On Android and iOS, primary actions are on the right.
- https://m3.material.io/components/dialogs/guidelines
- https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guidelines/alerts
Windows is left:
Sometimes this changes based on RTL languages, but this is the case for English as least. I sometimes don't bother flipping it for Windows and instead focus more on making sure the keyboard works as expected (Enter, Escape, Tab)
The meme format is awesome, but JSON differentiates strings with ".
{ "key": 1337 } vs { "key": "1337" }.
You might be thinking yaml? (Though it supports ' and " for explicit string types, technically)
But integer vs float? Good luck.
There is no section 15 or 16 in GPLv3, but I did find section 7 saying:
Requiring preservation of specified reasonable legal notices or author attributions in that material or in the Appropriate Legal Notices displayed by works containing it; or
But that's an optional thing that you must add onto the GPLv3 license. I'll have to keep that in mind for the future.
That would explain why what I've read mentioned it's not guaranteed in GPLv3 (when comparing to MIT). I'll have to figure out what that notice would look like.
GPL has no requirements for author attribution which is contrary to the entire point of an MIT license.
That's why I described it as joining the Borg. You release individualism and freely give it to the collective. That's cool, and I get the ethos behind all that, but I don't want to add any of those constraints to my code. I just don't want credit for my work or the others to get lost. I don't think it's a hard ask.
Regardless, we ended up ultimately being a full replacement for the other project.
I don't care if people make money to use my code. I just want my name attached to it somehow, even if you make it closed sourced which is MIT and OpenBSD. I hope you do use my code and even if you heavily reference it to make something new, carry that forward so more can learn and benefit.
I also don't understand "better for the end user" arguments either. I have a library that people want to be included in another project, but that project is GPL. They won't merge my code unless I change my code to be GPL. So everyone who wants them merged is out of luck. I can't merge their code either with mine. What is supposed to happen is I freely give up my name to the code and restrict it to only being GPL and for GPL projects. Essentially, assimilate and join with the Borg. No, thanks.
And while that's from my experience, I've also seen good projects get traction, have excitement over it, and fall off the earth because they end up making it GPL. Everyone interested in adopting it, personal or business, just disappear. Then something with less restrictions comes along and gets adopted.
End-users move to what's better for them, and if you have a library that is only for GPL, you can end up limiting your options with a wasteful purity test. If you want it to be free you'd give freely with no restrictions. And if you think, "You can contact me to discuss licensing" that doesn't happen. It's still a restriction and almost nobody actually bothers.
They're deluding themselves if they think removing the word "had" to avoid a passive voice is better ("judge had struck down").
You left out the hundred of lines from the library you're importing. Where's all the code for robotparser?
You can import libraries with C# too. That says nothing about the differences between languages.
Phone material stopped mattering the moment camera bumps became a thing. Now, nearly everyone slaps a case to balance out the bump.
That said, I miss my completely mirrored-back Sony Xperia Z5 Premium.
No, but they'll mention in their commercials how many millions they helped donate to charity. They'll include a shot of somebody in a wheelchair or with some sort of injury smiling. Then they'll show one of their workers smiling. Then, for some reason, the sun blowing out the camera lens. Finally they'll show their logo and the charity's logo, maybe with a line saying how much they care.
Recently, Mr. Lawrence said, customers have been snapping up used Teslas for a little over $20,000, after applying a $4,000 federal tax credit.
3rd sentence?
I'll share the rest because the paywall:
Carmakers including Tesla, Ford, General Motors and Stellantis, the owner of Jeep, have announced plans for electric vehicles that would sell new for as little as $25,000.
More than half of the used electric vehicles on the market sell for less than $30,000, according to Recurrent, a research firm that focuses on the used E.V. market.
standard keyboard
That's easy: Alt+130
But for a tenkeyless one, that's what Wikipedia highlighting is for.