Scipitie @ Scipitie @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts

1

Comments

386

Joined

2 yr. ago

The bobiverse series could fit for you as well, quite a strong ramp up but starting, well, now.

Copy/paste instead of linking because Lemmy doesn't like me>

I can shad a light on that! [...]

When we're in a fast paces dialogue with a high level of rapport I start speaking my thoughts before they're finished - and it happens that a thought starts out as "my opinion is ..." And in the middle transfers to "oh it would be way more interesting what your thoughts on this are!".

Or I'm mentally distracted and fall back to the monologue voice ....

Either way: the flow of the sentence already started as a statement and now I want to make sure that it's clear that your input is wanted and appreciated - and instead of saying "and perhaps that sounded like a statement but please treat it as a question" I fall back to "question mark."

Oh I can shad a light on that! Hope it's not en pair with the shelter animal hunting though.

When we're in a fast paces dialogue with a high level of rapport I start speaking my thoughts before they're finished - and it happens that a thought starts out as "my opinion is ..." And in the middle transfers to "oh it would be way more interesting what your thoughts on this are!". Or I'm mentally distracted and fall back to the monologue voice ....

Either way: the flow of the sentence already started as a statement and now I want to make sure that it's clear that your input is wanted and appreciated - and instead of saying "and perhaps that sounded like a statement but please treat it as a question" I fall back to "question mark."

Oh that's a fun interpretation.

I read it more like "Gomez knows. All cops know.".

But I like yours better!

older folks

Oh wow I wonder where they're from

30s to 40s

Well ... you, too! That went directly into the bones and hurt. Deeply. Or it's the age that hurts. Not sure.

In the sense of okhams razor it's also possible that you're just more sensibilized to the term.

It would be a fun experiment to next time first check YouTube before looking it up elsewhere, just to eliminate the chance that the information vector is before the search.

From there then come various other possibilities (from behaviour based prediction to Lemmy profe linking).

Just to widen the search area!

I'm with what @BCsven@lemmy.ca said: get s mixed box if unsure.

That said: highly depending on her age and interests as well there is no need to go deeper into specific bricks.

After all the only thing that prevents a couple of 4x2 to become an airplane is imagination. Or a fire, a house, an animal.

So I suggest depending on age and interest to just talk with her and adjust accordingly.

And: especially Lego can be sometimes sniped used in big mixed boxes at flea markets and the likes - something that would bring s but of lootbox excitement in your lifes without the downsides;)

Okay it's even more hilarious:

"a place for straight and transgender lesbians …”

Was the phrasing it got changed to...

That said: I would love a community for "straight" people - including the quotation marks

Definitely neither! Well perhaps the first ... Spells on how to give the dead their heart, speech, etc. back:

https://museum.wa.gov.au/whats-on/afterlife/curators-introduction/papyrus-of-reri

I came across it when searching for spells charms incantations...

I can't argue about the historic relevance; The article you linked is from 2020, the issues from early 2019. The original matrix developing company seems to have deep ties as described, yes.

But:

If you follow the very first link I. The article you can read the history of the matrix protocol itself. It shows where and when the matrix protocol was separated from this company and what the status quo seems to be:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_(protocol)#History

From this it seems clear to me that the information from this article are by now obviously outdated with KDE and Mozilla two big mentioned community projects that are involved.

Wikipedia as primary source is not well suited, but the fact that the article linked to it themselves seem to show that they relied on the back then status quo.

In short: in 2017 they would be absolutely right, in 2020 there were still huge issues - but by now those are mostly addressed or are unknown.

I'd love to know which book this is if anyone knows.

My search skills didn't return anything matching, although I did find a book about Egyptian burial rights ...

There isn't a global law about age verification they countries could be exempt of. It's individual countries doing it.

And on top of that the laws are different from what I've seen, in the UK for example you have to fullfil certain criteria to fall under that law. But frankly it seems to be a mess in my opinion.

This is what an age verification service says about it:

https://www.yoti.com/blog/understanding-age-verification-online-safety-act/

Sadly there is no answer for you available because many of the processes around this are hidden.

I can only chime in from my own amateur experiments and there are answer is a clear "depends". Most adjustments are made either via additional training data. This simply means that you take more data and feed it indi an already trained LLM. The result is again an LLM black box with all its stochastic magic.

The other big way are system prompts. Those are simply instructions that already get interpreted as a part of te request and provide limitations.

These can get white fancy by now, in the sense of "when the following query asks you to count something run this python script with whatever you're supposed to count as input, the result will be a json that you can take then and do XYZ with it."

Or more simple: you tell the model to use other programs and how to use them.

For both approaches I don't need to maintain list: For the first one I have no way of knowing what it's doing in detail and I just need to keep the documents themselves.

For the second one it's literally a human readable text.

That's because I guess most historians would describe that period as pre history :p

Secondary source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistory

Primary source was a taskmaster UK episode which I can't find at an instance and is the main reason I'm writing this smartass comment :p

The first part is a technical question and the second part a definition one.

For the how to: the most common approach is to simply blacklist their IPs on a provider basis. This leads to no provider that obeys your blacklists to allow their users traffic to that target. Usually all providers in a nation obey that nations law (I assume, I only know that for my own :D)

For the censorship: I don't like that word because it's implications fan be used against any and all laws. A shitload of content is made inaccessible because it breaks laws from active coordination of attacks to human trafficking. All of this can be described as censorship.

Forthe UK law it's... I'm not British and to me it appears to be a vague tool to silence and control all types of content under the guise of protecting children. Not with the intention to protect or prevent something but with the intent to control. I would fully understand and emphasize with using the word censorship in this context.

Saved me a click, highly appreciated!

Das folgende ist was für Leute die auch Probleme haben, sich zurück zu halten:

Doch billig kaufen - und zwar bei Sachen, wo einem noch gar nicht ganz klar ist, ob man das langfristig braucht. Bei mir war das lange Werkzeug - erst Mal das ganz gunsitgr sexokd Hand oder b Ware. Wenn das dann kaputt ist oder ich wirklich was finde, was damit nicht ging, dann konnte ich mir über Qualität auch so Gedanken machen, dass es was bringt.

Habe sehr viele Sachen deshalb nicht gekauft....:D

I disagree. That's the foundation of a democracy: as long as you're not doing something illegal you should be able to ... Well .. exist.

The bank in question is a state owned one - they simply aren't allowed to do a second layer legal system.

Now that this organization is legal is the big fuckup, but that's not the banks fault.

Oh I'm aware of paper but didn't associate papery things with ... Well paper itself I guess that's the flaw. I wouldn't describe a tree as having a wooden expression either!

Could someone explain the joke to me? I guess somewhere the skin of garlic is called paper? Or is there another play on words?

The only thing I've found on the garlic Wikipedia is the description of its skin as papery but that's it...