Nighed @ Nighed @feddit.uk

帖子

15

评论

676

加入于

2 yr. ago

管理

---

Thank you for the link, good read.

UK/Europe: https://europa.eu/youreurope/business/dealing-with-customers/consumer-contracts-guarantees/consumer-guarantees/index_en.htm

I switched to french with English subtitles.... Because Mielle sounded like Shadowheart. It was fine for most stuff, but all of the jump/dodge/hit sounds, it sounded just like her.

Disadvantages of common voice actors....

Oof, I'm used to two as a minimum. (Looked it up, it's by law)

Oof, I'm used to two as a minimum. (Looked it up, it's by law)

Should have still been under warranty?

To be clear, you get 1 meaningfully decision. All the other 'roleplay' is conversation choices/optional lore conversations.

In that sense it's more an interactive story with builds and good (IMO) combat.

£1.2 million fine. Less than £1 per user affected.

I wouldn't call it well made. Had a lot of quality issues and bugs that were not fixed.

It's good that google has made it an option though.

I think everyone (on rental bikes) are crazy for cycling without helmets, in a busy environment!

The graphs actually come from this article: https://ourworldindata.org/a-history-of-global-living-conditions

YouTube has a great algorithm, in that it mostly seems to show you stuff you actually want to watch, and let's you say you don't like stuff.

You can train it with a little effort to show you what you want.

You just can't make the shorts go away, even with premium!

Often because there are breadcrumbs etc in there, or other contaminants.

If it's gone fully mouldy, bin it obviously.

It's now a requirement to be able to book appointments online I believe?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cjed4qvzjeyo

I thought that jams were so sugary it was probably fine?

My point was basically that this can happen to you too, and if it couldn't, people would complain anyway.

No need to call people morons over it.

It's not that it can't be done then, most likely no one has checked.

Buying out solo deved apps to host malware has been a thing for ages.

Why can't Firefox be effected by this?

Does chrome not ask about plugins requesting new permissions or something?

Either a browser is bad because it doesn't allow extensions.... Or it bad because it does and lets users install insecure stuff..... Or it's bad because it locks the extensions down so much you can't do anything useful with them.

Which type of bad are you shilling for?