That framing is bs. We have heard of ai screen tools long before there was any ai that would write a half way decent resume.
Well the average is normed to 100. So 120 is not the minimum for above average. The top 9% of population would be above 115iq.
While high IQ is more of a diagnosis than anything, the statistics are real. I don't know why you don't want to consider top 9% as "high".
What is high in your opinion?
I am not promoting an idea. I am just stating simple facts. Just to contextualize the issue. People are underappreciating the relative peacefulness of protests.
Guys, remember protests are the alternative. Even the volent ones are the alternative.
Remember what humans did before we protested.
100% that is why they only appreciate realistic art styles and I guess super trendy stuff like ghibli.
And of course, "appreciate" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here.
They are dehumanizing everyone else too.
Can you think of anyone precise and clear enough in their speech that some "needless" repetition and context wouldn't drastically improve your understanding of what they say?
Can you imagine how upset they would be if you took them by their very word and not what they meant?
In their mind, authors (and probably everyone else) are machines. The kindness of trying to truly understand them is not given. They should be "flawless".
I have read books in which the definition of certain words get redefined to be more precise and clear in the communication while making things less verbose. I don't think an ai summary will reliably properly introduce me to the definition on page 100 of a book that took the previous 99 pages to set up the required definitions to understand the definition it gives on page 100.
But I could be wrong.
Some of the tested models were specifically "reasoning" LLM models. Please tell me that the "reasoning" model is not intended to be used for "reasoning". Please.
It works the same way.
1 | |
2 | |
3 | |
4 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | |
11 | |
12 | |
| | |
2 | |
3 | |
4 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | |
11 | |
12 | 1
| | |
| | |
3 | |
4 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | |
11 | |
12 2 1
| | |
| | |
3 | |
4 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | |
11 1 |
12 2 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
4 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | |
11 1 |
12 2 3
| | |
| | |
1 | |
4 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | |
11 | |
12 2 3
| | |
| | |
1 | |
4 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | |
11 | 2
12 | 3
| | |
| | |
| | |
4 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | 1
11 | 2
12 | 3
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | 1
11 | 2
12 4 3
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | |
11 1 2
12 4 3
| | |
| | |
| | |
2 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | |
11 1 |
12 4 3
| | |
| | |
1 | |
2 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | |
11 | |
12 4 3
| | |
| | |
1 | |
2 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | |
11 3 |
12 4 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 | |
10 2 |
11 3 |
12 4 1
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 1 |
10 2 |
11 3 |
12 4 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 1 |
10 2 |
11 3 |
12 4 5
And so on... As you can see, when there was a 3 stack in the right pole, and moved the 4, for the solution to create space for the 5, we move the 3 stack as if it is just a 3 tower and we will end up with a 4 stack tower, allowing us to move the 5 and now we need to move the 4 stack on the 5. As the 4 stack is even, we would start by moving the 1 to the left stack, placing the 2 on the 5 and then the 1 on the 2, creating a 2 stack, now we can move the 3 on the left pole, now we solve the 2 stack, as it is even, we move the 1 to the 4 and the 2 on the 3 and then the 1 on the 2, creating a 3 stack and allowing us to move the 4 onto the 5. Now we solve the 3 stack onto the 4. It is odd, so we solve as we solve the previous 3 tower.
A bigger tower is just solving a 1 smaller tower basically twice.
So for solving 12, you solve 11 and move the 12 to the spot, to solve 11 again. To solve 11, you solve 10 and move the 11 and solve 10 again....
Hey for anyone who doesn't know how to solve tower of Hanoi, there is a simple algorithm.
1. |. |
2. |. |
3. |. |
Let's say, we want to move the center rod.
Count the stack of disks that you need to move: e.g. 3
If it is even, start with placing the first disk on the spot that you don't want to move the tower to. If it is odd, start with placing the first disk on the spot that you want to move the tower to.
|. |. |
2. |. |
3. 1. |
|. |. |
|. |. |
3. 1. 2
|. |. |
|. |. 1
3. |. 2
|. |. |
|. |. 1
|. 3. 2
Now the 2 stack is basically a new Hanoi tower.
That tower is even and we start with placing the first disk on the spot that we don't want to land on
|. |. |
|. |. |
1. 3. 2
|. |. |
|. 2. |
1. 3. |
|. 1. |
|. 2. |
|. 3. |
And we solved the tower. It is that easy
I think he means pear 🍐
Elon is so incompetent that he thinks he is playing poker but shows everyone his hand.
We see you, Elon, go ahead. The world is watching as you wanted. We will watch you lose to yourself.
The truth is the for a lot of us being here in the first place was a political stance.
I am happy to report that I am speaking up for trans and queer people while being cis, independent of pride month. And I think we all should, independent of sexual identify or preference.
Could and should ❤️ get fucked!
Recreate? I am not sure if "worsen" wouldn't be more accurate.
What is the lie? Let me guess, I don't fit in your boxes! How rude of me!
I love how you think we are the same person and imply that he is dog whistling for the AFD. While on my account from 3 hours earlier, I have this comment. https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/18782896
I mean, are we the same person and not supporting the afd? Or are we not the same person and I don't support the afd?
Or Maybe... I am planning the long con! How sneaky! Because obviously you can't be wrong./s
You can't name 1 male issue that general feminist movement is actively trying to tackle but they are fighting for it. You seem to believe that a person can't support a movement and disagree with the behavior of the uninformed masses of the same movement. You seem to believe that a symbol can only mean 1 thing. And undoubtedly, you are obviously correct about everything. /s
Yes we talk about symbols, Germans, especially AFD (they are Nazis) and different interpretations of these symbols, I think of that argument. I don't know how you are thinking but usually things mentioned in a conversation inspire me.
Ah yes. The best you can do is a vague motion.
Let's talk about the women's issues that I can name on the top of my head that the feminist movement tries to tackle (and I obviously support):
- wage gap
- not being taken seriously by e.g. doctors
- me too
- domestic violence
- the whole double standard of how emotions get framed, women's emotions get framed as childish and overreactive.
- creating awareness for the mental workload of planing an household which often women have to handle.
- abortion rights
Lol, I am not. And a lot of people who call themselves feminists are sexist. If you disagree with that, please name 1 thing that the general feminist movement is tackling in support of men. And the current patriarchy is harmful for men too. So there are things to tackle.
A German is not forced to use a symbol in an international setting in the same way, they might use it in the local setting.
Please don't use insults.
I keep hearing about how you shouldn't laugh over your own jokes but when I watch a video or listen to a podcast, I find it much more authentic and likable when they laugh over their own jokes in a conversation. You know, vibes.