them" mentality that is fundamentally toxic to the idea of communism.

"Four legs good, two legs bad" is all, I am gonna say.

Thank you! Monica doesn't deserve this.

Can we keep Monica out of trump x bubba jokes?

There is so much disrespect

So he has a story about his mother making her own decision over her own life and body and he is happy about her decision, I wonder if there is a lesson in that.

For better usage: you don't need to write it into console. Just write it in an array!

Well take their wealth. They got their labours worth of resources and spent them.

No, sorry, I didn't mean you are wrong. I mean that the comic answers it as an instrumental goal and as the author wrote the conversation, the question was intended to be about the instrumental goal.

But your comment wasn't wrong. In fact, it added to the comic. Your comment highlight the difference between their instrumental and terminal goal and the implications of it.

I am thankful for your comment and I appreciate you for it. My intentions were to add to yours and not to critic it. Thanks

The question was about the instrumental goal and yours is about the terminal* goal.

So there is the hidden sad reality that the ceo doesn't know what that labor even is.