SamboT @ SamboT @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

42

Joined

2 yr. ago

Why is content plural? If you ran this through ai first you'd have a better result.

Either buy more expensive shirts or stop buying creatine if you want to stop ripping them

I don't know

Any guesses if this is automated stupidity or a strategic stance by Meta?

Hating Java is kind of a pastime for me

Thats pretty standard human behavior

Idk that kind of sounds like getting rid of circles from society to stop people from driving their cars.

Its a matter of "how much time can each employee spend on one task/project"

Crowdsourcing decision-making can be a good way to make decisions. But complex, time-sensitive, specialized problems need to be handled with many hours of expertise in many different fields like data analytics (essentially predicting the future). Maybe the more specialization thats required, the less laymen input is effective in contributing. People spend their lives interpreting data, and can make fast data-driven decisions that produce the results. From theres it all Game Theory between organizations and its not that crazy that they refuse to concede the competitive edge and let someone else dominate the market. It seems like it would be hard to enforce not making certain decisions data driven.

Getting input from employees that are understanding of the subtleties is probably appreciated but even experts can be unfamiliar with the cadence of the project schedule which is why Change Control is a thing to ensure changes are not delaying or raising costs, or work the changes in with minimal distruption.

If "bosses" arent doing their job then they wont be able to explain to their bosses whats going on for them to make decisions effectively. People at the top dont like incompetency even if they themselves are. Yes bad decisions can come from the top and power corrupts.

I think its clear our government has failed us on many levels but i think banning the abstract structure "hierarchy" is some weak meme shit.

Hierarchies are not inherently good or bad.

They help where they help and they oppress where they oppress.

I dont know what this means

Idk how that applies to every organization. It sounds pretty specific.

Because were talking about getting rid of all hierarchies right?

And if decisions are at rhe lowest possible levels then it seems like thats a hierarchy, which is more horizontal rather than not being a hierarchy.

Also i dont understand what "everything being voluntary" means and if that applies to all organizations or just government or what.

And i dont know what you meam by "the position" or "temporal" or "at the start" and that it "changes everything".

If the goal of society is to put equality above all else then i take your point.

I think horizontal hierarchies are generally better in an organization in terms of motivating people to contribute and give them a sense of equity.

But idk how you avoid the fact that people do have bad ideas, or well intentioned ideas that could start a cascade of delays in project planning for example. People focusing on the excellence at different levels of work is important right? But having a chain of command to maintain vision, timelines, budgets, stakeholders seems to depend on hierarchy.

Hierarchies seem like an important structure to have in society.

I dont really understand why they shouldnt be able to believe that. They are people with their own interests and ideals. Why does that make them bad?

So if youll join me down disinformation avenue, do you think these are largely real people? I only ask because every time i find myself turning back to corporate social media its because the high polarization of all topics by people like that on lemmy.

It seems like a good deterrent to the adoption of FOSS social media if someone were to employ ai to do so, but i can also believe that the first people to transition to FOSS would be highly radicalized people.

I really like C# so far. Im excited to avoid java and expand away from python at the same time.

So they are people who want to violently or otherwise enforce their ideal view of some flavor of communism on the rest of the world? And they try to realize this by organizing and radicalizing people on social media?

Damn thats the shortest article. If you took the quotes out its like 30 words.

Guys rule number 1 of the disinformation age... dont meaningfully engage with a post thats only a title and jpeg. Just move on. Demand more of your social media. This is the benefit of an upvote downvote system but it does require our thought and consideration.

Guys rule number 1 of the disinformation age... dont meaningfully engage with a post thats only a title and jpeg, especially if its playing on polarizing opinions or grand claims.

Dont let this crap prime you to come to conclusions you wouldnt have otherwise.