Skip Navigation
Capitalism Can't Solve Climate Change
  • Really? I'm not convinced the Chinese government acts in the interests of its people at all. That's probably the biggest reason I can't call it Socialism. Just because government influence is stronger than in the West, the economic system isn't completely different.

  • Capitalism Can't Solve Climate Change
  • But isn't the means of production still mostly controlled by capital owners? Sure, some industries are influenced by the government, but that is also the case in the West. The plan is certainly more detailed for China, but to me Socialism always meant labor is controlling the means of production. How's that the case when an elitist single-party government influences the capital owners?

  • Capitalism Can't Solve Climate Change
  • Enlighten me then. Means of production doesn't seem to be controled by the party alone. Most of China's economy still follows capitalist principles. Rich Chinese and owners of businesses are still private citizens. Sure, some influenced by the government, some industries very heavily regulated, but China still follows capitalist principles in most cases.

    I always thought Socialism means that means of production is controlled by labor directly, not capital owners or an elists single-party government.

  • Capitalism Can't Solve Climate Change
  • As the life-sustaining places become more scarce, they become more expensive. Your best play for survival is to play the game, amass wealth and afford the trip to Elysium. That's why even the people understanding the problem are part of it.

  • Capitalism Can't Solve Climate Change
  • Let's not call China socialist when a single party dictates larger economic trends in an otherwise competitive global market. It's just not "free" as in free market capitalism.

    Otherwise I completely agree with the weaknesses of the western capitalist systems.

  • Europe will lose all credibility if Russia wins in Ukraine, warns French president Macron
  • There's a few things Europe isn't good at:

    • Weapons and weapon systems are developed independently. That results in incompatible weapons and very expensive production costs because they aren't produced at scale and multiple versions of the same are developed by the different countries/manufacturers.
    • The only military international logistics and organization that European countries currently know is NATO. Outside the NATO framework organization is completely chaotic.
    • Similar to the first two points: The European countries don't have their military interests aligned and can't agree on deployment, funding and procurement of weapons. Bureaucracy stands in the way of scaling up production.

    On the other hand: Europe is rich and technologically advanced. We've seen in the first two years since the Russian invasion that technological superiority can outpace the sheer mass of human capital that Russia can throw at the front.

  • A New York Times reporter was asked why they consistently frame things as bad for Biden but never bad for Trump.
  • Dude, the other day I was reading some rag because there was nothing else to do in the train... One article was just Trump's agenda without any commentary. How is that news if you don't put it in perspective and with the context that Trump barely reached any of his goals in the first term. Unbelievable.

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)P1
    P1r4nha @feddit.de
    Posts 0
    Comments 319