Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
4
Comments
73
Joined
1 mo. ago

  • If we were in the Doctor Who community I'd have a meme ready for you.

  • On a visual note,

    The titles are presented on a series of retro-styled trading cards, an homage to Star Trek's colorful 1960s-era merchandise, with a portrait of one of the show's stars on each card.


    Sorry Collider, these reference a set of 1976 sticker cards (with the colour scheme keyed up for 2026). You were off by a decade 🙂

  • [BBC director general Matt Brittin] said the exit of showrunner Russell T Davies, producer Bad Wolf, and co-producer Disney+ was an opportunity for creative renewal.

    No offense, guys 🤣

  • Yuck, SNW was all the nostalgia tripping I could take. More boldly going, please!

  • It certainly lowered my enthusiasm for SFA s2, knowing they went hard with a cliffhanger finale... That show had a lot of spirit and promise, I wanted to follow those kids through the academy.

    SNW — I know I'm in the minority here, but I couldn't get into the show's tone, and especially the way it's leading doggedly towards TOS, literally checking boxes for each continuity item. It feels like a dead man walking, and even more so now. This is actually the first time I've looked forward to a Trek show ending.

  • In terms of wall to wall far out aliens, Earth's future, Rose all giddy traveling with a new Doctor, and of course Cassandra, my mind went to The end of the world, but that was probably too in the nose.

    I quite agree about The beast below, also a companion's first space jaunt, right? And boom, Amy get to walk away from Omelas, but it's future UK in space. Can we just stick to Moffat episodes?

  • We may both rag on the silliness and threadbare stories in this show, particularly in this episode — but I don't need any more detail on Jack Harkness turning into a giant head in a fish tank. You die and revive enough times, that's the end result 🤣

    I think that's the sort of gaps that could never be filled satisfactorily on screen. They're much better as a space where viewers' imaginations roam wild instead.

  • I was going to rewatch this, but reading @ 's rundown soured the memory of it a bit. It's an episode I've watched a bunch, and it has some elements I really like:

    • The cat nun nurses, terrific makeup, crazy concept!
    • The face of Boe, another wild and well executed idea.
    • Cassandra! Probably the most iconic trampoline recurring villain in the early show. Even now, fans post cookies and embroideries in her likeness, even though she's visually and thematically horrible!
    • Let's just add the Duke of Manhattan, too. What a throwaway character. And I like how his neck grates when he moves.
    • And I like Chip, for some reason. In this bonkers rogues gallery, he's just a dude in scrubs with some paint on his face. Somehow that, a silly gait and the earnest, wide eyed acting is enough.

    The allure of the body swap has worn off the more I watch this, though. Not a lot of actors can pull it off, much less so when the person they're impersonating is Zoë Wanamaker at her peak of campiness.

    By now when I think back on this episode, I remember Billie Piper complimenting her own arse, and skip to the one with the werewolf instead. Oops, spoilers for next week's throwback discussion!

    This is honestly not a terrific story as a whole — VS has already pointed out the biggest pratfalls — but at least it's so full of wacky characters and running away from human guinea pigs, you won't have time to say "that's not how medicines work".

  • Oh, so jealous. TBF, it's still hilarious on fourth and fifth watching.

  • Barclay was evading real life conflict and pressure for sure, but also doing erotic power play with holo-versions of his crewmates... I think that last part was an early taste of our current deepfake porn reality 😬

    Either way, Lower decks made it clear that into the 2380s, cleaning out the holodeck biofilters was still the worst job on a starship:

    People really use it for that?

    Oh yeah. It's mostly that.

  • There may be a joke flying over my head here, but Barclay only appears, having rather consequential holo addition issues, two full seasons after the Bynars' upgrades?

  • I dunno, it's almost too neat and tasteful, isn't it? I checked out Matt Ferguson's other anniversary posters, and they have a lot more going on visually.

    Sure, this movie's tone is very different, but still.

  • Love the look on the cop's face on the right hand side. Like, "That's it, I'm transferring out of San Francisco ASAP".

  • Oh man, was there a four month gap between the christmas special and this? And people moan about "Space babies" being a poor season opener...

  • Looking forward to it. The Chinese scifi I've watched hasn't been great, but I'm hoping this will serve as the gateway I need to start the original language Three body problem series... No pressure!

  • The script where Alexander interns behind the counter for a week just writes itself.

    WORF: [exasperated sigh]

  • Especially in a world with replicator technology 🖖

  • Hm, interesting. I'm a bit wary of science fiction's ability to grapple with "AI" while techbros crowbar their glorified Tamagotchi into anything with a chipset — promoting the products with allusions to scifi that the eager marketers clearly haven't understood.

    But I'll give this a watch on your suggestion that it has Star Trek elements, or vibes 🙂 As long as it isn't "The measure of a man" with Grok in the defendant's seat...

  • Well, only if you have occasion to send it somewhere exciting. Like an intercontinental package, a mesaage in a bottle or something.

  • Blorp @lemmy.zip

    Is Blorp supposed to clone the default browser process like this?

    Doctor Who Social Club @startrek.website

    "Thanks anyway"

    Doctor Who Social Club @startrek.website

    BBC axes hundreds of news and TV jobs in £500m savings drive

    Doctor Who Social Club @startrek.website

    Daft fan theory, promise I won't make a habit of those