Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SC
Posts
1
Comments
400
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • If on he other hand you want a transition that's really painful and slow but sooo rewarding (highly subjective, of course) you can look into nushell. They just said "screw this 50 years of conceptual baggage and let's do it data centric and proper".

    I still am at perhaps 10% the speed of my zsh setup but the concepts are so intriguing I'm sticking to it. At least I try to ...

  • I don't see you changing her view no matter what facts you'd find.

    You're literally trying to find a shitload of brainwashing with a counter argument by example...

    Alternative approach: Understand her believes. Not on a high level but authentically. Why is she against abortion? Is it because she sees the unborn life as holy? If yes try to understand what her believes tells her how poor children should be treated. If it's because she believes women should be getting children no matter what personally I would give up that route on digging deeper but perhaps you have better ideas.

    The same goes for anti Islam, homophobia, etc. The only chance you have is to understand where she's coming from, what fears and hopes manifest.

    If she's a traditional Christian then involve her in her opinions about different parts of the Bible.

    Your best bet is to not try to change her view directly. It's by helping her realize that those dipshits are not representing her believes. Use her empathy by embracing it with your own.

    And if that should fail: from one stranger to another, please know that you'll still be loved from the other end of the world. 🤗

  • I get where you're coming from but movie audio also fails here. The same darkness discussion arises about dialogue-to-explosion volume regularly :)

    That doesn't take away from what you said they "proper" audio work is done that way ...

  • Braucht MS nicht Mal, limux ist an der Bürokratie gescheitert.

    Wenn ich mich Recht erinnere hat München sogar Accenture bezahlt, damit die sagten "ihr habt noch Windows, beides gleichzeitig ist teuer".

    Und dann gab's noch den ganzen bullshit mit "aber Landesbehörde X kann nur docx lesen" und so weiter.

    MS hat da glaube ich nur suffisant zugesehen am Ende ...

    Oh und persönlicher Eindruck:die Nutzer waren dem Projekt egal. Libreoffice sieht anders aus und fühlt sich anders an, sowas mit abgefangen werden. Wurde aber nicht.

  • Thanks! Highly appreciated :) Your "compile" time alone I wasted when I accidently screwed up disk encryption - and couldn't figure out what's wrong with my kernel parameters for a long time. So your numbers are not really shocking.

    Edit: decrypted message.

  • Yay AMA! ❤️

    How do you feel when you(have to use) a different linux system of that happens? Is it as different that it's like "using" MacOS or Windows to you?

    How lo does it take you to set up a system from scratch?

    what's the biggest downside from your perspective?

    Thanks in advance!

  • Interesting! I've never heard the male form used except specifically when talking about a male person. I'd guess it's a regional thing again (die/das Nutella anyone?).

    But for the single mom/dad I've not heard that as a derogative in daily speech.

    For me it makes sense to talk about a situation from the perspective of the people in the situation and not some circumstance.

  • Because anything can be framed negative and without transparency about your personal ruleset on what those empty words mean it's just Fox News brabble.

    It's not about tolerating intolerance, not at all. It's about transparent consistency. That's what preventing the powertrip: rules that you create AND THEN OBEY. Doesn't matter what those rules are. But if you're definition of occupation suddenly matches Medicaid I'd the mrdown fan club then you need to support people discussing it.

    That's the whole difference.

    Btw your sentence a bit changed is what the trump goons actually use at the moment: "why should anyone tolerate criminals?". And those fuckers just declared anything they don't like "illegal".

    That's what I'm asking: that everyone has the space to grow. That's why I recommend you to create transparent rules that you obey yourself: to not become like those shitheads. Because they are full of people absolutely sure if themselves with no way to reflect, no way to think.

  • Just from an outside perspective:

    you're playing the same game die a different side. What kind of consistent ruleset warrants a delete and ban for this?

    Power tripping for the right cause is still a powertrip.

    Edit: I just realize that just leaving it like this reads purely confrontational which was not my original inten:

    You can do better! If you want to have this kind of moderation that is actually fine in my book: as long as it's transparent and consistent.

    The exact rule must depend on the answer to what kind of community you want to build. Openly progressive vs openly debating vs aggressively neutral for example.

    I know you can do it, because anyone who has the energy to take on this endeavor has the potential to grow ❤️.

  • Copy/paste instead of linking because Lemmy doesn't like me>

    I can shad a light on that! [...]

    When we're in a fast paces dialogue with a high level of rapport I start speaking my thoughts before they're finished - and it happens that a thought starts out as "my opinion is ..." And in the middle transfers to "oh it would be way more interesting what your thoughts on this are!".

    Or I'm mentally distracted and fall back to the monologue voice ....

    Either way: the flow of the sentence already started as a statement and now I want to make sure that it's clear that your input is wanted and appreciated - and instead of saying "and perhaps that sounded like a statement but please treat it as a question" I fall back to "question mark."

  • Oh I can shad a light on that! Hope it's not en pair with the shelter animal hunting though.

    When we're in a fast paces dialogue with a high level of rapport I start speaking my thoughts before they're finished - and it happens that a thought starts out as "my opinion is ..." And in the middle transfers to "oh it would be way more interesting what your thoughts on this are!". Or I'm mentally distracted and fall back to the monologue voice ....

    Either way: the flow of the sentence already started as a statement and now I want to make sure that it's clear that your input is wanted and appreciated - and instead of saying "and perhaps that sounded like a statement but please treat it as a question" I fall back to "question mark."

  • In the sense of okhams razor it's also possible that you're just more sensibilized to the term.

    It would be a fun experiment to next time first check YouTube before looking it up elsewhere, just to eliminate the chance that the information vector is before the search.

    From there then come various other possibilities (from behaviour based prediction to Lemmy profe linking).

    Just to widen the search area!

  • BuyFromEU @feddit.org

    Searching for a keyboard made in EU ... impossible?