I hear about incompatibility problems with hardware

This only gets better with time. When Windows Vista was released, Linux actually supported more hardware than Windows did, because it never had a comparable break in driver compatibility. Nowadays, unless you are buying bleeding edge hardware which just hit the market within the past month, just about everything works. Typically, once a piece of hardware is supported by Linux, it will remain supported until everybody who knows how it works dies. Linux may suffer with bleeding edge / niche hardware, but it shines above all others in keeping that hardware useful, even when there is no market incentive for the manufacturer to continue support.

You will run into problems here and there, but the grass isn't much greener on Windows where I have also experienced problems with oddball hardware. The only saving grace for Windows is if you buy a computer that ships with Windows, all the drivers will be installed. If you download the installation media directly from Microsoft, you end up in the same boat of having most of the hardware working, but having to tie up loose ends yourself.

So where do I start? I don’t even know how to choose hardware or what to look for.

I'd look in your closet for some old computer that you stopped using. Try it there first. Nothing to lose. If you don't have a heap of e-waste lying around, start with something inexpensive to learn the ropes, or try installing it on a virtual machine like VirtualBox. In general, just about any computer in the world will run Linux. You might just run into issues with oddball things like fingerprint scanners or wierd sensors (i.e. some laptops use accelerometers to stop spinning the hard drive if you drop it).

I’m unsure what I have to do to stay ‘safe’ on Linux.

This is easier to do than anywhere else. Linux comes in the form of "distributions." The distributor hosts a package repository, and you get all (well, 98%) of your software from that repository. This is different from Windows, where it is typical to download individual applications from all corners of the internet. As long as you trust your distributor, you are generally solid as far as safety goes. The only risks come from installing third-party software - but even then - you just apply the same logic as on Windows. Where is this program coming from? Do I trust this person / organization? etc.

The default settings are intended to be as safe as practical, and the various manuals and tutorials out there will warn you about doing stupid things. It usually requires manual intervention to make things unsafe.

Does Linux come with a trustworthy firewall/antivirus/malware detection?

It is rather uncommon to run antivirus software on Linux. This is typically only done on servers (for instance, a mail server screening attachments before forwarding them along to end users). You can install ClamAV, but this is redundant if you are getting all of your software straight from the distributor. In my humble opinion, antivirus software is a poor approach to security. Once a computer is infected, nothing on it should be trusted, including the antivirus software. Antivirus software is more appropriate as a data recovery tool than a prophylactic.

There is a firewall is built in to the kernel in the form of iptables or nftables, and there are some GUI programs for adjusting them. Again, a firewall isn't typically necessary unless you are running servers which listen for incoming connections. Typically, having your computer behind a router is sufficient. Unless your router is configured to forward incoming connections to your computer, those packets will be dropped there. Firewalls are more useful as a redundant method of making sure something like a database server, which is also configured only to accept connections from local processes, doesn't accidentally get misconfigured and accept connections from the open Internet.

I hear that ‘open source’ means people can check the code but how do I know if someone has checked the code—I wouldn’t know what to look for myself.

This is a valid critique. There certainly have been times where this assumption has turned out poorly. Still, it is a better situation than completely unverifiable proprietary software. At the very least, contributors to the individual pieces of software are looking at it, as well as the distributors which need to build and package it. There are a few layers of review taking place, even if they don't quite reach the level of a full audit.

TL;DR: If you are just using your computer for casual web browsing and shit, try out Fedora or Ubuntu. The installation media boots to a functioning desktop, and you can try things out and see if they work before committing to installing (this is not true for all distributions though).

Real "A vote for Bart is a vote for Anarchy!" vibes every time that link gets shared. I love it.

I take a very literal approach to "the state." The state is the status quo. The way things currently are. The totality of social relations. The state is what keeps Haskell programmers awake at night. Nothing more, nothing less.

A hippie commune, an Anarchist book club, a Syndicalist federation, and a dictatorship of the proletariat helmed by a Communist party are all states. It isn't very useful to argue about what is and isn't a state. It is much more interesting to explore how these various forms of social organization differ in composition and outcome. To learn from effective practice, incorporate the triumphs of past movements, while avoiding the mistakes. Differing conditions call for differing tactics, and it doesn't behoove anybody to be too dogmatic.

Can they delete this?

We have, in a limited sense.

A proper materialist analysis of social media must delve deeper than the software and protocol layers. The data centers, and networks which make up the physical infrastructure of the Internet are gargantuan, and remain extremely privatized, and this is a terrain which can get swept right out from under our feet. All it would take is a shift towards a legal regime of criminalizing internet "extremism." The second the cloud services and ISPs smell a whif of potential liability, they are cutting us loose, and we're back to square one on the monopoly platforms, under a much more advanced regime of censorship and psychological manipulation.

We can celebrate our gains, but we should never get too cozy.

This is a good point. This shit happens on Reddit and Twitter too, but when it happens there it's a brief meeting at corporate HQ followed by a swift ban wave. The extended drama is a consequence of the fact that no individual holds that power.

It is definitely inducing cognitive dissonance. The developers are simply are communists trying to collectivize social media, and that will live in their heads rent free as long as they stick around.

Why will they not federate with others, I need to see them all charge into Beehaw and Midwest Social, even if its only a day before they are taken off,

The short answer to this question is that it will require some robust discussion before a decision is made. At this point, no decision has been made one way or another.

They could be pulling something sneaky here. The vast majority of people lurk, and most people who lurk probably don't even have accounts. If you haven't bothered to sign up, you probably haven't bothered to use the old interface or a third party application. It wouldn't surprise me if the vast majority of their traffic comes through the standard web interface, even if the stats for user activity paint a different picture.

Lmao this shit is remining me of the hostile take-over of FreeNode.

This could potentially be implemented as a Lemmy theme, which users would be able to select on the settings page.

It is a mixed bag. When reading excessively long lines of text, it becomes difficult to locate the next line after completing one. Allowing lines of text to become too long is considered poor typography for this reason. When the lines are constrained to a reasonable length, the text becomes easier to read. Think about a page from a novel, or a sheet of A4 paper. They are shaped like that for a reason. Of course, images and video are another story. Constraining the size of an image or video with such wide margins does nothing to aid visibility.

Back in 1995 we had an "Internet Phonebook." Literally a 4 inch thick book which listed domain names and brief descriptions. This was before / just as the search engines we know today were taking off. Google was founded in 1998. Alta Vista and Yahoo! had only just been founded in '95.

Anti-sectarianism is the general rule. The community is predominantly Marxist, but has its share of Anarchists. There is no official list of points of unity, but anti-imperialism, anti-capitalism, anti-racism, anti-gender/sexuality discrimination are basically non-negotiable.

I can only speak for myself, but my sentiment is that the left in the imperial core is so disorganized that the majority of sectarian disagreements are purely hypothetical and stupid to get worked up over. We can have discussions about theory and tactics, but there is no reason to assemble the perfect party platform and get into bitter fights about its nuances when there is no party to speak of. You can't build the mass line without the mass.

Of course, this doesn't apply to the type of historically illiterate, American-exceptionalist Reddit "Anarchists," or any of that PatSoc MAGA Communism bullshit. People stanning the Shining Path will probably get a lot of weird looks. We give the handful of Trots their fair share of noogies, but we don't exclude them.

It is a relatively small community. If you are comment in good faith and demonstrate you aren't full of imperialist brainworms you will probably be fine. If you pick out individual people with the dumbest takes and graft that onto broad movements, putting words in peoples' mouths, you might run into trouble. We love dunking on people with bad takes, but if you take a particular Bellingcat dropout's cringepost and act like they are the designated spokesperson of Anarchism, that's the kind of thing that doesn't fly. Basically, don't be disingenuous.

We're not the type of community that will ban somebody for mentioning in passing that they participate in mutual aid on the basis that mutual aid is charity and therefor not praxis. That kind of hair-splitting dogmatism can stay on Reddit as far as we're concerned.

CNC machining / setup / programming. Your canonical steel toe factory worker.