So fox is doing the same thing liberal media did to trump... hopefully it ends the same way.

if they went underwater

Bankruptcy would work the same as it does with a stock company. Since Bankruptcy is just liquidating all a companies assets then forming a queue of people with claims to that money, with secured debt holders at the front of the line and stock holders at the back, you'd just remove the stock holders at the back, maybe replace them with the employees to give them a sort of "severance"

Good now the yimbys and the "abundance" guys can shut up. Hopefully now they'll see any of these quick fixes and "cutting the red tape" won't meaningfully effect the housing supply and we can start to realize letting the developers do whatever they want won't solve this crisis.

What your describing is a socialist revolution. Marx referred to it as the abolition of private property, which he said is the goal of communism. Private property doesn't mean your phone or car or home or whatever, that is personal property, it's stuff you own to use. Private property is something you own to make money from, stocks, bonds, rental properties etc. That type of property is based off power and exploitation, the power to kick someone out of there home if they don't pay rent, or the exploitation of the working class by extracting there surplus value (profit) which goes to pay a stocks dividends, or to be reinvested in the business thus raising the stocks capital holdings and the stocks value.

In Marxism private property is the justification given to the working class for there exploitation, and abolishing it will free the working class and allow them to organize horizontally like you said with voting, without bourgeoisie property relations.

How would you get anyone to take risks and start a business

People create things all the time without a profit motive. Assuming they have a good safety net behind them that allows them to start up there ideas people will create. Case in point the app were on right now, it's developed open source with no profit motive, no stocks, no company. It's built by a bunch of hardline communist who believe in an open social network.

What banks

There are credit unions that function as co-ops with no stock ownership

they would have absolutely nothing as collateral

Co-ops can have collateral just like any other business, property of a store or factory, stock ( in the product sense ) etc. Yeah we wouldn't have silicon valley with vcs betting millions on unproven tech, but do we really need that?

Also this is all assuming there's no state involvement or planning. The state has a great credit line that it can use to backstop loans for small cooperative enterprises or just create the enterprises itself, eg. City run grocery stores like zohrans been pitching.

Anyone else been getting a lot of fossil fuel ads lately? I hear them on my podcasts, even progressive ones like the nation, talking about how everything is made with fossil fuels and we need them.

I guess it's a good sign since it means there public opinion is so shit they need to put up pr, but they're annoying.

It's the same with the red spot in north-western Michigan. A lot of cottages for rich people from the southern cities in michigan.

Don't worry, trumps learning. Jan 6th insurrectionists are all getting pardoned right now meanwhile people are getting deported for saying free palestine.

Sweet, was mad that there was no serious candidate challenging Pelosi from the left this last election. SF deserves better.

but the metro is full of crazy (homeless) people

You think you have to pass a mental health test to get a license? The person driving right next to you could be having a mental breakdown and you wouldn't even know. At least if someone's yelling on the metro I can notice them and switch cars.

For anyone wondering waymos (Google driverless cars) handle rain just fine as far as I've seen, and they have service in Austin. Idk why you would ever choose to take a tesla taxi.

Actual figure is 19%, idk if that's good or bad, but I doubt they're leaving cause the spectrum of socialism. I'd guess NYC generally has a pretty high turnover rate over 5 years with young adults planning on leaving for the suburbs when they get married / have kids and older people planning on leaving for Florida / the country when they retire.

I like how they've gone full mask off and given up on the anti-semite attacks and are just calling anyone not calling for Gaza to be ethnically cleansed a Palestinian like it's an insult. Not even hiding the Islamophobia any more.

It's also double funny that he's calling fucking Schumer a Palestinian, it's like calling Biden a communist, which he also probably said. It just goes to show no matter how much the dems try to moderate to accommodate the conservatives they'll always be the enemy.

That'll cause competition with the private owned stores and force them to push down prices / raise wages until their profit margins are gone, putting them out of business.

The only entity that will buy the defunct stores will be the state , or maybe some actual non-profits , and now the state owns all the grocery stores and communism will be achieved. Then we get bread lines, is that what you want? /s.

Liberals: No one can even run in the primary against our geriatric dear leader since it could cause a rift in the party

Also liberals: This anti semite is too dangerous, we must save the voters from there decision with our favorite sex criminal.

Honestly that may be the best scenario for Zohran, Cuomo and Adam's would split the corrupt corporate centrist vote and give him an easy win.

It's obviously Commodus, and anyone who disagrees can face me in the coliseum applebees

Maybe "communist" by the 60s definition as in anyone to the left of keynes then yeah I guess so, but MLK wasn't a communist in any real political sense.

The analogy still holds though, many of the leaders OP is pointing out are regressive right wing nationalist who would naturally align with putin without being agents of the Kremlin.

Both these accusations tend to put the blame of these movements on foreigners meddling with our democracy instead of real strains of thought coming from that democracy that need to be addressed.

Yeah, and there were plenty of left journalists on the payroll of Moscow in the 60s. They tended to cover the civil rights movement and anti-war movement very positively, does that mean the leaders of those movements were also secretly agents of the communists?

Has there been any proof that the people OP mentioned have any connection to putin? Don't get me wrong there all horrible people, but it's not because there "Russian assets" and if they're gonna go against this God awful war then good on them.

This is just "the anti Vietnam War protestors are secretly working for the soviets" for the modern era. There were just as many conspiracies that left liberals were secretly agents of Moscow in the 60s.