Rooki @ Rooki @lemmy.world

I am Rooki Cookie. I am a programmer and i try to help everyone :)

---

Read more

Posts

118

Comments

1,496

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

Hi,

we will investigate this matter, we have some issue on slrpnk.net too and i think it has some relation to yours.

Thanks for your patience.

https://www.wired.com/story/nasa-boeing-starliner-return-home-spacex/ for non archive version.

But still no alternative or improvement ideas. So i guess we will have to stick to MBFC if there is no one with any ideas.

Thats impossible. It would break a lot of connections, federation. Saves could be done if the account is on the same instance.

I did not remova any comments? Those removed comments are renoved by mods of the community.

But the issue is there is no other alternative that has an ordered and automatable access.

Then the other option was to have a community made "source" but that brings up the issue with "User x is not fit to contribute", "Remove the bad rating on site xyz.com" etc. tadah back to the start with the "crying" ablut topic x.

We are still working on such an system as this could at least reduce the shitstorm about having no option to alter the rating. But its not final that decision.

No of course not, some were constructive and gave an alternative site or adjusted format how they expect it to look.

I just reflect how it feels to get such bad feedback without any real feedback in it.

Feedback includes many types of input but not: Disliking it because of personal opinion, because service x rated your favorite news page badly.

My feedback to that emotional feedback was just my emotion back to it.

If we wanted everyones opinion on MBFC yes then we would loved this response from you. But feedback is not just MBFC BAD!!!!!!!!

What if theoretically give you feedback on your math test: "0 Points Because ITS BAD!!!!!" Then you would think why was it bad? The formula ? The results? The readability? Or were my books that i read bad?

"MBFC BAD DESTROY IT" isnt valid. Its just personal opinion. We responded to the real feedback accordingly and will implement them soon.

No, there was some good. Feedback, those "I HATE MBFC DESTROY IT" Feedback was not constructive.

We reduced it a bit. It will take affect after next deployment ( tomorrow )

That was sadly the point why we didnt recognized that as feedback, rather as just being childish because some site said some bad things about their favorite news page.

At least we got some real feedback that were constructive. We will implement those and deploy it.

The wall of text we will reduce in the next update. The others we will discuss with the team.

You can even be better than that! You can make a community that fact check news article / news pages. Then we can add the threads from that community to the bot and have there news page specific discussion.

Not open source (yet) we will have to cleanup and then open source it.

Then give improvement ideas? Deleting the bot is not an option sry.

Thanks for the feedback. With the new format we will think about it, but i think this is pretty good.

We will discuss this and come back to you. We would love to open sourc ethe bot but the code quality for reading is not in a good state. We will have to clean the code up. But we will be working for that.

May you have to deal with people like yourself for eternity nonstop.

so no pause or sleep.

We added the possibility for users to use the newly added context how they want it or not.

And you overexaggerated how much impact it really has on people. I have the feeling i am speaking with just some peoples alt here, just my suspicion.

Like said, if you dont like it block it. Like with everything else on the platform. Dont get you angry over a bot.