No, sorry, I didn't mean you are wrong. I mean that the comic answers it as an instrumental goal and as the author wrote the conversation, the question was intended to be about the instrumental goal.
But your comment wasn't wrong. In fact, it added to the comic. Your comment highlight the difference between their instrumental and terminal goal and the implications of it.
I am thankful for your comment and I appreciate you for it. My intentions were to add to yours and not to critic it. Thanks
I think it is rather questionable to express that any of the real world practices of the porn industry is "outside the scope" when judging the real world practices of hooters. I think it is shameful that hooters doesn't have very clear guidelines. I think it is shameful to make "jokes" that could make someone uncomfortable in such a dynamic. And okay, the man is probably lying to his wife and speaks in vague terms. He probably wants to look at the servers, but does he do more? That is your assumption. Understandable one but an assumption. So let's grant that he makes weird jokes to the servers. Is he really less of a creep when he would watching Mia Khalifa porn? Of course, as Mia probably wouldn't know that he specifically is watching, he would cause less harm in a sense, but the question is not harm reduction but being a creep.
I don't see how you conclude that e.g. the man in the post plans to bend the rules at all.
The rest of your comment is disappointing. You know that I didn't mean that a customer can't sexually assault a server or former server. I meant that if the server quits, they are not longer being sexualized as part of their job and unless people are fucking creeps, their former employment should continue to sexualize them.
Also well it is a regrettable career. That doesn't mean you have to regret it. But it is certainly regrettable like any other career. And women like Mia Khalifa have expressed regret in the past and yet while she was expressing regret, porn videos of her were widely available and consumed. That is what I was talking about. Not that the career is always ending in regret.
My arguments is based on nothing but what i have personally seen? Lol. That is a funny thing to say. Everyone remotely honest, will be able to tell that nothing is further from the truth.
Because I used a common phrase to express that just because the workers at those companies are outraged over the work conditions, it doesn't make them unable to be aware and understand the societal issue; I literally talk about what I don't see and consequently your point makes somehow more sense?
What? You commented on an article about workers of ai companies, you told them to just not do it. And now you are acting like i am choosing to talk about the ai workers? That is the topic at hand!
Other people could create it, yeah. The workers of ai companies are the ones complaining though. Other workers would have the same great reason to complain. But the workers of ai companies blame the ai companies who are directly responsible for their situation.
No? Why would I see workers in this thread? How would that change anything about the reality of their working conditions or the ability of ai companies to improve them?
Thanks, I enjoyed explore the topic with you. Ch00f is doing a good job that expressing their thoughts. I am not convinced but I respect their effort and skill.
Yes because they could create better working conditions of their workers. They could be the first step to fix societal issues. And I don't see where it is written that the workers are not aware and not complaining about the societal issue. Because they can do both at once.
For better usage: you don't need to write it into console. Just write it in an array!