Uhhhhhh without abusing that law.

Any bets on how many of them actually have some form of legal status to be in the country for at least the time being?

Expect more recalls, these things usually come in batches as other OEMs jump on after the 1st person taking the biggest news cycle hit!

You could just require them to use a power only usb cord...

I'm hopeful that it really is just a temporary thing given the Trump situation and with a new leader and that behind us (might take more than 1 term of course) that they'll be able to come back stronger and make the Liberals advance things they wouldn't otherwise again. Also you never know, maybe they'll get some leverage with the current set up, but seems less likely for this term.

Interesting, I guess I'm wrong on this one, I thought it was only with the minority parties (as in not the seat leader), but it's minority parties that would be pretty much forced to do it to make it work.

We've never had a federal coalition government, only that almost one when Harper prorogued parliament to avoid it.

edit: I do suspect we may have had one if the Conservatives won a small minority though.

I get that, and it was hilarious, but there was never going to be a coalition government which was my main point. He was using the wrong language intentionally. Essentially he didn't even almost prevent it because it was never going to happen.

It's not even a coalition.

Coallitons are when the party with the most seats (but not a majority) doesn't form government because the other parties all work together to form government.

When the party with the most seats (but not majority) forms government with the help of another party on non confidence votes , it's just a minority government.

They just try to scare people with the coalition talk to try and make it seem nefarious, such as when it almost happened to Harper, but it's a legitimate part of how our government works.

There was a point while votes were being counted tonight, we could have theoretically had a con+bq coalition government.

Edit: and even as of right now, the cons+bq+ndp could form a coalition, but I can't imagine those 3 parties ever working together other than to trigger an election via vote of no confidence.

but if I’m not mistaken the universal pharma and dentalcare we have now were initiatives pushed by the NDP that the Liberals get credit for because they were the ones holding the PM seat.

No one who has any political awareness would give the liberals credit for that. That was the NDP's contribution.

There was an article awhile back as well that said something along the lines of 80% of damage is coming from drones as well.

Obviously drones can't do that alone, but it's their drones doing their damage.

I wouldn't really call it less advantageous than it might seem. LFP are more convenient for sure as you don't need to think about it as much, assuming the battery provides adequate range.

For NMC if you're going to do a trip that needs the whole battery you can charge it to full and not worry about it. Same for driving down close to 0 before charging if the road trip calls for it. You just don't do this all the time, you only do it if you need it.

The vast majority of people are not driving their vehicles from full to empty every day.

I don't think it was ever a real surprise that he was a asshole and a very hard to work for, at least it wasn't to me. You're right that if you looked at all it was there and not really hidden.

But this is way beyond that.

Edit: oh and he's always been vindictive and petty as well.

The problem is that shitty rule is often (not sure about NY specifically) added after the fact to stop Tesla.

The general rule was always if you ever used a dealership you have to continue using a dealership. (and Tesla never has so shouldn't have to)

Then when Tesla came around the auto makers dealers lobbied to change that to you must use a dealership regardless. In some cases Tesla lobbied/went to court against that and got exemptions, in some cases got it thrown out, and in some cases outright lost.

The rule of having to use one if you already use one makes sense. The dealerships put a lot of money into it and could be rugpulled otherwise.

But changing a law specifically to fuck with Tesla was more than just a shitty rule.

But I don't know if NY is one of these places that changed the rules to fuck them in the first place.

By the time future hits happen it could change to a in the heat of the moment situation. I wouldn't say the future hits change things, it would all come down to the 1st one.

Over a mixer maybe not, but I have the machine already and no mixer.

ICE Watch.

Take turns keeping an eye out for and warning people in the community.

Are you allowed to booby trap your house so you can sleep safely at night?

Glad I just got a bread maker!

Gotta learn to make buns with it so it's just not loaves.

AI Answer to how many you'd need

To sustainably feed yourself with rabbits, you'd likely need a small breeding colony of rabbits. A few does (female rabbits) and a buck (male rabbit) could produce enough meat for one person. A guideline is one doe and a buck can produce about 2-3 dozen meat rabbits per year, says Polyculture Farming. More Details:

Breeding:

A small breeding colony of rabbits, like 2 does and a buck, could potentially produce 40-50 rabbits per year, enough for a small family, according to Mother Earth News.

Meat Yield:

A rabbit can yield a significant amount of meat. One rabbit can easily feed a family of four, and they are generally sold whole, weighing just under three pounds, says Countryside Magazine and FoodPrint.

Sustainability:

Rabbits can be a sustainable meat source due to their relatively efficient conversion of feed to meat compared to other livestock. Individual Needs:

The number of rabbits needed would depend on your individual meat consumption and preferences.

Step 1 - Start corp

Step 2 - Get Rich

Step 3 - Hookers and blow

Step 4 - Bailout money

Step 5 - Go to step 3