Come on man...

You're being pedantic. Yes if you choose the least dense wood you can, and the most dense particle board, sure. 👍.

I didn't say heavier. I said dense. I wasn't making a comment about the strength.

So who do you side with instead? The owners who are without a doubt corrupt?

IKEA is a lot better quality than Walmarts build-your-own furniture. I have both. The IKEA stuff is a lot more dense, the connections are more precise and stronger, and overall the IKEA stuff is just better quality.

That's just false. Particle board is without a doubt less dense than actual wood.

I feel like a lot of people might think miniature building/painting could be easy - or at least quick.

It isn't.

Right, in perspective of the initial orange portal the people are moving. They aren't at rest compared to the portal. The portal is at rest.

Yes it is.

It's the largest social media right now.

It makes sense that changes to it, especially changes like this, are news.

What is that even suppose to mean in this context?

The only way for someone to make money in crypto is for someone else to lose it.

Crypto is a scam.

I didn't say it did.

That's a No True Scotsman Fallacy.

And also, laissez-faire Capitalism is one of the keystone principles of Libertarianism.

They're almost always corporate libertarians, putting business before individual freedoms.

Have you learned anything from these comments and responses you've gotten?

Like I need to know. I need to know if you've reflected at all.

https://lemmy.sdf.org/comment/1847252

This you?

Literally two comments ago you were making excuses.

The US has committed multiple genocides.

You were just indoctrinated by it's propaganda to believe they haven't.

What the hell are you talking about? I went along with your "thought experiment." I answered your question.

I didn't avoid a single thing. Did I miss something you asked? Ask again if I did.

There are 100% people that live under capitalism and don't work, but don't ever have to worry about starving.

There are people who get unfairly given more profit than they work for.

There are people who unfairly get less of the profits than they deserve.

I'm saying it should be fairly distributed by the workers. You're pretending it isn't an issue.

I'm explicitly saying he should not profit from the others labor. I'm explicitly saying they should be fairly compensated for their labor.

No. If he's still working beside them (like you said in your example), then his labor is making the value. He is entitled to that value.

It's impossible to "make" value from someone else's labor. The person doing the labor created the value.

Your example also isn't them voluntarily working for him. You said in your example that it was either work for him or starve.

If he's not and he's sitting doing nothing - creating no value - then he gets nothing.